I've lately noticed at least two types of supercilious attitudes toward our
modern TV here. I've decided to clarify matters a bit.
First, let me admit that back sometime in the 1960's, one of our network
executives was widely quoted as saying that American network TV programming
was aimed at the 8 year old mentality. So far as current network
programming is concerned, that's still pretty much true. We have programs I
find embarrassingly stupid. My only defense is the size and diversity of
our market. With well over 300 million people from every country in the
world, our common denominators are relatively low in comparison to some
smaller countries. However, current programming goes far beyond the options
of the 1960's. If all I could receive were local channels showing network
shows I doubt that I would have a TV at all. I watch little to no network
programs.
Cable and satellite dish have created a whole new world of in-home
entertainment. There are channels for every conceivable interest. There
are channels dedicated to up to the minute news, science, history, travel,
classic movies, western movies, cooking, quilting, painting, languages, live
legislation, autos and motorcycles, sporting events of every variety
imaginable, jewelry shopping, country living, home remodeling, and home
shopping just off the top of my head. There are also world-famous magazines
with their own channels like National Geographic and Smithsonian.
Criticizing us for our dearth of UK entertainment is not only insulting but
provincial. We don't live in the UK, nor do we agree that theirs is the
best entertainment possible. We have our own version of the BBC in our own
public television and radio. We even show some BBC programs here from time
to time. We just go far beyond such narrow and restrictive interests.
Modern television here is truly 'the window on the world'. I pity anyone
closing themselves off from it, and especially if they think they're above
it. In fact, it reminds me of the difference between ignorance and
stupidity.
|
