On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:20:32 -0800 (PST), Greegor <greego
...@gmail.com>
wrote:
[...]
>> And CPS affiliates merely hide behind phrases such as "in the best
>> interest of the child, =93confidentiality=94 and other =93reasons=94 to =
>cover
>> up their falsehoods by refusing citizens any voice in court. If they
>> are so truthful why are they so afraid to publish or even release to a
>> court of law or the media the truth? It is an easy matter to remove
>> real kids and family names and replace them with aliases and done all
>> the time.
>> I could say more but =85had to comment on this transparent attempt to
>> legitimize CPS when in fact it is an unconstitutional entity that
>> profits off of kids by breaking up families in order to keep their
>> jobs.
>> Cat in Seattle
>Well said.
>The person you answered appears to be Diana Napolis,
>famous for being a mentally ill California caseworker.
>The person obsessively posts about the
>SAME OBSESSIONS as Diana Napolis.
I've never seen a post from CA about Jennifer Love Hewitt. I
admit I don't read much of what CA posts, so it is possible.
Could you supply the MID and.or Google link to at least one post
from CA about Jennifer?
I have to give you that. Everyone has accepted CA isn't
interested in the truth.
>She tends to not answer questions or comments,
>operating in a sort of blind cult-like mode.
>Learn more about her by Googling Diana Napolis or
>Karen "Curio" Jones one of her old alias names.
You have yet to offer any proof that CA and Diana are the same
person.
Their posting styles are very similar, but that doesn't make them
the same person.
>Her own blog is so mentally ill that it's funny.
>CPS didn't dump her out for being so extremely mentally ill
>until she made national headlines and to avoid the
>PR disaster they dumped her.
>Targeted families are regularly and routinely ordered
>into psych evals with no probable cause (Constitution?)
>but I have NEVER heard of a family succeeding at
>getting the caseworker ordered into a psych eval.
Which is just how you like it. Right, Mr. CPS?
>Of course, if they did, they would probably rig the
>hell out of the psych eval anyway, and if it went
>badly it would become almost top secret!
How does one rig an eval? Be specific.
>The caseworker's HIPAA privacy rights you know!
They have the same privacy rights as anyone else.
>LOL
>Could you imagine having Napolis sitting in judgement
>of YOUR family?
Just mention that Jennifer Love Hewitt is an alien and she'd
think you're fine.
>She actually believes this mentally ill crap
>that false allegations of child sexual abuse
>are extremely rare.
The stats support the claim.
>The CLASSIC where a 14 year old girl tells
>such LIES to get rid of a new stepdad because
>she wants Mom all to herself is well known.
It's a shame there's nothing to suggest that's all that happened
with you.
Oh wait, you were LYING about your case in hopes that parents
would trust you and do as you suggest. Said suggestions would ensure
they would lose to CPS, just as you want.
>Caseworkers KNOW how common that one is,
>although they pretend that it's not, because
>they take advantage of those BS cases
>to secure their jobs as you said.
Is that what you do?
>There's a MYTH that lots of caseworkers
>spew that kids do not lie.
Kids can and do lie. The question is, will they know enough
about matters of sexual intercourse to lie about it?
>It's likewise, profitable for caseworkers to
>push this lie.
Do you get a bonus for each family you tear apart, Greg?
>Another variation I've run across several times
>is that the case gets sorted out and Mom
>actually doesn't want the BRAT back because
>she needs to protect the OTHER kids and
>new stepdad from the little hellraiser.
>Ironically, the girl who falsely claimed rape
>stands a BIG percentage chance of being
>raped over and over in Foster care.
Please offer cites for your claim. Unless you're lying.
>It can be a nasty cosmic justice in that sort of case.
>In some of these cases, where the kid LIED
>to get into foster care, her complaints about being
>raped are written off as LIES, by the same
>people who much earlier said that kids don't lie!
Please offer cites for your claim. Unless you're lying.
>But Diana is the most extrerme of the KOOK
>caseworkers in that she genuinely sees abuse
>behind almost EVERY door!
>She thinks ritual stanic child abuse is common!
Given human nature, I can accept that there are adults who abuse
children in the manner most would see as Satanic ritual abuse. It
would be very rare, of course.
>Can you imagine a nut case like her accusing you
>of Munchausens By Proxy? I bet she did!
I've seen nothing to support that Diana has ever spoken to or
about Cat.
Upon what do you place your bet?
>She's never said so, but you just KNOW that
>Diana claims she was abused as a child.
If she's never said so, how could she claim it?
>This kind of thing came up in discussions of
>a news story recently when a kid shot
>his Dad to death claiming his Dad disciplined
>him too much.
>I asked if ANY kid doesn't think that ANY
>discipline is too much!
And I made you look the fool you are regarding that.
>I bet EVERY kid thinks they are SO VERY
>put upon, so abused when they are disciplined
>in any way, spanking or not!
>It's like asking somebody if they could
>use more money. Who would not say yes?
Bill Gates?
>Kids compare notes to see who's got it
>the WORST, and the winner of this wierd
>whiney contest is considered cool somehow.
Please offer a cite for this. Unless you're lying.
>We have an entire CULTURE of people
>falsely claiming victimhood.
Gregory Scott Hanson is exhibit A.
>Whether Diana truly was abused as a child, or
>whether her mental illness has her falsely
>BELIEVING she was, EITHER WAY, somebody
>like that should NOT be a CPS caseworker!
One of the few things upon which you and I can agree. Diana is
far too unstable to be a caseworker.
You have a ways to go before you reach her level of mental
illness.
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.0401111639.6825f...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.goo gle.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <greego...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-pr otective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
|
