That God will do anything for a laugh! Even though we KNOW that
evolution is false, he keeps giving us all this silly fake evidence to
trick us. This time, I almost fell for it...
On Nov 19, 9:05 am, Drafterman <drafter...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Drafterman <drafter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://tiny.cc/raaud
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Atheism vs Christianity" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> atheism-vs-christianity@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> atheism-vs-christianity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<atheism-vs-christianit y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/atheism-vs-christianity?hl=.
since only a fool thinks God is creator as in the scriptures we see it
is the hearsay of the pagans that did not know how to read or write
and were not ever in contact with IAM or inside the Garden..so what
fools in the mountains say about IAM is what you follow and like the
dummy that cheats and copies off the worst student in class you too
become the worst student in class.
try to know how to read in life and not read and think as complete
idiot that all the words are from God.
On Nov 19, 12:29 pm, flying gorilla <ryan.kle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That God will do anything for a laugh! Even though we KNOW that
> evolution is false, he keeps giving us all this silly fake evidence to
> trick us. This time, I almost fell for it...
> On Nov 19, 9:05 am, Drafterman <drafter...@gmail.com> wrote:
This is an excellent example of finches turning into slightly
different coloured finches. No new features, no new functions, no new
anything - just a hybridisation between two pre-existing birds.
Please explain how it represents an indication that the same finches
could have arisen from - say - a small dinosaur (or any other
ancestral creature, take your pick).
> This is an excellent example of finches turning into slightly
> different coloured finches. No new features, no new functions, no new
> anything - just a hybridisation between two pre-existing birds.
> Please explain how it represents an indication that the same finches
> could have arisen from - say - a small dinosaur (or any other
> ancestral creature, take your pick).
Tell me something, JT -
Since your objection to evolution is entirely based on faith, why do
you pretend to care about the details of the scientific explanation?
I imagine Draftie will answer your question, as could I or any number
of other people, but it seems kind of futile. You don't believe in
evolution because it doesn't match your concept of God, and your faith
in God is very important to you. Why should we explain the science,
as worked out by thousands of devoted scientists both theist and non-
theist over the past century and a half, when you're just going to
wave your hands and rationalize it all away?
I find you quite a disappointment, JT. You're clearly intelligent,
and yet you can't see what's right in front of your eyes. Literally
millions of scientists, many of whom are your fellow Christians, would
have to be wrong or lying for the Bible to be literally correct about
the age of the Earth. There is no more scientific doubt about
evolution or the age of the Earth than there is about the germ theory
of disease or heliocentrism (to name two other scientific facts that
contradict a literal reading of the Bible.)
Many millions of Christians believe in both God and evolution. You
could, too.
On 19 nov, 17:22, Trance Gemini <trancegemi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Interesting. Thanks!
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Drafterman <drafter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >http://tiny.cc/raaud
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Atheism vs Christianity" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
> > atheism-vs-christianity@googlegroups.com.
So long an essay, dear sir and good friend, you have elicited from me
with your booklet in which aATHEIST demonstrates his skill in a debate
with an absent Christian. He would not, thank God, do this in my
presence! My essay, I hope, will furnish a Christian (who in any case
has no desire to become a ATHEIST) with enough material not only to
defend himself against the blind, venomousATHEIST, but also to become
the foe of theATHEIST' malice, lying, and cursing, and to understand
not only that their belief is false but that they are surely possessed
by all devils. May Christ, our dear Lord, convert them mercifully and
preserve us steadfastly and immovably in the knowledge of him, which
is eternal life. Amen.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > atheism-vs-christianity+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<atheism-vs-christianit y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/atheism-vs-christianity?hl=.
> This is an excellent example of finches turning into slightly
> different coloured finches. No new features, no new functions, no new
> anything - just a hybridisation between two pre-existing birds.
> Please explain how it represents an indication that the same finches
> could have arisen from - say - a small dinosaur (or any other
> ancestral creature, take your pick).
It's an example of evolution. And why it represents an example of
evolution is adequately explained in the article.
> since only a fool thinks God is creator as in the scriptures we see it
> is the hearsay of the pagans that did not know how to read or write
> and were not ever in contact with IAM or inside the Garden..so what
> fools in the mountains say about IAM is what you follow and like the
> dummy that cheats and copies off the worst student in class you too
> become the worst student in class.
> try to know how to read in life and not read and think as complete
> idiot that all the words are from God.
> On Nov 19, 12:29 pm, flying gorilla <ryan.kle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > That God will do anything for a laugh! Even though we KNOW that
> > evolution is false, he keeps giving us all this silly fake evidence to
> > trick us. This time, I almost fell for it...
> > On Nov 19, 9:05 am, Drafterman <drafter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is an excellent example of finches turning into slightly
> different coloured finches. No new features, no new functions, no new
> anything - just a hybridisation between two pre-existing birds.
How many kinds of finches would have been on Noah's ark?
> Please explain how it represents an indication that the same finches
> could have arisen from - say - a small dinosaur (or any other
> ancestral creature, take your pick).
> This is an excellent example of finches turning into slightly
> different coloured finches. No new features, no new functions, no new
> anything - just a hybridisation between two pre-existing birds.
> Please explain how it represents an indication that the same finches
> could have arisen from - say - a small dinosaur (or any other
> ancestral creature, take your pick).
On Nov 19, 8:08 pm, STB <Savingthefut...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> since only a fool thinks God is creator as in the scriptures we see it
> is the hearsay of the pagans that did not know how to read or write
> and were not ever in contact with IAM or inside the Garden..
<snip>
I'm curious: The identification of God as "I AM" is an idea that comes
from the scriptures, yes?
If it's stupid to trust the scriptures, why do you keep using the
scriptures' name for God?
|
