I don't get your point. One of the main features says:
"More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our socialist/communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though."
The article deals with peer review and the way specific things are presented, the cherry-picking of items out of context (like you like to do).
If you consider this revelatory, you're much simpler than you present yourself to be.
mario in victoria -- i'll sell you land in florida
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:37:33 -0500, Tristan daCunha wrote: > Hey Kate; Why are you picking on Ken? Why don't you learn to pee > standing up and take on the other guys, eh? No balls, eh? ((((((-:
It's the off season and many of the political posts get more hits than the drivel about sports. When there is actually some news about the sox, things will change for awhile.
Ken Marino wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:37:33 -0500, Tristan daCunha wrote:
>> Hey Kate; Why are you picking on Ken? Why don't you learn to pee >> standing up and take on the other guys, eh? No balls, eh? ((((((-:
> It's the off season and many of the political posts get more hits than > the drivel about sports. When there is actually some news about the > sox, things will change for awhile.
No, some people who post about non-Red Sox items here are either (a) - morons (b) - inconsiderate morons
Andrew scrawled, No, some people who post about non-Red Sox items here are either (a) - morons (b) - inconsiderate morons (c) - morons named Andrew who know Kevin Bacon ---------------------------------------------- Regards - - Andrew
> I don't get your point. One of the main features says:
> "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no > evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros > nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the > MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the > falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our > socialist/communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put > this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though."
> The article deals with peer review and the way specific things are > presented, the cherry-picking of items out of context (like you like to do).
> If you consider this revelatory, you're much simpler than you present > yourself to be.
> mario in victoria > -- > i'll sell you land in florida
Mario - please...
these turdballs arent worth your time. dont try to be intelligent here - they cant handle it.
they're too busy masterbating to pictures of Sara Palin.
nate wrote: > On Nov 20, 5:25 pm, mario in victoria <mario5...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Ken Marino wrote: >>> Another lib claim is going down the drain. Mass falsification of global >>> warming data >>>> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/11/the-cru-hack/#m... >> I don't get your point. One of the main features says:
>> "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no >> evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros >> nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the >> MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the >> falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our >> socialist/communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put >> this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though."
>> The article deals with peer review and the way specific things are >> presented, the cherry-picking of items out of context (like you like to do).
>> If you consider this revelatory, you're much simpler than you present >> yourself to be.
>> mario in victoria >> -- >> i'll sell you land in florida
> Mario - please...
> these turdballs arent worth your time. > dont try to be intelligent here - they cant handle it.
> they're too busy masterbating to pictures of Sara Palin.
Well, at least they've found a way of enjoying politics!
> On Nov 20, 5:25 pm, mario in victoria <mario5...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Ken Marino wrote: >> > Another lib claim is going down the drain. Mass falsification of global >> > warming data
>> I don't get your point. One of the main features says:
>> "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no >> evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros >> nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the >> MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the >> falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our >> socialist/communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put >> this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though."
>> The article deals with peer review and the way specific things are >> presented, the cherry-picking of items out of context (like you like to >> do).
>> If you consider this revelatory, you're much simpler than you present >> yourself to be.
>> mario in victoria >> -- >> i'll sell you land in florida
> Mario - please...
> these turdballs arent worth your time. > dont try to be intelligent here - they cant handle it.
> they're too busy masterbating to pictures of Sara Palin.
> > On Nov 20, 5:25 pm, mario in victoria <mario5...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Ken Marino wrote: > >> > Another lib claim is going down the drain. Mass falsification of global > >> > warming data
> >> I don't get your point. One of the main features says:
> >> "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no > >> evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros > >> nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the > >> MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the > >> falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our > >> socialist/communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put > >> this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though."
> >> The article deals with peer review and the way specific things are > >> presented, the cherry-picking of items out of context (like you like to > >> do).
> >> If you consider this revelatory, you're much simpler than you present > >> yourself to be.
> >> mario in victoria > >> -- > >> i'll sell you land in florida
> > Mario - please...
> > these turdballs arent worth your time. > > dont try to be intelligent here - they cant handle it.
> > they're too busy masterbating to pictures of Sara Palin.
> > - nate
> That Nate, was a very intelligent response.- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
Agreed........."masterbating" and "turdball" references always raise the bar.
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:10:01 -0800, Wayback1918 wrote: > On Nov 22, 1:39 am, "S/B 954RR" <jtibb...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> "nate" <greyst...@net1plus.com> wrote in message
>> > On Nov 20, 5:25 pm, mario in victoria <mario5...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> Ken Marino wrote: >> >> > Another lib claim is going down the drain. Mass falsification of >> >> > global warming data
>> >> I don't get your point. One of the main features says:
>> >> "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is >> >> no evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros >> >> nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of >> >> the MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of >> >> the falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our >> >> socialist/communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will >> >> put this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though."
>> >> The article deals with peer review and the way specific things are >> >> presented, the cherry-picking of items out of context (like you like >> >> to do).
>> >> If you consider this revelatory, you're much simpler than you >> >> present yourself to be.
>> >> mario in victoria >> >> -- >> >> i'll sell you land in florida
>> > Mario - please...
>> > these turdballs arent worth your time. dont try to be intelligent >> > here - they cant handle it.
>> > they're too busy masterbating to pictures of Sara Palin.
>> > - nate
>> That Nate, was a very intelligent response.- Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
> Agreed........."masterbating" and "turdball" references always raise the > bar.
Actually one notch above what we usually get from the left.
Yo; Nate is banging himself to a picture of Eric Holder. He loves Eric's new chia pet look. Kinda' like "Plugs" Biden's look. Nate says, "These two "hotties" give me strong Dem. wood"!
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:36:20 -0800, nate wrote: > On Nov 20, 5:25 pm, mario in victoria <mario5...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> Ken Marino wrote: >> > Another lib claim is going down the drain. Mass falsification of >> > global warming data
>> I don't get your point. One of the main features says:
>> "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no >> evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros >> nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the >> MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the >> falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our >> socialist/communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put >> this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though."
>> The article deals with peer review and the way specific things are >> presented, the cherry-picking of items out of context (like you like to >> do).
>> If you consider this revelatory, you're much simpler than you present >> yourself to be.
>> mario in victoria >> -- >> i'll sell you land in florida
> Mario - please...
> these turdballs arent worth your time. dont try to be intelligent here - > they cant handle it.
> they're too busy masterbating to pictures of Sara Palin.
> - nate
A lot better than you lib's masterbating to Nancy Pelosi, wouldn't you say?
Ken; Please follow....Al Gore started all this global warming crap. Next he set up a "foundation, with all kinds of regulations, fines and some such. Guess who would be the financial recipient of all this "largess"? Why, the Al Gore Inc. Foundation, of course? Do you really think that we, mere mortals, no matter how we behave....can change the pattern of nature? Of course not. But assholes like Dano, Tibbsy, and all their suckhead idiot compatriots are subscribed, til death! Til death, dude! Oh, the sky is falling! Ken, you have a level head. Don't succumb to the Snake Oil Salesmen! Follow logic, and the truth. That will set you free! And, I am no troll....merely an attitude adjuster...Peace!
> Ken; Please follow....Al Gore started all this global warming crap. > Next he set up a "foundation, with all kinds of regulations, fines and > some such. > Guess who would be the financial recipient of all this "largess"? > Why, the Al Gore Inc. Foundation, of course? Do you really think that > we, mere mortals, no matter how we behave....can change the pattern of > nature? Of course not. But assholes like Dano, Tibbsy, and all their > suckhead idiot compatriots are subscribed, til death!
Tibbsy? Not paying much attention to my posts, are you?
> Til death, dude! > Oh, the sky is falling! > Ken, you have a level head. > Don't succumb to the Snake Oil Salesmen! > Follow logic, and the truth. > That will set you free! > And, I am no troll....merely an attitude adjuster...Peace!
> "nate" <greyst...@net1plus.com> wrote in message > news:c2365bc5-e19c-4190-ae5e-0dde38e6ce07@f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >> On Nov 20, 5:25 pm, mario in victoria <mario5...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> Ken Marino wrote: >>> > Another lib claim is going down the drain. Mass falsification of >>> > global >>> > warming data
>>> I don't get your point. One of the main features says:
>>> "More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no >>> evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros >>> nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ‘get rid of the >>> MWP’, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the >>> falsifying of data, and no ‘marching orders’ from our >>> socialist/communist/vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put >>> this down to the hackers also being in on the plot though."
>>> The article deals with peer review and the way specific things are >>> presented, the cherry-picking of items out of context (like you like to >>> do).
>>> If you consider this revelatory, you're much simpler than you present >>> yourself to be.
>>> mario in victoria >>> -- >>> i'll sell you land in florida
>> Mario - please...
>> these turdballs arent worth your time. >> dont try to be intelligent here - they cant handle it.
>> they're too busy masterbating to pictures of Sara Palin.
|
