Re: Rookie Judge Peter Leask Aquits Hell's Angel Glen Jonathan Hehn And Uses Profane Language
Sweh-T <some...@microsoft.com>
I completely agree, this judge is an embarassment.
I hope the crown appeals. I think the judge is either under 'pressure' from
the HA or is completely out to lunch. But there's no way he made the
decisions he did in sound mind.
Something real fucking fishy going on.
"Greg Carr" <gregcarrso
...@gmail.com> wrote in message
...
======================================================================T
The above story was on the front page of the Vancouver Sun today and
is on the Canada.com website. I have never heard of a case where a
judge in BC or Canada used profane language let alone a Supreme Court
Judge. Peter Leask is an embarresment to the legal profession and the
judiciary and should be removed from the bench. Judges who use profane
language have no place in the courtrooms in Canada. Why a Supreme
Court Judge would be surprised that a HA full patch would be out of
his mind is beyond me. Members of the Hell's Angels are well known for
their use of cocaine and meth and alcohol and even drugs such as LSD.
It isn't the least surprising that Mr. Hehn would use his own name for
a storage locker in which he had cocaine. This judge is either
amazingly stupid or is corrupt or he is in fear of being gang raped.
In any case I have never heard of another case where someone had care
and control of a storage locker in their legal name and were seen at
the location and cocaine was found there being acquited. Hopefully the
Canadian Judicial Council will call for Leask to be removed from the
bench and the Crown will appeal this sentence. This case only came
about because two RCMP officers decided to act on a hunch and
investigate two suspicious men. Good work and hopefully these men will
ask publicly for this useless excuse of a judge to be removed from the
bench.
Feel free to contact the Canadian Judiacry Council yourself.
