The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics, alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.politics.democrats, alt.society.liberalism
From: Kel <Kelvars...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Aug 20 2008 1:02 pm
Subject: When the National Enquirer said it had more pictues of Edward's love child, they meant it.
Is anyone really surprised at any of this? I never bought the Edwards
as family man image. The whole picture (with the forgive me, overweight Elizabeth) just didn't ring true. Edwards was so obviously conceited and self aggrandizing and most of all, disingenuous. I remember several things about "looking older than John" that Elizabeth said years ago that made me cringe given his obvious vanity. I know that not all conservatives are perfect. But far too many http://www.nationalenquirer.com/john_edwards_blockbuster_new_expose/c... You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||