<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology</id>
  <title type="text">Epistemology Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  You are invited to join our group to discuss epistemology and give your view on questions such as: What is science, what is knowledge and what is logic? Are there absolute and universal rules? Is quantum theory superior? Is there just one universe? How does research influence its outcome?
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/epistemology/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="Epistemology feed"/>
  <updated>2008-11-21T07:35:57Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com.ng" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Sam Carana</name>
  <email>sam.car...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-21T07:35:57Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/d440426868fc2f66/973ff8d3deaaee12?show_docid=973ff8d3deaaee12</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/d440426868fc2f66/973ff8d3deaaee12?show_docid=973ff8d3deaaee12"/>
  <title type="text">Re: ARE YOU FREE?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I&#39;m a strong supporter of homeschooling and many other things, Hank, &lt;br&gt; but I don&#39;t see how you think you can &amp;quot;raise human intelligence&amp;quot; by &lt;br&gt; posting nonsense about global warming. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Cheers! &lt;br&gt; Sam Carana
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Sam Carana</name>
  <email>sam.car...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-21T07:31:28Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/6454bd7e130c4be5/0d053fd2d3d31063?show_docid=0d053fd2d3d31063</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/6454bd7e130c4be5/0d053fd2d3d31063?show_docid=0d053fd2d3d31063"/>
  <title type="text">Re: DON&#39;T WORRY ABOUT MYTHICAL GW. Earth recovering from mini ice age and volcanic eruptions.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  This again doesn&#39;t seem to make much sense, Hank. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;The differences in radiative forcing estimates between the present day &lt;br&gt; and the start of the industrial era for solar irradiance changes and &lt;br&gt; volcanoes are both very small compared to the differences in radiative &lt;br&gt; forcing estimated to have resulted from human activities. As a result,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Hank Kroll</name>
  <email>hankkr...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-20T20:00:27Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/6454bd7e130c4be5/b97c33b9a854726c?show_docid=b97c33b9a854726c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/6454bd7e130c4be5/b97c33b9a854726c?show_docid=b97c33b9a854726c"/>
  <title type="text">DON&#39;T WORRY ABOUT MYTHICAL GW. Earth recovering from mini ice age and volcanic eruptions.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  GW NUTS DON’T HAVE TO WORRY. JUST WAIT FOR THE NEXT VOLCANIC ERUPTION. &lt;br&gt; VOLCANOES SPEW MUCH MORE CO2 THAN HUMANS. &lt;br&gt; VOLCANOES HAVE THE BIGGEST AFFECT ON CLIMATE CHANGE. &lt;br&gt; The increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere &lt;br&gt; are not the only factors influencing climate. Explosive volcanic
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>adrian</name>
  <email>a...@kol.co.nz</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-20T06:18:55Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/dde394624efcc033/59f7b48a70811f79?show_docid=59f7b48a70811f79</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/dde394624efcc033/59f7b48a70811f79?show_docid=59f7b48a70811f79"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [epistemology 9797] Re: Grapes are sour, aren&#39;t they?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Sorry dood, I did not forget you are a backward Indian &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;a.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Sam Carana</name>
  <email>sam.car...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-20T06:46:24Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/ebc08cebe79e00fd/b398082e59fdd1f9?show_docid=b398082e59fdd1f9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/ebc08cebe79e00fd/b398082e59fdd1f9?show_docid=b398082e59fdd1f9"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [epistemology 9799] Dear Sam; This is the article on space-caused CO2 reduction with dust.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I have not read any reports that more dust was being dumped on Earth &lt;br&gt; over the past few decades, Hank. The kind of global warming we&#39;re &lt;br&gt; witnessing now can only be explained by pointing at the increase of &lt;br&gt; greenhouse gases in the atmosphere as the cause. I agree that &lt;br&gt; greenhouse gases are not the full story. Apart from greenhouse gases,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Sam Carana</name>
  <email>sam.car...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-20T06:32:57Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/3be2c240cc3042d0/27790337e66ff7b2?show_docid=27790337e66ff7b2</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/3be2c240cc3042d0/27790337e66ff7b2?show_docid=27790337e66ff7b2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [epistemology 9800] CO2 cooling of atmosphere.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Nothing new there, Hank. The radiative forcing of CO2 may seem only &lt;br&gt; small at first glance, but CO2 remains in the atmosphere for long &lt;br&gt; periods and the accumulation over the years adds up to significant &lt;br&gt; warming. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Cheers! &lt;br&gt; Sam Carana
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Hank Kroll</name>
  <email>hankkr...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-20T04:49:25Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/3be2c240cc3042d0/3372d8569dcda3a6?show_docid=3372d8569dcda3a6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/3be2c240cc3042d0/3372d8569dcda3a6?show_docid=3372d8569dcda3a6"/>
  <title type="text">CO2 cooling of atmosphere.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Cooling of Atmosphere Due to CO2 Emission &lt;br&gt; G. V. CHILINGAR,1 L. F. KHILYUK,1, and O. G. SOROKHTIN2 &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;1Rudolf W. Gunnerman Energy and Environment Laboratory, University of &lt;br&gt; Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA &lt;br&gt; 2Institute of Oceanology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, &lt;br&gt; Russia
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Hank Kroll</name>
  <email>hankkr...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-20T04:45:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/ebc08cebe79e00fd/755d26eedbd02731?show_docid=755d26eedbd02731</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/ebc08cebe79e00fd/755d26eedbd02731?show_docid=755d26eedbd02731"/>
  <title type="text">Dear Sam; This is the article on space-caused CO2 reduction with dust.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Try not to worry about the atmospheric trace gas CO2. &lt;br&gt; Remember those experiments written up in National Geographic where &lt;br&gt; they dumped iron filings into the ocean and later on the satellite &lt;br&gt; photographs showed a big green patch? &lt;br&gt; The more dust comes in from outer space the more the plankton grows, &lt;br&gt; and the more atmospheric CO2 is absorbed (and vice versa). Once again,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Henry Kroll</name>
  <email>hankkr...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-19T19:43:59Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/d440426868fc2f66/c38b4c2e7c196a28?show_docid=c38b4c2e7c196a28</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/d440426868fc2f66/c38b4c2e7c196a28?show_docid=c38b4c2e7c196a28"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [epistemology 9790] Re: ARE YOU FREE?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Twenty years ago I had to start thinking in QFT when writing Philosopher&#39;s &lt;br&gt; Stone. It took me five years to write the book and my head was spinning in &lt;br&gt; higher dimensions before I finished it. So far I have had about 1000 medical &lt;br&gt; doctors read it and it has been traded around to various university &lt;br&gt; library&#39;s for some time now.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Dasun</name>
  <email>epaniv...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-19T13:23:51Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/dde394624efcc033/f79b8fc282da3cee?show_docid=f79b8fc282da3cee</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/dde394624efcc033/f79b8fc282da3cee?show_docid=f79b8fc282da3cee"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [epistemology 9792] Re: Grapes are sour, aren&#39;t they?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Sorry dude i again forgot you are a christian! :)
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Sam Carana</name>
  <email>sam.car...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-20T00:41:37Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/067c683b7fe6310b/6ff35bfe6c1602b7?show_docid=6ff35bfe6c1602b7</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/067c683b7fe6310b/6ff35bfe6c1602b7?show_docid=6ff35bfe6c1602b7"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [epistemology 9795] Re: What is Epistemology?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I agree, Adrian, science all too often follows the old inquisition &lt;br&gt; method of seeking to destroy &#39;inconvenient&#39; views rather than to come &lt;br&gt; up with enabling ideas and work them out. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Cheers! &lt;br&gt; Sam Carana
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>adrian</name>
  <email>a...@kol.co.nz</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-20T00:36:06Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/067c683b7fe6310b/89c1d895e2eaa92a?show_docid=89c1d895e2eaa92a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/067c683b7fe6310b/89c1d895e2eaa92a?show_docid=89c1d895e2eaa92a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [epistemology 9794] Re: What is Epistemology?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Indeed Sam, he cannot. To put it in a nutshell G.M. does not know whereof he speaks. He ignores more &lt;br&gt; than just Q.M. Alan Aspects&#39;s 1982 telepathic particles follow more simply from waves and or &lt;br&gt; wavicles which follow more obviously from the fields they are embedded in. Actually particles are &lt;br&gt; now interpreted as knots or standing waves. Math is still used and uses particle soup which is a
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Sam Carana</name>
  <email>sam.car...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-19T23:30:43Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/067c683b7fe6310b/98864f6327519142?show_docid=98864f6327519142</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/067c683b7fe6310b/98864f6327519142?show_docid=98864f6327519142"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [epistemology 9781] What is Epistemology?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You say that the cutting edge of physics is currently the Unified &lt;br&gt; Theory, George. And I believe that we both distrust efforts to come up &lt;br&gt; with a single theory to explain all phenomena. The 10-dimensional &lt;br&gt; model is purely theoretical, and it&#39;s an extension of conventional &lt;br&gt; dimensions, which is probably why it&#39;s welcomed by conventional
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Georges Metanomski</name>
  <email>zg...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-19T18:27:18Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/067c683b7fe6310b/92a52566779e44aa?show_docid=92a52566779e44aa</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/067c683b7fe6310b/92a52566779e44aa?show_docid=92a52566779e44aa"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [epistemology 9781] Re: What is Epistemology?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Due to the general interest of the topic, I copy this &lt;br&gt; discussion with Sam to additional lists. &lt;br&gt; ============================= &lt;br&gt; G: &lt;br&gt; Epistemology sees one of the cornerstones of cognition &lt;br&gt; in the polarity of &amp;quot;subjective&amp;quot; continuity and &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;objective&amp;quot; discreteness. Physics, the fundamental &lt;br&gt; science, embodies the continuity in SPACE-Field and
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>adrian</name>
  <email>a...@kol.co.nz</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-19T10:33:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/dde394624efcc033/de0feba24626c243?show_docid=de0feba24626c243</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com.ng/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/dde394624efcc033/de0feba24626c243?show_docid=de0feba24626c243"/>
  <title type="text">Re: [epistemology 9791] Re: Grapes are sour, aren&#39;t they?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;quot;&amp;quot;Could&amp;quot;&amp;quot;, did not happen. There was a much earlier civilisation of which Genessis 11.1 says the &lt;br&gt; whole world was of one language. After an about 12,000 BCE global disaster civilisation spread back &lt;br&gt; from the North pole out in all directions. It could also rain tomorrow, or not. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;adrian.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
