Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
alt.gossip.celebrities
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion When the National Enquirer said it had more pictues of Edward's love child, they meant it.
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
4635 Dead  
View profile
  More options Aug 20 2008, 2:27 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics, alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.politics.democrats, alt.society.liberalism
From: 4635 Dead <zepp22114...@finestplanet.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 06:27:13 -0700
Local: Wed, Aug 20 2008 2:27 pm
Subject: Re: When the National Enquirer said it had more pictues of Edward's love child, they meant it.
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:33:17 -0700 (PDT), "rivergirl...@hotmail.com"

<rivergirl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 20, 7:02 am, Kel <Kelvars...@aol.com> wrote:
>> Is anyone really surprised at any of this? I never bought the Edwards
>> as family man image. The whole picture (with the forgive me,
>> overweight Elizabeth) just didn't ring true. Edwards was so obviously
>> conceited and self aggrandizing and most of all, disingenuous. I
>> remember several things about "looking older than John" that Elizabeth
>> said years ago that made me cringe given his obvious vanity.

>> I know that not all conservatives are perfect. But far too many
>> liberals have no concept of real selflessness or commitment. They
>> simply do whatever seems appealing at the moment. I wonder how the
>> children of Mr. and Mrs. Edwards are feeling today.

>> http://www.nationalenquirer.com/john_edwards_blockbuster_new_expose/c...

>Democrats have sex scandals and republicans have money scandals. Of
>course, Clinton had both. But what a farfetching statement:  But far
>too many
>> liberals have no concept of real selflessness or commitment.

Republicans don't have sex scandals?

Newt Gingrich.  Harry Hyde.  David Vitter.  Larry Craig. Dick Morris.
Just to name a few of recent note.
--

What do you call a Republican with a conscience?

An ex-Republican.

http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=8827 (From Yang, AthD (h.c)

"Prosperity and peace are in the balance," -- Putsch, not admitting that he's against both

Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001      

Not dead, in jail, or a slave?  Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
Zepps_News-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
Zepps_essays-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google