...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I consider to be normal waist area. I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, they leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object dontcha know. I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, or rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can still pig out and not notice. What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less crisps. ;-)
> ...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put > on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. > I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate > in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem > to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I > consider to be normal waist area. > I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, they > leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object dontcha know. > I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away > with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to > wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, or > rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can > still pig out and not notice. > What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less > crisps. ;-)
> ...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put > on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. > I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate > in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem > to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I > consider to be normal waist area. > I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, they > leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object dontcha know. > I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away > with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to > wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, or > rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can > still pig out and not notice. > What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less > crisps. ;-)
>...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put >on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. >I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate >in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem >to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I >consider to be normal waist area. >I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, >they leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object >dontcha know. >I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away >with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to >wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, >or rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can >still pig out and not notice. >What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less >crisps. ;-)
>Bobbie
The latest "low-rise" jeans get Mavis in a real temper, because they are so stupid; unflattering on anyone, really, especially when they stoop and reveal their thongs. She finds it almost impossible to find any with a decent length zip.
Hint: Have you tried buying men's, and taking in the waist? Only trouble is the legs are too long even for me!
I get away with it because the other stupid current fashion is to wear them bunched into folds on your shoes. -- Gordon H Remove "invalid" to reply
> In message <7lb16lF391i8...@mid.individual.net>, Bobbie > <homefraih...@myhoose.co.uk> writes
> >...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put > >on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. > >I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate > >in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem > >to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I > >consider to be normal waist area. > >I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, > >they leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object > >dontcha know. > >I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away > >with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to > >wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, > >or rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can > >still pig out and not notice. > >What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less > >crisps. ;-)
> >Bobbie
> The latest "low-rise" jeans get Mavis in a real temper, because they are > so stupid; unflattering on anyone, really, especially when they stoop > and reveal their thongs. > She finds it almost impossible to find any with a decent length zip.
> Hint: Have you tried buying men's, and taking in the waist? > Only trouble is the legs are too long even for me!
> I get away with it because the other stupid current fashion is to wear > them bunched into folds on your shoes. > -- > Gordon H > Remove "invalid" to reply- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
Like grey squirrels, an importation from the mighty U.S.A.? Toci
>On Nov 3, 10:26 am, Gordon H <Gordon_N...@g3snx.demon.co.uk.invalid> >wrote: >> In message <7lb16lF391i8...@mid.individual.net>, Bobbie >> <homefraih...@myhoose.co.uk> writes
>> >...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put >> >on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. >> >I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate >> >in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem >> >to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I >> >consider to be normal waist area. >> >I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, >> >they leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object >> >dontcha know. >> >I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away >> >with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to >> >wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, >> >or rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can >> >still pig out and not notice. >> >What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less >> >crisps. ;-)
>> >Bobbie
>> The latest "low-rise" jeans get Mavis in a real temper, because they are >> so stupid; unflattering on anyone, really, especially when they stoop >> and reveal their thongs. >> She finds it almost impossible to find any with a decent length zip.
>> Hint: Have you tried buying men's, and taking in the waist? >> Only trouble is the legs are too long even for me!
>> I get away with it because the other stupid current fashion is to wear >> them bunched into folds on your shoes. >> -- >> Gordon H
>Like grey squirrels, an importation from the mighty U.S.A.? Toci
I don't know where these fashions originate, Toci, then there's the other one of narrow spectacle frames, into which it's impossible to fit decent bi-focal lenses. -- Gordon H Remove "invalid" to reply
> ...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put > on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. > I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate > in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem > to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I > consider to be normal waist area. > I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, they > leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object dontcha > know. > I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away > with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to > wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, or > rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can > still pig out and not notice. > What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less > crisps. ;-)
> In message > <fb77552a-075d-457a-b022-6d109e028...@k17g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, toci > <gina...@yahoo.com> writes >>On Nov 3, 10:26 am, Gordon H <Gordon_N...@g3snx.demon.co.uk.invalid> >>wrote: >>> In message <7lb16lF391i8...@mid.individual.net>, Bobbie >>> <homefraih...@myhoose.co.uk> writes
>>> >...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put >>> >on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. >>> >I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate >>> >in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem >>> >to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I >>> >consider to be normal waist area. >>> >I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, >>> >they leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object >>> >dontcha know. >>> >I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away >>> >with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to >>> >wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, >>> >or rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can >>> >still pig out and not notice. >>> >What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less >>> >crisps. ;-)
>>> >Bobbie
>>> The latest "low-rise" jeans get Mavis in a real temper, because they are >>> so stupid; unflattering on anyone, really, especially when they stoop >>> and reveal their thongs. >>> She finds it almost impossible to find any with a decent length zip.
>>> Hint: Have you tried buying men's, and taking in the waist? >>> Only trouble is the legs are too long even for me!
>>> I get away with it because the other stupid current fashion is to wear >>> them bunched into folds on your shoes. >>> -- >>> Gordon H
>>Like grey squirrels, an importation from the mighty U.S.A.? Toci
> I don't know where these fashions originate, Toci, then there's the other > one of narrow spectacle frames, into which it's impossible to fit decent > bi-focal lenses. > -- > Gordon H > Remove "invalid" to reply
Unfortunately, that seems to be the fashion here, too. It's really difficult to find a big enough frame (I wear trifocals). Fortunately, I always keep my previous pair as a backup, so when I go to get new ones, I have them use the old frame. When they break, I'll be stuck, but maybe by then larger frames will be in fashion again.
Bobbie wrote: > ...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put > on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. > I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate > in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem > to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I > consider to be normal waist area. > I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, they > leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object dontcha > know. > I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away > with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to > wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, or > rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can > still pig out and not notice. > What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less > crisps. ;-)
> Bobbie
Heh! I really hate those low-rise jeans. Most of the women's wear seems to feature that now--and those little cap sleeves. I don't think either of them are most becoming on a woman my age.
> Bobbie wrote: >> ...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put on >> for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. >> I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate in >> jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem to >> think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I >> consider to be normal waist area. >> I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, they >> leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object dontcha >> know. >> I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away >> with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to wear >> boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, or >> rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can >> still pig out and not notice. >> What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less >> crisps. ;-)
>> Bobbie
> Heh! I really hate those low-rise jeans. Most of the women's wear seems > to feature that now--and those little cap sleeves. I don't think either > of them are most becoming on a woman my age.
> -- > Jean B.
I don't think low-rise jeans are becoming to anybody, and they look terribly uncomfortable to boot.
Joy wrote: > "Jean B." <jb...@rcn.com> wrote in message > news:7lbt3kF3chvq0U6@mid.individual.net... >> Bobbie wrote: >>> ...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put on >>> for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. >>> I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate in >>> jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem to >>> think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I >>> consider to be normal waist area. >>> I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, they >>> leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object dontcha >>> know. >>> I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away >>> with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to wear >>> boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, or >>> rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can >>> still pig out and not notice. >>> What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less >>> crisps. ;-)
>>> Bobbie >> Heh! I really hate those low-rise jeans. Most of the women's wear seems >> to feature that now--and those little cap sleeves. I don't think either >> of them are most becoming on a woman my age.
>> -- >> Jean B.
> I don't think low-rise jeans are becoming to anybody, and they look terribly > uncomfortable to boot.
> Joy
Once again we are in agreement. You don't even want to know (but can probably imagine) Leah's comments about sitting behind girls in those pants.
> Joy wrote: >> "Jean B." <jb...@rcn.com> wrote in message >> news:7lbt3kF3chvq0U6@mid.individual.net... >>> Bobbie wrote: >>>> ...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put >>>> on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. >>>> I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate >>>> in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem >>>> to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I >>>> consider to be normal waist area. >>>> I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, >>>> they leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object >>>> dontcha know. >>>> I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away >>>> with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to >>>> wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, >>>> or rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can >>>> still pig out and not notice. >>>> What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less >>>> crisps. ;-)
>>>> Bobbie >>> Heh! I really hate those low-rise jeans. Most of the women's wear >>> seems to feature that now--and those little cap sleeves. I don't think >>> either of them are most becoming on a woman my age.
>>> -- >>> Jean B.
>> I don't think low-rise jeans are becoming to anybody, and they look >> terribly uncomfortable to boot.
>> Joy > Once again we are in agreement. You don't even want to know (but can > probably imagine) Leah's comments about sitting behind girls in those > pants.
Joy wrote: > "Jean B." <jb...@rcn.com> wrote in message > news:7lc1ruF3d9i9iU5@mid.individual.net... >> Joy wrote: >>> "Jean B." <jb...@rcn.com> wrote in message >>> news:7lbt3kF3chvq0U6@mid.individual.net... >>>> Bobbie wrote: >>>>> ...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put >>>>> on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. >>>>> I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate >>>>> in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem >>>>> to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I >>>>> consider to be normal waist area. >>>>> I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, >>>>> they leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object >>>>> dontcha know. >>>>> I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away >>>>> with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to >>>>> wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, >>>>> or rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can >>>>> still pig out and not notice. >>>>> What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less >>>>> crisps. ;-)
>>>>> Bobbie >>>> Heh! I really hate those low-rise jeans. Most of the women's wear >>>> seems to feature that now--and those little cap sleeves. I don't think >>>> either of them are most becoming on a woman my age.
>>>> -- >>>> Jean B. >>> I don't think low-rise jeans are becoming to anybody, and they look >>> terribly uncomfortable to boot.
>>> Joy >> Once again we are in agreement. You don't even want to know (but can >> probably imagine) Leah's comments about sitting behind girls in those >> pants.
>> -- >> Jean B.
> LOL! Yes, I think I can imagine.
> Joy
Not a pretty sight. I can't imagine why folks would want to expose themselves that way.
Joy wrote: > "Jean B." <jb...@rcn.com> wrote in message > news:7lc1ruF3d9i9iU5@mid.individual.net... >> Joy wrote: >>> "Jean B." <jb...@rcn.com> wrote in message >>> news:7lbt3kF3chvq0U6@mid.individual.net... >>>> Bobbie wrote: >>>>> ...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put >>>>> on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. >>>>> I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate >>>>> in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem >>>>> to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I >>>>> consider to be normal waist area. >>>>> I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, >>>>> they leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object >>>>> dontcha know. >>>>> I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away >>>>> with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to >>>>> wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, >>>>> or rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can >>>>> still pig out and not notice. >>>>> What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less >>>>> crisps. ;-)
>>>>> Bobbie >>>> Heh! I really hate those low-rise jeans. Most of the women's wear >>>> seems to feature that now--and those little cap sleeves. I don't think >>>> either of them are most becoming on a woman my age.
>>>> -- >>>> Jean B. >>> I don't think low-rise jeans are becoming to anybody, and they look >>> terribly uncomfortable to boot.
>>> Joy >> Once again we are in agreement. You don't even want to know (but can >> probably imagine) Leah's comments about sitting behind girls in those >> pants.
>> -- >> Jean B.
> LOL! Yes, I think I can imagine.
> Joy
Having bought them, and because I hate waste (excuse the pun) I shall wear them with shirts tucked in and a belt or with sloppy joes. No one, will get to see my thong, I can tell you.:-) Then I will change into my luvverly comfy joggers and sigh!
> Having bought them, and because I hate waste (excuse the pun) I shall > wear them with shirts tucked in and a belt or with sloppy joes. No one, > will get to see my thong, I can tell you.:-) > Then I will change into my luvverly comfy joggers and sigh!
> Bobbie
Just in case you should think I am about to cover myself in some ground beef bun with tomato sauce, let me clarify that for you.
> "Gordon H" <Gordon_N...@g3snx.demon.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message > news:mdu0yYIRwK8KFwWs@g3snx.demon.co.uk... >> In message >> <fb77552a-075d-457a-b022-6d109e028...@k17g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, toci >> <gina...@yahoo.com> writes >>>On Nov 3, 10:26 am, Gordon H <Gordon_N...@g3snx.demon.co.uk.invalid> >>>wrote: >>>> In message <7lb16lF391i8...@mid.individual.net>, Bobbie >>>> <homefraih...@myhoose.co.uk> writes
>>>> >...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put >>>> >on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. >>>> >I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate >>>> >in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem >>>> >to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I >>>> >consider to be normal waist area. >>>> >I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, >>>> >they leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object >>>> >dontcha know. >>>> >I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away >>>> >with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to >>>> >wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, >>>> >or rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I >>>> >can >>>> >still pig out and not notice. >>>> >What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less >>>> >crisps. ;-)
>>>> >Bobbie
>>>> The latest "low-rise" jeans get Mavis in a real temper, because they >>>> are >>>> so stupid; unflattering on anyone, really, especially when they stoop >>>> and reveal their thongs. >>>> She finds it almost impossible to find any with a decent length zip.
>>>> Hint: Have you tried buying men's, and taking in the waist? >>>> Only trouble is the legs are too long even for me!
>>>> I get away with it because the other stupid current fashion is to wear >>>> them bunched into folds on your shoes. >>>> -- >>>> Gordon H
>>>Like grey squirrels, an importation from the mighty U.S.A.? Toci
>> I don't know where these fashions originate, Toci, then there's the other >> one of narrow spectacle frames, into which it's impossible to fit decent >> bi-focal lenses. >> -- >> Gordon H >> Remove "invalid" to reply
> Unfortunately, that seems to be the fashion here, too. It's really > difficult to find a big enough frame (I wear trifocals). Fortunately, I > always keep my previous pair as a backup, so when I go to get new ones, I > have them use the old frame. When they break, I'll be stuck, but maybe by > then larger frames will be in fashion again.
> Joy
I have always done that too. Unfortunately the last time I had quite a correction, and the old pair is a poor substitute. Those are also very fragile now, but they are better than nothing when traveling.
The price of glasses today is outrageous, so I am not going for a second pair just now.
> "Jean B." <jb...@rcn.com> wrote in message > news:7lbt3kF3chvq0U6@mid.individual.net... >> Bobbie wrote: >>> ...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put >>> on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. >>> I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate >>> in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem >>> to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I >>> consider to be normal waist area. >>> I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, they >>> leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object dontcha >>> know. >>> I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away >>> with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to >>> wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, or >>> rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can >>> still pig out and not notice. >>> What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less >>> crisps. ;-)
>>> Bobbie
>> Heh! I really hate those low-rise jeans. Most of the women's wear seems >> to feature that now--and those little cap sleeves. I don't think either >> of them are most becoming on a woman my age.
>> -- >> Jean B.
> I don't think low-rise jeans are becoming to anybody, and they look > terribly uncomfortable to boot.
> Joy
And for some reason, many women seem to have some strange tattoo on their lower back that they like to show off.
>>> Heh! I really hate those low-rise jeans. Most of the women's wear seems >>> to feature that now--and those little cap sleeves. I don't think either >>> of them are most becoming on a woman my age.
>>> -- >>> Jean B. >> I don't think low-rise jeans are becoming to anybody, and they look >> terribly uncomfortable to boot.
>> Joy
> And for some reason, many women seem to have some strange tattoo on their > lower back that they like to show off.
> NormaK
Mine is a teeny tiny little heart with Kiss me here.
> "Jean B." <jb...@rcn.com> wrote in message > news:7lbt3kF3chvq0U6@mid.individual.net... >> Bobbie wrote: >>> ...elasticated waisted trousers, that I know so many of us like to put >>> on for an evening of lounging, they allow one to eat too much. >>> I have invested in a couple of pairs of what I gather are the ultimate >>> in jeans. Ony trouble is I think the designers have flipped, they seem >>> to think that women's waists are now a good inch or two below what I >>> consider to be normal waist area. >>> I don't know about you, but although they fit nicely over the hips, they >>> leave the waist area free to expand. Rather defeats the object dontcha >>> know. >>> I like jeans, and I am fortunate enough to be slim enough to get away >>> with them. I particularly like the bootleg ones because I do like to >>> wear boots but they are horribly uncomfortable after an evening meal, or >>> rather they were, now without the restriction around the waist I can >>> still pig out and not notice. >>> What a waste of time. I shall go back to my expandables and eat less >>> crisps. ;-)
>>> Bobbie
>> Heh! I really hate those low-rise jeans. Most of the women's wear seems >> to feature that now--and those little cap sleeves. I don't think either >> of them are most becoming on a woman my age.
>> -- >> Jean B.
> I don't think low-rise jeans are becoming to anybody, and they look > terribly uncomfortable to boot.
> Joy
They look great on Sweet Wife. We're both glad to see them return to stores.
>> Having bought them, and because I hate waste (excuse the pun) I shall >> wear them with shirts tucked in and a belt or with sloppy joes. No one, >> will get to see my thong, I can tell you.:-) >> Then I will change into my luvverly comfy joggers and sigh!
>> Bobbie
> Just in case you should think I am about to cover myself in some ground > beef bun with tomato sauce, let me clarify that for you.
>>> Having bought them, and because I hate waste (excuse the pun) I shall >>> wear them with shirts tucked in and a belt or with sloppy joes. No one, >>> will get to see my thong, I can tell you.:-) >>> Then I will change into my luvverly comfy joggers and sigh!
>>> Bobbie
>> Just in case you should think I am about to cover myself in some ground >> beef bun with tomato sauce, let me clarify that for you.
In message <7ld0lqF3d52i...@mid.individual.net>, Bobbie <homefraih...@myhoose.co.uk> writes
>> Having bought them, and because I hate waste (excuse the pun) I shall >>wear them with shirts tucked in and a belt or with sloppy joes. No >>one, will get to see my thong, I can tell you.:-) >> Then I will change into my luvverly comfy joggers and sigh! >> Bobbie
>Just in case you should think I am about to cover myself in some ground >beef bun with tomato sauce, let me clarify that for you.
Don't forget that it is obligatory for one shoulder to be exposed by the sloppy neck slipping down. (Usually the left shoulder, I notice). -- Gordon H Remove "invalid" to reply
In message <7ldes0F3dk6a...@mid.individual.net>, Bobbie <homefraih...@myhoose.co.uk> writes
>> And for some reason, many women seem to have some strange tattoo on >>their lower back that they like to show off. >> NormaK >Mine is a teeny tiny little heart with Kiss me here. >Bobbie.
Don't all rush guys, I'm way ahead of you! -- Gordon H Remove "invalid" to reply
|
