> There are some serious problems with this glowing report that gets CPS > off the hook.
> 1. While children usually tell the truth, it is how that "truth" is > obtained and then how it is interpreted. Kids want approval. > a. Interrogators of children often put suggestions into a kid's head > by the very questioning they ask. > b. What is this "truth" they speak about with kids? It all depends on > the interrogating adult's interpretation of the child's statements. > Young kids often tell the truth but in their words and from their > perspective that is not understood by the interrogator. The > interrogator takes what they say without doing any further > investigations, only use it to “prove their case.. > c. All paid employees related to CPS have a stake to make when they > make allegations, mostly because they live off the backs of kids and > family's miseries. The more they can make of allegations; the more > trauma they can cause, which is job security. Often these workers are > personally rewarded for every child they take ~ so why wouldn't they > gin up allegations when it gives them awards, a paycheck and all that > sympathy they are so holy for “protecting little babies’ when in truth > they benefit from not telling the truth?
> 2. As for all these confessions. Many people enter guilty pleas > rather than put a child through a harrowing court trial and because > they do not have the funds to adequately defend themselves. This is > always counted as a "confession" when in truth it is way for the > accused to get through the horrible ordeal of the accusations.
> 3. Allegations whether criminal or not, always stand with little way > to refute CPS. They have the unconstitutional right to interrogate > kids and then make these allegations to suit their purposes and remove > them with little scrutiny and are no hekd accountable even when they > could be proven false. These allegations false or not, last for a > lifetime for the accused, without any way to refute them.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYcQMR86ggY&feature=related
> 4. People, remember that every child taken reaps a financial reward > for the courts, CPS, and all other accusers. Federal money is given > according to how many kids have been taken. Read title IV-E, that > will spell it out as to the money allocated for foster care and > adoption ~ btw relatives usually receive NOTHING, they work for free. > A recent relative care giver made spreadsheets for the care she gave > with 24/7 care for 4 years with NO compensation. At minimum wage it > came out to over $270,000 of FREE care. Meanwhile she is at risk for > being falsely accused of neglect and maltreatment with myriads of > witnesses who know different that CPS REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE BECAUSE > IT WOULD REFUTE THEIR FALSE CHARGES.
> 5. Neither kids nor their families have decent advocates. Little kids > do not even merit an attorney for an advocate, merely volunteers whose > say in court is about the only thing counted. CASA is merely a rubber > stamp for DSHS agencies, they are not representing kids, even though > they pretend protections of the child is their mission. It is not > near any protection except for themselves and the DSHS agency. . > a. Families often cannot afford to defend themselves, especially > relative care takers and foster parents who are trying to adopt. Even > if they can afford a lawyer, he/she does not have any say in court nor > any way to refute allegations. It costs families hundreds of thousands > of dollars they do not have and CPS knows it.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaA2ohqTNsQ&feature=relatedhttp://www....
> 6. While states are strapped, this only means more reason to "get that > money" at any cost, who cares what cost it is to the child as CPS > agencies are funded on the basis of traumatizing them?. More often > than not little kids are suddenly take with no explanation nor even a > chance to say good-bye. They are then lied to about the disappearance > of the people they love. They suffer life-long trauma over this, > often detachment disorders that affect them for the rest of their > lives. As a matter of fact, when these kids are taken it AGAIN it > means another money bomb for the agencies. > a. There are indications in research that parents and families are the > best for a child, even if they have "issues." However their > "psychological evaluations" are rigged:
> 7. Shoddy "investigations" that are more like witch hunts are the > prevalent practices of CPS. The CWLA (Child Welfare League of > America) report admits that: "The findings of the federal Child and > Family Service Reviews have clearly demonstrated that the more time a > caseworker spends with a child and family, the better the outcomes for > those children and families ..." However, the case manager supported > by their offices, often refuse to do a thorough research on the > families of the children they are supposed to represent in order > to ..." Workers spend on the average of 2-4 hours per month per child > ~ and most of that is filling out paperwork that has little to do with > "spending time" with any family. Yet they count this paperwork time > as “spending time" when in fact it is not and do not even come close > to the amount of time they should spend and therefore regularly some > to "conclusions" that are terrible for the child. > a. Do *not* give the excuse that case managers have a lot of cases. > They chose this profession and chose the job. Furthermore they have a > moral obligation as they are the lynchpin (yes I spelled lynchpin > correctly, as in "lynch" as they regularly do to families) to a > child's stability with their decisions.
> 8. Terminating parental rights and adoptions is BIG BUSINESS reaping > billions of dollars per state. AFSA sets quotas for State for > kidnapping and selling kids, and if quota are exceeded they are > rewarded and can make all the false allegations they wish since they > are not held accountable CPS gets between $5000-10,000 per kid every > time they are taken and moved.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Qfbu2SxvM8&feature=related
> Do not say this is an odd case, this is just the tip of the iceberg. > Oregon state has a juvenile judge who employs almost her whole court > with her extended family: Nevada is missing millions of dollars that > are unaccounted with little oversight and NO accountability.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86IHL8L9tIo&feature=related. Nobody > watches, no official demands accountability, in all 50 states.
> So tell us again about how 'true" these allegations are when in fact > the agencies themselves get rewarded every time they twist the truth > and lie about a family, in additions to when they tell the truth and > how they "interpret" kids' statements, when in fact they are pressured > by their State to do a shoddy and incomplete job while working in a > liaise-faire agency with all the power and no accountability. False > allegations that stand without any way for the accused to refute them > happens all the time.
> And CPS affiliates merely hide behind phrases such as "in the best > interest of the child, “confidentiality” and other “reasons” to cover > up their falsehoods by refusing citizens any voice in court. If they > are so truthful why are they so afraid to publish or even release to a > court of law or the media the truth? It is an easy matter to remove > real kids and family names and replace them with aliases and done all > the time.
> I could say more but …had to comment on this transparent attempt to > legitimize CPS when in fact it is an unconstitutional entity that > profits off of kids by breaking up families in order to keep their > jobs.
> Cat in Seattle
Well said.
The person you answered appears to be Diana Napolis, famous for being a mentally ill California caseworker.
The person obsessively posts about the SAME OBSESSIONS as Diana Napolis.
The regulars here have almost given up on answering the stuff she SPAMS to various related newsgroups.
She tends to not answer questions or comments, operating in a sort of blind cult-like mode.
Learn more about her by Googling Diana Napolis or Karen "Curio" Jones one of her old alias names.
Her own blog is so mentally ill that it's funny.
CPS didn't dump her out for being so extremely mentally ill until she made national headlines and to avoid the PR disaster they dumped her.
Targeted families are regularly and routinely ordered into psych evals with no probable cause (Constitution?) but I have NEVER heard of a family succeeding at getting the caseworker ordered into a psych eval.
Of course, if they did, they would probably rig the hell out of the psych eval anyway, and if it went badly it would become almost top secret!
The caseworker's HIPAA privacy rights you know!
LOL
Could you imagine having Napolis sitting in judgement of YOUR family?
She actually believes this mentally ill crap that false allegations of child sexual abuse are extremely rare.
The CLASSIC where a 14 year old girl tells such LIES to get rid of a new stepdad because she wants Mom all to herself is well known.
Caseworkers KNOW how common that one is, although they pretend that it's not, because they take advantage of those BS cases to secure their jobs as you said.
There's a MYTH that lots of caseworkers spew that kids do not lie.
It's likewise, profitable for caseworkers to push this lie.
Another variation I've run across several times is that the case gets sorted out and Mom actually doesn't want the BRAT back because she needs to protect the OTHER kids and new stepdad from the
>> And CPS affiliates merely hide behind phrases such as "in the best >> interest of the child, =93confidentiality=94 and other =93reasons=94 to = >cover >> up their falsehoods by refusing citizens any voice in court. If they >> are so truthful why are they so afraid to publish or even release to a >> court of law or the media the truth? It is an easy matter to remove >> real kids and family names and replace them with aliases and done all >> the time.
>> I could say more but =85had to comment on this transparent attempt to >> legitimize CPS when in fact it is an unconstitutional entity that >> profits off of kids by breaking up families in order to keep their >> jobs.
>> Cat in Seattle
>Well said.
>The person you answered appears to be Diana Napolis, >famous for being a mentally ill California caseworker.
>The person obsessively posts about the >SAME OBSESSIONS as Diana Napolis.
I've never seen a post from CA about Jennifer Love Hewitt. I admit I don't read much of what CA posts, so it is possible. Could you supply the MID and.or Google link to at least one post from CA about Jennifer?
>The regulars here have almost given up on >answering the stuff she SPAMS to various >related newsgroups.
I have to give you that. Everyone has accepted CA isn't interested in the truth.
>She tends to not answer questions or comments, >operating in a sort of blind cult-like mode.
>Learn more about her by Googling Diana Napolis or >Karen "Curio" Jones one of her old alias names.
You have yet to offer any proof that CA and Diana are the same person. Their posting styles are very similar, but that doesn't make them the same person.
>Her own blog is so mentally ill that it's funny.
>CPS didn't dump her out for being so extremely mentally ill >until she made national headlines and to avoid the >PR disaster they dumped her.
>Targeted families are regularly and routinely ordered >into psych evals with no probable cause (Constitution?) >but I have NEVER heard of a family succeeding at >getting the caseworker ordered into a psych eval.
Which is just how you like it. Right, Mr. CPS?
>Of course, if they did, they would probably rig the >hell out of the psych eval anyway, and if it went >badly it would become almost top secret!
How does one rig an eval? Be specific.
>The caseworker's HIPAA privacy rights you know!
They have the same privacy rights as anyone else.
>LOL
>Could you imagine having Napolis sitting in judgement >of YOUR family?
Just mention that Jennifer Love Hewitt is an alien and she'd think you're fine.
>She actually believes this mentally ill crap >that false allegations of child sexual abuse >are extremely rare.
The stats support the claim.
>The CLASSIC where a 14 year old girl tells >such LIES to get rid of a new stepdad because >she wants Mom all to herself is well known.
It's a shame there's nothing to suggest that's all that happened with you. Oh wait, you were LYING about your case in hopes that parents would trust you and do as you suggest. Said suggestions would ensure they would lose to CPS, just as you want.
>Caseworkers KNOW how common that one is, >although they pretend that it's not, because >they take advantage of those BS cases >to secure their jobs as you said.
Is that what you do?
>There's a MYTH that lots of caseworkers >spew that kids do not lie.
Kids can and do lie. The question is, will they know enough about matters of sexual intercourse to lie about it?
>It's likewise, profitable for caseworkers to >push this lie.
Do you get a bonus for each family you tear apart, Greg?
>Another variation I've run across several times >is that the case gets sorted out and Mom >actually doesn't want the BRAT back because >she needs to protect the OTHER kids and >new stepdad from the little hellraiser.
>Ironically, the girl who falsely claimed rape >stands a BIG percentage chance of being >raped over and over in Foster care.
Please offer cites for your claim. Unless you're lying.
>It can be a nasty cosmic justice in that sort of case.
>In some of these cases, where the kid LIED >to get into foster care, her complaints about being >raped are written off as LIES, by the same >people who much earlier said that kids don't lie!
Please offer cites for your claim. Unless you're lying.
>But Diana is the most extrerme of the KOOK >caseworkers in that she genuinely sees abuse >behind almost EVERY door!
>She thinks ritual stanic child abuse is common!
Given human nature, I can accept that there are adults who abuse children in the manner most would see as Satanic ritual abuse. It would be very rare, of course.
>Can you imagine a nut case like her accusing you >of Munchausens By Proxy? I bet she did!
I've seen nothing to support that Diana has ever spoken to or about Cat. Upon what do you place your bet?
>She's never said so, but you just KNOW that >Diana claims she was abused as a child.
If she's never said so, how could she claim it?
>This kind of thing came up in discussions of >a news story recently when a kid shot >his Dad to death claiming his Dad disciplined >him too much.
>I asked if ANY kid doesn't think that ANY >discipline is too much!
And I made you look the fool you are regarding that.
>I bet EVERY kid thinks they are SO VERY >put upon, so abused when they are disciplined >in any way, spanking or not!
>It's like asking somebody if they could >use more money. Who would not say yes?
Bill Gates?
>Kids compare notes to see who's got it >the WORST, and the winner of this wierd >whiney contest is considered cool somehow.
Please offer a cite for this. Unless you're lying.
>We have an entire CULTURE of people >falsely claiming victimhood.
Gregory Scott Hanson is exhibit A.
>Whether Diana truly was abused as a child, or >whether her mental illness has her falsely >BELIEVING she was, EITHER WAY, somebody >like that should NOT be a CPS caseworker!
One of the few things upon which you and I can agree. Diana is far too unstable to be a caseworker. You have a ways to go before you reach her level of mental illness.
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON (DOB 05/22/1959) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 2 SPEED Disposition Status GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on the Child Abuse registry, for example." -- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser. Message-ID: <35120b16.0401111639.6825f...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would address the most pressing problems of our day. ... " April 2000, Gregory Hanson http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon, videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?" She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed triumphantly.
G >Well said. G > G > The person you answered appears G > to be Diana Napolis, famous for G > being a mentally ill California caseworker. G > G > The person obsessively posts about the G > SAME OBSESSIONS as Diana Napolis.
KBW > I've never seen a post from CA about KBW > Jennifer Love Hewitt. I admit I don't KBW > read much of what CA posts, so it KBW > is possible. Could you supply the KBW > MID and.or Google link to at least KBW > one post from CA about Jennifer?
This is my FAVORITE. Diana wrote to try to overturn some old research results that said that satanic child abuse does not exist. She used the pseudonym Rory Hume and complained that the professor involved wrote back to her under her real name!
She tried to complain that it was unprofessional!
Do you think some professional should take the word of some famous nutcase using a bogus name, to change their research results?
Preview Page 1 of 3 Date: Monday, April 14, 2008 10: 11 AM From: Rory Hume <Rory.H...@ucop.edu> To: Steven Beckwith <steven.beckw...@ucop.edu>, d...@cox.net Cc: Barry Klein <bmkl...@ucdavis.edu>, Bob Dynes <robert.dy...@ucop.edu> Subject: Re: Complaint about suspected Academic Fraud Excellent, Steve. Perfectly handled. Thanks. Rory On 4/14/08 9:03 AM, "Steven Beckwith" <steven.beckw...@ucop.edu> wrote: Dear Ms. Napolis, Your April 9, 2008 e-mail, copied below, to Chancellor Vanderhoef at the University of California, Davis was forwarded to me by Executive Vice President and Provost Hume here at the Office of the President. I have communicated with Vice Chancellor Barry Klein about your e-mail. In addition to serving as the Vice Chancellor for Research, Dr. Klein is the campus Institutional Official responsible for managing allegations of research misconduct made against employees of the Davis campus. I have asked him to review your allegations and to take appropriate actions based on his assessment. I expect that you will hear shortly from the campus about this matter. Sincerely, Steven Beckwith Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies Office of the President University of California ------Forwarded Message From: <d...@cox.net> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:20: 12 -0700 To: <Invanderh...@ucdavis.edu> Cc: <rory.h...@ucop.edu>, <dgres...@blumecapital.com> Subject: Complaint about suspected Academic Fraud Ritual Court Cases Project 6977 Navajo Rd. PMB 114 San Diego, California 92119-1503 619-873-5917 April 9, 2008, Per the instructions of the Office of the Secretary of the Regents, I am proceeding with a request for further administrative review of the research study, "Characteristics and Sources of Allegations of Ritualistic Child Abuse," by Dr. Gail Goodman, principal researcher at UC Davis, Phil Shaver, and Bette Bottoms, published in 1994. On July 13, 2007 I sent a series of brief questions to Gail Goodman of UC Davis requesting feedback about the issues I raised about this study in case http://webmail.west.cox.netJdo/maillmessage/preview?msgId=importantDE... 9/21/2008 Preview Page 2 ot:; I had come to any wrong conclusions. Because I received no response from Dr. Goodman, I elevated the matter to Keith Widiman, Chairman of the Psychology Department, and Steve Sheflin, Dean, who also provided no response. In December 2007 I conducted a more thorough review of this pivotal research study -which purported to find no "scientific" evidence of the satanic cult abuse of children -and discovered what I believe to be many irregularities. In lieu of a rational explanation which might explain these irregularities it appears that academic fraud occurred. My background is as a Court Intervention Social worker for Child Protective Services with a specialization in the investigation of ritual abuse. I established the Ritual Court Cases Project in 1994 and published my archive of court cases on the internet which proved the existence of SRA. This archive now includes over 80 cases and is posted at http://www.endritualabuse.org/ritualabusearchive.htm. I am now returning to my research which is, of course, lawful activity. The problems in the research study "Characteristics and Sources of Allegations of Ritualistic Child Abuse" in my opinion are many, the most outstanding of which is 1) the researchers claimed to have analyzed the legal findings of Social Services in the United States about the legal outcomes of satanic ritual abuse cases and yet there was no mention of Juvenile Court proceedings or petitions filed. Instead, the researchers used social worker case opening and closing codes which are not legal findings. 2) The researchers claimed to have discovered no scientific evidence proving intergenerational satanic cult abuse yet their perpetratorjvictim relationship scale measured only one generation. The lead researcher Gail Goodman gave an interview about this study in 1994 to New York Times reporter Daniel Goleman for his article titled "Proof Lacking for Ritual Abuse by Satanists," in which the numbers that had been analyzed in this study were grossly inflated which caused Mr. Goleman to erroneously conclude: "In a survey of more than 11,000 psychiatric and police workers throughout the country, conducted for the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, researchers found more than 12,000 accusations of group cult sexual abuse based on satanic ritual, but no one that investigators had been able to substantiate. " The above claim is a completely false statement. The researchers did not receive this high of a return rate. On January 2, 2008 I sent a 53 page critique of this study to UC Davis Vice-Chancellor Loessberg-Zahl, requesting that he address the issues that I had raised. I chose to correspond under the pseudoynm "Ellen Geykus" because I am currently on probation in San Diego County (which should end in a few months) and I did not want UC Davis officials to divert from the issues and focus on my probationary status. On February 7, 2008 I received a dismissive letter by Mr. Zahl who had discovered my real name, Diana Napolis, and addressed his letter to "Diana Napolis." In order to discover my real name, someone would have had to search the internet for my postal address. The only place on the internet which lists my postal address is at endritualabuse.org I believe this search for my real name to be also highly irregular. Ms. Zahl claimed that he had not discovered any researcher misconduct and, as I suspected would happen, Mr. Zahl informed me that he had contacted the campus police and advised me that there was no further reason to contact Dr. Goodman. My fellow colleagues and I believe that this was an attempt to intimidate me from asserting my right to question this research study. http://webmail.west.cox.net!do/mail/message/preview?msgId=importantDE... 9121/2008 Preview Page 3 of3 Because I am requesting that a serious investigation into academic fraud occur, I obviously have no interest in contacting the lead researcher. I am requesting that further review of this study take place by UC Davis Chancellor Mr. Larry Vanderholf, the Provost of Academic Affairs, Rory K. Hume, and Chairperson of the Regents office. I sent this 53 page critique as an attachment file. The questions were meant to be directed to the researchers involved via an intermediary. If the entire file is not received, please inform me and I will send it through the postal mail. Sincerely, Diana I\lapolis cc: Rory K. Hume Richard Blum ------End of Forwarded Message ------End of Forwarded Message
>G >Well said. >G > >G > The person you answered appears >G > to be Diana Napolis, famous for >G > being a mentally ill California caseworker. >G > >G > The person obsessively posts about the >G > SAME OBSESSIONS as Diana Napolis.
>KBW > I've never seen a post from CA about >KBW > Jennifer Love Hewitt. I admit I don't >KBW > read much of what CA posts, so it >KBW > is possible. Could you supply the >KBW > MID and.or Google link to at least >KBW > one post from CA about Jennifer?
>Anybody can look up Diana Napolis AKA Karen "Curio" Jones. >Almost as easily as looking up Kent Bradley Wills.
And just as easily as anyone can look up your two convictions for BEATING your ex-wife, your claim that you are on Iowa's Child Abuse Registry, and so on. What would any of it have to do with your claim that CA posts about Jennifer Love Hewitt? You did write that they obsessively post about the SAME OBSESSIONS. Are you going to offer proof of your claim, or will you continue to try and distract from it, as you did in the part of your post I snipped, since you can't prove your FACT CLAIM?
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON (DOB 05/22/1959) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 2 SPEED Disposition Status GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on the Child Abuse registry, for example." -- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser. Message-ID: <35120b16.0401111639.6825f...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would address the most pressing problems of our day. ... " April 2000, Gregory Hanson http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon, videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?" She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed triumphantly.
<greego...@gmail.com> wrote: >What are you arguing about and why, Kent?
If you didn't NEED to prove, once again, that your illegal drug use and abuse, (unless you lied about using and abusing illegal drugs) makes honesty IMPOSSIBLE for you, except by accident or force, you wouldn't have snipped where I made my possition very clear. You made the FACT CLAIM that CA and Diana are the same person. As of my writing this, you've failed to prove your claim. In fact, you've offered nothing to support your FACT CLAIM. You made the FACT CLAIM they obsessively post about the same thing. Not once has CA posted about Jennifer Love Hewitt. There is nothing to indicate that CA cares anything about JLH.
>You didn't actually LOOK at those links did you?
I did look. Nothing in them supports, let alone proves, your FACT CLAIM that CA is Diana.
Have you failed to notice that many of the claims presented by CA are no more outrageous than the vast majority of your own? Does that make you also a kook? By your standards, it should. Of course, you are psychologically UNABLE to allow yourself to be held to the same standards you DEMAND for others. You present a persona that is even more unbalanced than the one presented by CA. Get off the drugs you admit you use and abuse, then get the mental health care your years of using and abusing illegal drugs has made necessary. Be a good little monkey and RUN from the TRUTH I've presented.
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON (DOB 05/22/1959) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 2 SPEED Disposition Status GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on the Child Abuse registry, for example." -- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser. Message-ID: <35120b16.0401111639.6825f...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would address the most pressing problems of our day. ... " April 2000, Gregory Hanson http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon, videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?" She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed triumphantly.
Diana or Michelle, Could you please explain your PERSONAL connection to these issues?
The reason you push this recovered memories crap is that you're a mental case who claims to have discovered your own ""abuse"" through ""recovered memories"", right?
Did you trash your relationship with your own parents based on the hocum from some ""recovered memories"" kook?
So now you're too horrified to admit that it was all a bunch of garbage, right?
I see how in late 2008 Diana tried using a fake identity to harass a university researcher in an attempt to get them to change their results.
Diana posted the proof of this online herself!
She was put out that the professor wrote back to her using her REAL name.
She claimed this was unprofessional behavior on his part!
The research that Diana wanted to REVERSE concluded that ritual satanic child abuse does not exist.
The reason I still think you ARE Diana is that you apparently consider yourself a childadvocate.
That's a prety close match with Diana's brain rot.
What gives YOU the right to pretend you are advocating for children?
That's a classic position for the misfits at CPS.
Who ELSE would attempt to claim such a bogus aire of officialdom? (""childadvocate"")
>Diana or Michelle, Could you please explain your >PERSONAL connection to these issues?
>The reason you push this recovered memories crap >is that you're a mental case who claims to have >discovered your own ""abuse"" through >""recovered memories"", right?
>Did you trash your relationship with your >own parents based on the hocum from >some ""recovered memories"" kook?
>So now you're too horrified to admit that >it was all a bunch of garbage, right?
>I see how in late 2008 Diana tried using a fake >identity to harass a university researcher in >an attempt to get them to change their results.
>Diana posted the proof of this online herself!
What does Diana have to do with CA? Be specific and prepared to be made to look the fool. Unless you're too much a coward to answer.
>She was put out that the professor wrote >back to her using her REAL name.
>She claimed this was unprofessional behavior on his part!
>The research that Diana wanted to REVERSE >concluded that ritual satanic child abuse >does not exist.
>The reason I still think you ARE Diana is that >you apparently consider yourself a childadvocate.
Are you so screwed up from your drug use that you believe Diana is the ONLY person who can be a child advocate? Serious question.
>That's a prety close match with Diana's brain rot.
>What gives YOU the right to pretend you are >advocating for children?
>That's a classic position for the misfits at CPS.
>Who ELSE would attempt to claim such >a bogus aire of officialdom? (""childadvocate"")
Just because you HATE families, as PROVED by your extremely pro-CPS stance, doesn't mean everyone else is, Greg.
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON (DOB 05/22/1959) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 2 SPEED Disposition Status GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on the Child Abuse registry, for example." -- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser. Message-ID: <35120b16.0401111639.6825f...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would address the most pressing problems of our day. ... " April 2000, Gregory Hanson http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon, videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?" She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed triumphantly.
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:22:26 -0600, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Who ELSE would attempt to claim such >>a bogus aire of officialdom? (""childadvocate"")
> Just because you HATE families, as PROVED by your extremely >pro-CPS stance, doesn't mean everyone else is, Greg.
That sentence is just painful! I meant to write, "...doesn't mean everyone else does, Greg." I apologize for any confusion my poor proofreading may have caused.
Wikipedia: credibility just a click away Posted by Ben Pack at Oct 13, 2009 08:05 PM
Filed under: Oak Leaf, classroom journalism, SRJC, commentary In this commentary, the Oak Leaf's Ben Pack examines the Wikipedia's editorial process, concluding that the site does not deserve its reputation for being a tainted resource.
Your Philosophy teacher assigns you a research paper on some German guy named Immanuel Kant. You forget about it until the day before it’s due. After freaking out and swearing you will never procrastinate again, what is your first step?
If you are like most college students, you Google him and odds are, click on the first link, his Wikipedia page. But you hesitate. The warning words that teachers have been passed for years enter your brain. “If you get your information from Wikipedia, you’re going to get bad information.”
So here you sit with only a few hours left to write eight pages and a wealth of information in front of you that you have been told is tainted. Well I am here to tell you that Wikipedia is not only a viable source, but also may be the most important tool for a college student.
For those of you not in the know, Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia. What makes it both massive and full of useful information is also what makes it controversial. Anyone who registers for a free account can go into most stories and edit the information.
This allows good Samaritans to go in and add their carefully researched and thoughtful edits to articles, but also allows for the Scourges of the Internet to go into articles and change it to say things like, “Jay Leno died from a heroin overdose administered by JFK.”
The website urges edits to be backed up with citation, usually done by linking to another website. These links provide a point of entry for anyone who needs to do research further than the info solely offered on Wikipedia.
Many people only use these links because they are worried of what false info they might find in the actual article, but those people need to chill out and keep reading.
Wikipedia lives on the theory that there are more people who would be willing to help than people willing to harm. Most people who use Wikipedia won’t even edit it in the first place. A study by Jimmy Wales (cofounder of Wikipedia) shows that less than 1 percent of users perform more than half of the edits. Of the people who do edit articles, there are very devoted editors who take their job seriously.
What casual Wikipedia users do not know, is that your “Joe Random- Editor” does not have total editing privelages. As a matter of fact, many “high profile” articles are locked from casual editors, such as Barack Obama, God, and Wikipedia’s own Wikipedia page. This is so that people cannot go into, say, Mahatma Gandhi’s page and talk about his illegitimate love child with Marilyn Monroe.
Recently, Wikipedia has been in the news for announcing that anybody can edit an article. That means that if you spot something that you know is missing or wrong, you can fill out an edit on it and it will either be confirmed or denied by a veteran editor. This will weed out the internet crazies from the helpful people, better than your mom sorting the darks from the lights on laundry day.
Are you feeling better about Wikipedia? I hope so, because Wikipedia is one of the most helpful resources out there for any college student in a jam. Immanuel Kant once spent 10 years trying to explain both how humans acquire data and how they process data. I bet he could have got it done in five minutes using Wikipedia.
Cook County Assessor's Office: Property Search Details Property Index Number: 30-18-233-033-0000 View Property Picture View Property Map Address : 850 Buffalo Ave City : Calumet City Township : Thornton Neighborhood : 61 Taxcode : 37030 Assessed Valuation 2008 First Pass Assessment 2007 Board of Review Certified Land Assessed Value 3,025 2,521 Building Assessed Value 16,434 14,957 Total Assessed Value 19,459 17,478 Estimated Market Value 121,619 109,238 Property Characteristics Class: 2-11 Description : Two to Six Apartments, Over 62 Years Residence Type Two Story Use Multi Family Apartments Two Exterior Construction Masonry Full Baths 2 Half Baths 0 Basement1 Partial and Rec Room Attic None Central Air No Number of Fireplaces 1 Garage Size/Type2 2.5 car detached Building Square Footage: 1,752 Land Square Footage 6,304 Assessment Pass First Pass Age: 27 Land Square Footage: 6,304 1 Excluded from Building Square footage, except apartment 2 Excluded from Building Square footage
Sunday, June 10, 2007 ARRESTS Monday through Friday [ June 4 to June 8 ] Battery David Moore, 36, Calumet City
David Daniel Moore court records: David D. Moore DOB 9/26/70 850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, IL case 64D 060706FD 4989 Monday June 4th 2007 Class D Felony, Assault on somebody under 14 years old pretrial February 8th 8:30 hearing on March 12th 1PM The North Porter County complex is in Portage, Indiana 219 759 8219 no e-records, won't fax or e-mail records paid $2000 bond, Attorney Robert Harper Portage, Indiana does not have a probation officer pre-trial
http://ujsportal.pacourts.us Public Calendar schedule E-Services (button) Public Web Docket Sheets (dropdown menu) Court of Common Pleas (dropdown button CLICK)
Common Pleas Docket sheet page
Search type: CP/MP Docket Number Docket number (fill in these blanks) CP-48-CR-0002394-2002
CLICK the search button.
further down the page this appears:
CP-48-CR-0002394-2002 Comm. v. Hanson, Gregory 8/1/2002 12:00:00 AM Northampton Hanson, Gregory Christian Closed H5648506 10/17/1975
If you look closely at the left end of that there is a graphic box. Put your mouse over it and a drop down menu appears offering Docket Sheet or Court Summary Select Docket Sheet
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DOCKET Docket Number: CP-48-CR-0002394-2002 Court Case CRIMINAL DOCKET Page 1 of 17 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Gregory Christian Hanson CASE INFORMATION Judge Assigned: Moran, William F. Date Filed: 08/01/2002 Initiation Date: 08/01/2002 OTN: H5648506 Lower Court Docket No: CR-0000212-02 Initial Issuing Authority: Ralph W Litzenberger Final Issuing Authority: Ralph W Litzenberger Arresting Agency: Forks Twp Police Dept Arresting Officer: Affiant Case Local Number Type(s) Case Local Number(s) Legacy Docket Number C-48-CR-2002-2394
Northampton County Court of Common Pleas Court Summary Hanson, Gregory Christian Frackville, PA 179312699 Aliases: Hanson, Gregory Hanson, Gregory C. DOB:10/17/1975 Race:Caucasian Hair: Eyes: Sex:Male Closed Northampton CP-48-CR-0001279-1999 Arrest Dt: 05/03/1999
[ Snipped for brevity. ]
Keywords:
850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, Illinois 60409, INTERNET STALKER CON ARTIST David Daniel Moore, pathological liar David Daniel Moore, internet psychopath David Daniel Moore, hate site, sociopath stalker,pervert,creep pathological liar David Daniel Moore abusive real estate agents,deception,hacker,
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:01:56 -0800 (PST), Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>G > Kent, Do you know why this person uses >G > their own Rip Off of the Wiki name? >G > >G > Wiki rejected their crap!
Interesting. You quote something directed at me that you posted to a group you KNOW I don't read. Why do you post questions to me in a group you know I don't read? Do you think you're being clever? Do you think you'll be able to claim you've won something because I didn't respond?
>DDM > "Wiki" is the name of an open source software. >DDM > It's not an entity, stupid. It can't "reject" anything.
>So when Wiki rejected YOUR BS, Dave, who >was it that put their foot down and said no?
Prove David submitted it, a win for you, or admit your use and abuse of illegal drugs has forced you to lie once again, another loss for you.
>Was it software?
>Do you think this idiocy is enhancing your >image as a script kiddy?
Please prove David partakes in any aspect of the hacker scene, a win for you, or admit your use and abuse of illegal drugs has force you to lie once again, another loss for you.
>Aren't you underestimating just how many people >will know that you are deliberately telling lies?
Where is the lie?
>Don't you think a few people out there >will KNOW that Wiki does reject attempts >to hijack Wiki for harassment or propaganda >purposes?
I think this is well known. What does it have to do with David?
>Certainly YOU would know that, since >you made such an attempt, it got rejected.
Prove he made such an attempt, unless you're lying.
>Diana Napolis and/or this Michelle person >have similarly been rejected in such attempts.
And this means what, exactly? That you so fear the truth that you're bringing CA into a discussion that has nothing to do with her? And why are you still using and abusing illegal drugs? You've already admitted, freely, that it's your use and abuse of illegal drugs that forces you to stalk the members of alt.friends. Since you're still stalking (by the very definition you posted to accuse others of stalking you) the members, you must still be using and abusing illegal drugs. Get the help you've once again PROVED you need, Greg. I'm being very serious. I don't mean it as the insult it may appear to be.
[snip of Greg's latest PROOF that he believes he is exempt from any and all laws, copyright law in this case, and his posting of information he KNOWS isn't about the David Moore we know]
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON (DOB 05/22/1959) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 2 SPEED Disposition Status GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on the Child Abuse registry, for example." -- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser. Message-ID: <35120b16.0401111639.6825f...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would address the most pressing problems of our day. ... " April 2000, Gregory Hanson http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon, videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?" She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed triumphantly.
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:01:56 -0800 (PST), Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> >G > Kent, Do you know why this person uses > >G > their own Rip Off of the Wiki name? > >G > > >G > Wiki rejected their crap!
> Interesting. You quote something directed at me that you posted > to a group you KNOW I don't read. > Why do you post questions to me in a group you know I don't read? > Do you think you're being clever? Do you think you'll be able to > claim you've won something because I didn't respond?
> >DDM > "Wiki" is the name of an open source software. > >DDM > It's not an entity, stupid. It can't "reject" anything.
> >So when Wiki rejected YOUR BS, Dave, who > >was it that put their foot down and said no?
> Prove David submitted it, a win for you, or admit your use and > abuse of illegal drugs has forced you to lie once again, another loss > for you.
> >Was it software?
> >Do you think this idiocy is enhancing your > >image as a script kiddy?
> Please prove David partakes in any aspect of the hacker scene, a > win for you, or admit your use and abuse of illegal drugs has force > you to lie once again, another loss for you.
> >Aren't you underestimating just how many people > >will know that you are deliberately telling lies?
> Where is the lie?
> >Don't you think a few people out there > >will KNOW that Wiki does reject attempts > >to hijack Wiki for harassment or propaganda > >purposes?
> I think this is well known. > What does it have to do with David?
> >Certainly YOU would know that, since > >you made such an attempt, it got rejected.
> Prove he made such an attempt, unless you're lying.
> >Diana Napolis and/or this Michelle person > >have similarly been rejected in such attempts.
> And this means what, exactly? > That you so fear the truth that you're bringing CA into a > discussion that has nothing to do with her? > And why are you still using and abusing illegal drugs? You've > already admitted, freely, that it's your use and abuse of illegal > drugs that forces you to stalk the members of alt.friends. Since > you're still stalking (by the very definition you posted to accuse > others of stalking you) the members, you must still be using and > abusing illegal drugs. > Get the help you've once again PROVED you need, Greg. I'm being > very serious. I don't mean it as the insult it may appear to be.
> [snip of Greg's latest PROOF that he believes he is exempt from any > and all laws, copyright law in this case, and his posting of > information he KNOWS isn't about the David Moore we know]
> Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON > (DOB 05/22/1959) > CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996 > Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST > OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996 > Comments: CT 2 SPEED > Disposition Status > GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
> Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal > drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of > alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
> Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
> "My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated > in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on > the Child Abuse registry, for example." > -- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser. > Message-ID: <35120b16.0401111639.6825f...@posting.google.com>
> " ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb > minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more > minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of > the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would > address the most pressing problems of our day. ... " > April 2000, Gregory Hansonhttp://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
> With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching > into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon, > videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I > was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with > water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out > a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she > gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you > were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?" > She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I > prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
> "Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed > triumphantly.
> --a true story
Please don't cross posts any messages to alt.support.child-protective- services that don't have anything to do with child abuse.
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote: >G > Kent, Do you know why this person uses >G > their own Rip Off of the Wiki name? >G > >G > Wiki rejected their crap!
>DDM > "Wiki" is the name of an open source software. >DDM > =A0It's not an entity, stupid. It can't "reject" anything.
>So when Wiki rejected YOUR BS, Dave,
Nobody has "rejected" anything of mine. Least of all, not an inanimate piece of open source software.
> who >was it that put their foot down and said no?
>Was it software?
>Do you think this idiocy is enhancing your >image as a script kiddy?
I don't have such an image, despite the fact that Ken has given you a new phrase to try to implement.
>Aren't you underestimating just how many people >will know that you are deliberately telling lies?
As far as I can tell, that would be "none." Ken's been proved a liar so many times it's not even funny...and you're little more than a sockpuppet who reposts what he tells you to.
>Don't you think a few people out there >will KNOW that Wiki does reject attempts >to hijack Wiki for harassment or propaganda >purposes?
Not anybody with any form of intelligence. They'd be likely to comprehend that "Wiki" is a piece of software technology, and can't "reject" anything or make any decisions whatsoever.
Your statement is akin to saying that a "letter to the editor" didn't get published because "word processor technology" rejected it.
>Certainly YOU would know that, since >you made such an attempt, it got rejected.
I've made no form of "attempt," and really have no idea what you're babbling out. Can you ask Ken to clarify for you before you post again? Or, better yet, just have him post it from his Roadrunner account rather than ordering you to post it? We all know it's coming from him anyway.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com The truth about Kenneth Pangborn of KRP Consulting, 3648 Cockatoo Drive, New Port Richey, Florida
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk, but you will still be a cripple." --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **, in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
"Carol Ann you don't KNOW shit! Youy are LYING! ...... Jesus Christ you are=
one DESPICABLE CUNT!!!! ....Bitch you are GUTTER SLIME!" --Kenneth Pangborn, from a usenet argument with a female debator, highlighting his typical views on women
"Rumors about ken are true, he is a bad man. That is why both my mother and=
I ran out of there as fast as we could back in the late summer of 2002. He ruined my life and my moms life....His business is a scam, as he is in the rest of his life. He enjoys child pornography and was investigated for that=
as well....he'll call my mom 20 times a day until she answers...[Ken's sister-in-law Rebecca Reilly] wouldnt come over to our house anymore because of how he would talk to her and come on to her....and he had over 180 pictures of her on his computer" --Ken Pangborn's daughter Megan
"Blood, breath or urine?" --question to Ken Pangborn from a Florida police officer in November 2008, during a traffic stop from which Pangborn was subsequently charged with DUI**
"...beating [some kids] into a bloody pulp is the ONLY thing=20 that would get through to them."=20 --Ken Pangborn on child rearing
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations=
of child abuse,false rape allegations,false abuse accusations,false accusations,recovered memories,child sexual abuse,abuse child,sexual assault,child molestation,reactive attachment disorder,penile plethysmograph,polygraph,attorneys,divorce,visitation,pedophiles, thinking about hiring ken pangborn,florida trial consulting,florida false allegations,child abuse,brianna bragg More-keywords: KRP CONSULTING. False allegations of child abuse, false abuse accusations, false domestic violence allegations help, false rape allegations, abuse child, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, false allegations, false accusations, recovered memories, sexual assault, child molestation, child sexual abuse, reactive attachment disorder, penile plethysmograph, polygraph, trial consulting, jury consulting, jury selection, jury voire dire, wrongful allegations, false child sexual abuse allegations. Wrongful child sexual abuse allegations. Domestic Violence. Rape. Marital rape. Date Rape. Confidence Rape. Yet-more-keywords: ken pangborn,kenneth pangborn,barbara pangborn,barbara sanciprian,palm harbor,tampa,attorneys,florida lawyers,florida attorneys,tampa lawyers,tampa attorneys,trial consultant,trial consulting,dui,domestic violence,vawa,abuse,3648 cockatoo,new port richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis ross,liana yisell alvarez silveira,madelyn tamayo,manuel toledo,thais valdes Extra-keywords: Julito Sainz,craig clawson,lia yisell
Cook County Assessor's Office: Property Search Details Property Index Number: 30-18-233-033-0000 View Property Picture View Property Map Address : 850 Buffalo Ave City : Calumet City Township : Thornton Neighborhood : 61 Taxcode : 37030 Assessed Valuation 2008 First Pass Assessment 2007 Board of Review Certified Land Assessed Value 3,025 2,521 Building Assessed Value 16,434 14,957 Total Assessed Value 19,459 17,478 Estimated Market Value 121,619 109,238 Property Characteristics Class: 2-11 Description : Two to Six Apartments, Over 62 Years Residence Type Two Story Use Multi Family Apartments Two Exterior Construction Masonry Full Baths 2 Half Baths 0 Basement1 Partial and Rec Room Attic None Central Air No Number of Fireplaces 1 Garage Size/Type2 2.5 car detached Building Square Footage: 1,752 Land Square Footage 6,304 Assessment Pass First Pass Age: 27 Land Square Footage: 6,304 1 Excluded from Building Square footage, except apartment 2 Excluded from Building Square footage
Sunday, June 10, 2007 ARRESTS Monday through Friday [ June 4 to June 8 ] Battery David Moore, 36, Calumet City
David Daniel Moore court records: David D. Moore DOB 9/26/70 850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, IL case 64D 060706FD 4989 Monday June 4th 2007 Class D Felony, Assault on somebody under 14 years old pretrial February 8th 8:30 hearing on March 12th 1PM The North Porter County complex is in Portage, Indiana 219 759 8219 no e-records, won't fax or e-mail records paid $2000 bond, Attorney Robert Harper Portage, Indiana does not have a probation officer pre-trial
http://ujsportal.pacourts.us Public Calendar schedule E-Services (button) Public Web Docket Sheets (dropdown menu) Court of Common Pleas (dropdown button CLICK)
Common Pleas Docket sheet page
Search type: CP/MP Docket Number Docket number (fill in these blanks) CP-48-CR-0002394-2002
CLICK the search button.
further down the page this appears:
CP-48-CR-0002394-2002 Comm. v. Hanson, Gregory 8/1/2002 12:00:00 AM Northampton Hanson, Gregory Christian Closed H5648506 10/17/1975
If you look closely at the left end of that there is a graphic box. Put your mouse over it and a drop down menu appears offering Docket Sheet or Court Summary Select Docket Sheet
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DOCKET Docket Number: CP-48-CR-0002394-2002 Court Case CRIMINAL DOCKET Page 1 of 17 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Gregory Christian Hanson CASE INFORMATION Judge Assigned: Moran, William F. Date Filed: 08/01/2002 Initiation Date: 08/01/2002 OTN: H5648506 Lower Court Docket No: CR-0000212-02 Initial Issuing Authority: Ralph W Litzenberger Final Issuing Authority: Ralph W Litzenberger Arresting Agency: Forks Twp Police Dept Arresting Officer: Affiant Case Local Number Type(s) Case Local Number(s) Legacy Docket Number C-48-CR-2002-2394
Northampton County Court of Common Pleas Court Summary Hanson, Gregory Christian Frackville, PA 179312699 Aliases: Hanson, Gregory Hanson, Gregory C. DOB:10/17/1975 Race:Caucasian Hair: Eyes: Sex:Male Closed Northampton CP-48-CR-0001279-1999 Arrest Dt: 05/03/1999
[ Snipped for brevity. ]
Keywords:
850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, Illinois 60409, INTERNET STALKER CON ARTIST David Daniel Moore, pathological liar David Daniel Moore, internet psychopath David Daniel Moore, hate site, sociopath stalker,pervert,creep pathological liar David Daniel Moore abusive real estate agents,deception,hacker, sexual blackmail David Daniel Moore coward, tara moreland, Linda Boss, janet m moore, dawn moore, tara moreland, alias dustin calloway, alias david miller, alias david boss, alias jeff johnson, criminal, computer hacker, criminal hacker, internet stalkers, stalker, internet harassment, usenet threats usenet forgery David Daniel Moore, forger, new zealand hate site, internet libel website of lies, chicagoland pansies malicious use of employers computers, formerly of Sara Lee Corporation, child abuser, sara lee corporation, never employ this temp, internet psychopaths, internet addiction, internet stalking, woman hater, blackmailer, sexual harassment, stalker, sexual blackmail, David Daniel Moore bbs blackmail,usmc 29 palms, discharge for the good of the service, linda boss, formerly of Sara Lee Corporation, short term contract programmer lotus, David Moore lives in his mommy's basement, 850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, Illinois 60409, temp worker, lotus consultant, temp worker, short term contracts,IP address trickery, casino software consultant moral terpitude, computer identity forgery, mommys basement, anonymous remailer stalkers, office disruption, anonymous remailer abusers, coalition forces, David Daniel Moore basement dweller, off shore website avid Daniel Moore, new zealand, malaysia website, David Daniel Moore employer computer abuse, obsessive compulsive disorder
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:General_disclaimer WIKIPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY "Please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information."
"However, Wikipedia cannot guarantee the validity of the information found here. The content of any given article may recently have been changed, vandalized or altered by someone whose opinion does not correspond with the state of knowledge in the relevant fields."
"Wikipedia is not uniformly peer reviewed; while readers may correct errors or engage in casual peer review, they have no legal duty to do so and thus all information read here is without any implied warranty of fitness for any purpose or use whatsoever."
-- Basic points about wikipedia
1) There is no guarantee its information is correct.
2) Its editors are anonymous and may be biased about the topic they are writing about and may be unqualified to write encyclopedia articles.
3) There is inconsistent or no fact checking, depending on the article.
4) The rules of wikipedia at times are used to control article content and delete other content from strong sources.
5) Experts working on certain topics in wikipedia may be derided and discouraged from contributing to certain articles.
Therefore, one is probably better off reading a real encyclopedia or journal article, due to the high potential for reading inaccurate information and a slanted or biased article. --
There have been problems with wikipedia in the past that have found it to be an unreliable source of information and editor bias can help shape articles to the views of the more powerful editors there.
These problems include:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6947532.stm Wikipedia 'shows CIA page edits' An online tool that claims to reveal the identity of organisations that edit Wikipedia pages has revealed that the CIA was involved in editing entries.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/22/wikipedia_vandalism_crackdown/ Jimbo Wales ends death by Wikipedia Kennedy murder shames online cult By Cade Metz in San Francisco On Tuesday afternoon, following a Washington luncheon celebrating the inauguration of President Barack Obama, longtime US Senators Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd kicked the proverbial bucket. At least, that's what happened in Wikiland. In our world, they're still among the living.
Wikipedia black helicopters circle Utah's Traverse Mountain http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/ Wikipedia is not a democracy. But the totalitarian attitudes of the site's ruling clique go much further than Jimbo cares to acknowledge. In early September, the Wikipedia inner circle banned edits from 1,000 homes and one massive online retailer in an attempt to suppress the voice of one man.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bomis Bomis is a dot-com company founded in 1996. Its primary business is the sale of advertising on the Bomis.com search portal. It was founded by Jimmy Wales and Tim Shell, and provided support for the free encyclopedia projects Nupedia and Wikipedia.... Bomis ran a website called Bomis Premium at premium.bomis.com until 2005, offering customers access to premium, X-rated[3] pornographic content.
The word on Wikipedia: Trust but verify Popular online encyclopedia, plagued by errors, troubles educators By Lisa Daniels and Alex Johnson msnbc.com and NBC News March. 29, 2007 Lisa Daniels Correspondent MIDDLEBURY, Vt. - Neil Waters had never seen anything quite like it. “I was looking at a stack of final examinations,” said Waters, a professor of Japanese studies at Middlebury College in Vermont, “and I found several instances of misinformation that [were] identical from one student to another.” All of those students in Waters’ Japanese history class late last year had been steered wrong by the same source — Wikipedia, the sprawling online encyclopedia that has revolutionized how ordinary people find information.... For Middlebury College’s history department, the answer is plain: Not totally, and not always. The department banned students from using it as a source in their papers, although they are allowed to consult it for background material, a move that was quickly mimicked by professors at other schools, including UCLA and the University of Pennsylvania.... Just this year, a Wikipedia entry falsely proclaimed that the comedian Sinbad was dead. (“Saturday, I rose from the dead,” he said.) Golfer Fuzzy Zoeller sued last month to find out who anonymously posted, falsely, that he abused drugs. And a prolific and highly trusted contributor believed to be a professor was unmasked as a 24-year-old college dropout. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17740041/
10 Questions: Jimmy Wales 3/21/07 How can I persuade my teachers to allow me to use Wikipedia as a legitimate research source?—Kaitlyn Grigsby, Medina, Ohio I would agree with your teachers that that isn't the right way to use Wikipedia. The site is a wonderful starting point for research. But it's only a starting point because there's always a chance that there's something wrong, and you should check your sources if you are writing a paper. http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1601491,00.html
One great source -- if you can trust it By Hiawatha Bray, Globe Staff | July 12, 2004 So of course Wikipedia is popular. Maybe too popular. For it lacks one vital feature of the traditional encyclopedia: accountability. Old- school reference books hire expert scholars to write their articles, and employ skilled editors to check and double-check their work. Wikipedia's articles are written by anyone who fancies himself an expert....
Ross admits to reading and enjoying Wikipedia, and has even gotten ideas there for future Britannica articles. But the absence of traditional editorial controls makes Wikipedia unsuited to serious research. "How do they know it's accurate?" Ross asks. "People can put down anything." http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2004/07/12/one_gre...
See Who's Editing Wikipedia - Diebold, the CIA, a Campaign By John Borland 08.14.07 Wikipedia Scanner -- the brainchild of Cal Tech computation and neural- systems graduate student Virgil Griffith -- offers users a searchable database that ties millions of anonymous Wikipedia edits to organizations where those edits apparently originated, by cross- referencing the edits with data on who owns the associated block of internet IP addresses.... The online encyclopedia allows anyone to make edits, but keeps detailed logs of all these changes. Users who are logged in are tracked only by their user name, but anonymous changes leave a public record of their IP address.... Griffith thus downloaded the entire encyclopedia, isolating the XML- based records of anonymous changes and IP addresses. He then correlated those IP addresses with public net-address lookup services such as ARIN, as well as private domain-name data provided by IP2Location.com. The result: A database of 34.4 million edits, performed by 2.6 million organizations or individuals ranging from the CIA to Microsoft to Congressional offices, now linked to the edits they or someone at their organization's net address has made. Some of this appears to be transparently self-interested, either adding positive, press release-like material to entries, or deleting whole swaths of critical material. http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/2007/08/wiki_tracker
Wikipedia and Beyond Jimmy Wales' sprawling vision Katherine Mangu-Ward | June 2007 Print Edition "Wales moved to Chicago and became a futures and options trader. After six years of betting on interest rates and currency fluctuations, he made enough money to pay the mortgage for the rest of his life. In 1998 he moved to San Diego and started a Web portal, Bomis, which featured, among other things, a "guy-oriented search engine" and pictures of scantily clad women. The en déshabillé ladies have since caused trouble for Wales, who regularly fields questions about his former life as a "porn king." In a typically blunt move, Wales often responds to criticism of his Bomis days by sending reporters links to Yahoo's midget porn category page. If he was a porn king, he suggests, so is the head of the biggest Web portal in the world. Bomis didn't make it big-it was no Yahoo-but in March 2000 the site hosted Nupedia, Wales' first attempt to build a free online encyclopedia. Wales hired Larry Sanger, at the time a doctoral candidate in philosophy at Ohio State, to edit encyclopedia articles submitted voluntarily by scholars, and to manage a multistage peer review process." "Wikipedia does fail sometimes. The most famous controversy over its accuracy boiled over when John Seigenthaler Sr., a former assistant to Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, wrote about his own Wikipedia entry in a November 2005 USA Today op-ed. The entry on Seigenthaler included a claim that he had been involved in both Kennedy assassinations. "We live in a universe of new media," wrote Seigenthaler, "with phenomenal opportunities for worldwide communications and research-but populated by volunteer vandals with poison-pen intellects." The false claim had been added to the entry as a prank in May 2005. When Seigenthaler contacted Wikipedia about the error in October, Wales personally took the unusual step of removing the false allegations from the editing history on the page, wiping out the publicly accessible records of the error. "Wikipedia's other major scandal hasn't been quite as easy for Wales to laugh off, because he was the culprit. In 2005 he was caught with his hand on the edit button, taking
Discussion subject changed to "Loftus' work has been rebutted. Her work has been misinterpreted and overextrapolated to imply that it applies to traumatic memory." by childadvocate
Loftus' work has been fully rebutted. There are many "experts" in the field of memory. Her work has been misinterpreted and overextrapolated to imply that it applies to traumatic memory. Traumatic memory is stored differently in the brain. Studies on "regular" memory do NOT apply to traumatic memory.
van der Kolk, B. A. & Fisler, R. (1995) Dissociation and the fragmentary nature of traumatic memories: Overview and exploratory study. http://www.trauma-pages.com/a/vanderk2.php
Loftus is very biased in her interpretation of traumatic memory. There is NO evidence that traumatic memory can be created through manipulation.
Loftus' work has been heavily critiqued.
Several studies and authors have found significant flaws in the Loftus' Lost in the Mall study. A similar study by Pezdek in 1995 found that none of the study participants accepted an erroneous memory that they had received a painful enema as a child.[1][2] Crook states that the Lost in a Shopping Mall study’s application to therapy situations appears to be “limited to a narrowly defined and perhaps even unlikely situation” and states that the study’s “internal scientific methodological errors cast doubt on the validity of the claims” of the study.[3] [1]Crook also states that it has been demonstrated that the “methods, data, and assumptions in the mall study have not been subjected to rigorous scientific scrutiny” yet its results have been reported to the media to support the claim that “therapists can implant false memories of childhood trauma.”[2] Pope also questions the study. He questions the analogy of a memory of being lost in the mall as being equivalent to that of child rape. He also talks about the problem of confounding variables in the study. If an older family member claims to have seen the “false” memory, can a therapist make the same claim? And should this research be applied to “false” memories in therapy?[4][5] Others have also critiqued Loftus’ scholarship and accuracy[6] or that Loftus’ has done research that may contradict her own beliefs of recovered memories. [7]
References
1 Pezdek, K; Hodge, D. (July-August 1999). "Planting false childhood memories: The role of event plausibility". Child Development 70 (4): 887–895. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00064. Retrieved on 2008-01-30. “This experiment tested and supported the hypothesis that events will be suggestively planted in children's memory to the degree that the suggested event is plausible and script-relevant knowledge exists in memory.”
2 K. Pezdek, Planting False Childhood Memories: When Does It Occur and When Does It Not? paper presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomics Society (Nov. 10-12, 1995) cited in Murphy, Wendy J. (1997).Debunking "false memory" myths in sexual abuse cases.Trial: Journal of the Association of Trial Lawyers of America, November, 1997. Retrieved June 05, 2008
3 Crook, L. (1999). "Lost in a Shopping Mall--A Breach of Professional Ethics.". Ethics & Behavior. 9 (1): 39–50. doi:10.1207/ s15327019eb0901_3. Retrieved on 2008-01-18. “An analysis of the mall study shows that beyond the external misrepresentations, internal scientific methodological errors cast doubt on the validity of the claims that have been attributed to the mall study within scholarly and legal arenas. The minimal involvement——or, in some cases, negative impact——of collegial consultation, academic supervision, and peer review throughout the evolution of the mall study are reviewed.”
4 Pope, K. (1996). "Memory, Abuse, and Science: Questioning Claims About the False Memory Syndrome Epidemic". American Psychologist 51: 957. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.9.957. Retrieved on 2008-01-31. “Does the trauma specified in the lost-in-the-mall experiment seem comparable to the trauma forming the basis of false memory syndrome? Loftus (1993) described the implanted traumatic event in the shopping- mall experiment as follows: "Chris was convinced by his older brother Jim, that he had been lost in a shopping mall when he was five years old" (p. 532). Does this seem, for example, a reasonable analogy for a five-year-old girl being repeatedly raped by her father?....Is it possible that the findings are an artifact of this particular design, for example, that the older family member claims to have been present when the event occurred and to have witnessed it, a claim the therapist can never make? To date, replications and extensions of this study have tended to use a similar methodology; that is, either the older family member makes the suggestions in his or her role as the experimenter's confederate, or the experimenter presents the suggestion as being the report of an older family member, thus creating a surrogate confederate.”
5 "Memory, Abuse, & Science: Questioning Claims about the False Memory Syndrome Epidemic" (1996). American Psychologist vol. 51, no. 9: pp 957–974..
6 Jennifer Hoult, Esq.. "Consider the Evidence for Elizabeth Loftus' Scholarship and Accuracy "Remembering Dangerously" & Hoult v. Hoult: The Myth of Repressed Memory that Elizabeth Loftus Created".
7 Hopper, J.. "Recovered Memories of Sexual Abuse Scientific Research & Scholarly Resources". "Loftus has conducted and published research which calls into question her public statements on recovered memories; her own study demonstrated that the conditions of amnesia and delayed recall for sexual abuse do exist"
--
Elizabeth Loftus herself has published studies showing evidence of recovered memory. The 4 January 1996 issue of Accuracy About Abuse notes: Elizabeth Loftus, high profile FMSF advocate, published a paper with colleagues on Remembering and Repressing in 1994. In a study of 105 women outpatients in a substance abuse clinic 54 % reported a history of childhood sexual abuse. 81% remembered all or part of the abuse. 19% reported they forgot the abuse for a period of time and later the memory returned. Women who remembered the abuse their whole lives reported a clearer memory, with a more detailed picture. Women who remembered the abuse their whole lives did not differ from others in terms of the violence of the abuse or whether the violence was incestuous. [Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18 (1994) 67-84.]
Loftus has also discussed "motivated forgetting", and has presented the documented study of a college professor who became unable to remember a series of traumas, but after some time was able to recover those memories. Loftus remarked "after such an enormously stressful experience, many individuals wish to forget... And often their wish is granted." (Loftus, 1980/1988, p. 73)" http://web.archive.org/web/20030608221633/http://www.feminista.com/v1...
"The hypothesis that false memories can easily be implanted in psychotherapy (Lindsay & Read, 1994; Loftus 1993; Loftus & Ketcham, 1994; Ofshe and Watters, 1993, 1994; Yapko, 1994a) seriously overstates the available data. Since no studies have been conducted on suggested effects in psychotherapy per se, the idea of iatrogenic suggestion of false memories remains an untested hypothesis. (Memory, Trauma Treatment, And the Law Brown, Scheflin and Hammond (D. Corydon), 1998, W. W. Norton 0-393-70254-5)
http://www.jimhopper.com/memory/#el Elizabeth Loftus Loftus is aware that those who study traumatic memory have for several years, based on a great deal of research and clinical experience, used the construct of dissociation to account for the majority of recovered memories. However, she continues to focus on and attack "repression" and "repressed memories," which has the effect of confusing and misleading many people.
http://users.owt.com/crook/memory/ "Lost in a Shopping Mall"—A Breach of Professional Ethics ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, vol. 9, #1, pp. 39-50 The "lost in a shopping mall" study has been cited to support claims that psychotherapists can implant memories of false autobiographical information of childhood trauma in their patients. The mall study originated in 1991 as 5 pilot experiments involving 3 children and 2 adult participants. The University of Washington Human Subjects Committee granted approval for the mall study on August 10, 1992. The preliminary results with the 5 pilot subjects were announced 4 days later. An analysis of the mall study shows that beyond the external misrepresentations, internal scientific methodological errors cast doubt on the validity of the claims that have been attributed to the mall study within scholarly and legal arenas. The minimal involvement— or, in some cases, negative impact—of collegial consultation, academic supervision, and peer review throughout the evolution of the mall study are reviewed.
--- "Elizabeth Loftus has been considerd the LEADING expert in the world on the subject of human memory."
|
