The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics, alt.gossip.celebrities, alt.politics.democrats, alt.society.liberalism
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Aug 20 2008 1:33 pm
Subject: Re: When the National Enquirer said it had more pictues of Edward's love child, they meant it.
On Aug 20, 7:02 am, Kel <Kelvars...@aol.com> wrote:
> Is anyone really surprised at any of this? I never bought the Edwards Democrats have sex scandals and republicans have money scandals. Of > as family man image. The whole picture (with the forgive me, > overweight Elizabeth) just didn't ring true. Edwards was so obviously > conceited and self aggrandizing and most of all, disingenuous. I > remember several things about "looking older than John" that Elizabeth > said years ago that made me cringe given his obvious vanity. > I know that not all conservatives are perfect. But far too many > http://www.nationalenquirer.com/john_edwards_blockbuster_new_expose/c... course, Clinton had both. But what a farfetching statement: But far too many > liberals have no concept of real selflessness or commitment.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||