Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
McCain Still Struggling With The Basics
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
palin.bi...@yahoo.com  
View profile  
 More options Sep 11 2008, 8:03 pm
Newsgroups: alt.atheism, alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.usa.republican, misc.consumers
From: palin.bi...@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:03:35 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Sep 11 2008 8:03 pm
Subject: McCain Still Struggling With The Basics
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/11/politics/animal/main4440080...

McCain Still Struggling With The Basics
Sep 11, 2008

(Political Animal) MCCAIN STILL STRUGGLING WITH THE BASICS.... There's
been ample discussion of late about Sarah Palin being sequestered,
away from the media, because the McCain campaign isn't confident in
her ability to answer questions about, well, much of anything. But
what about McCain's ability to answer questions?

AmericaBlog posted a clip of an interview McCain did, via satellite,
with Rob Caldwell at WCSH in Portland, Maine. Caldwell noted, for
example, that McCain insisted that national security and counter-
terrorism is the number one issue facing the United States. McCain
denied ever having said that. Caldwell moved on, asking about Sarah
Palin's experience in national security. McCain responded by attacking
Barack Obama.

"Well, you say you're sure she has the experience, but again, I'm just
asking for an example," Caldwell said. "What experience does she have
in the field of national security?" McCain responded:

"Energy. She knows more about energy than probably anyone else in the
United States of America. She's a governor of a state where 20% of
America's energy supply comes from there. And we all know that energy
is a critical and vital national security issue. We've got to stop
sending $700 billion of American money to countries that don't like us
very much. She's very well versed on that issue."And, uh, she also
happens to represent, be governor of a state that's right next to
Russia. She understands Russia."

I'm afraid this is just embarrassingly incoherent. First, the notion
that Palin's proximity to Russia counts as national security
experience continues to be unusually stupid, even for McCain.

Second, "Energy" is not a response to the question, "What experience
does she have in the field of national security?"

And third, to insist, publicly and on the record, that Sarah Palin
"knows more about energy than probably anyone else in the United
States of America" is, quite literally, laughable. We are, after all,
talking about a politician who isn't sure about the human impact on
global warming, and hasn't demonstrated any real expertise on the
issue. Ever.

As Yglesias recently noted, "Give Sarah Palin this much -- her
understanding of the geopolitics of energy is every bit as daft as
that of much more seasoned conservative pseudo-experts. She can spin
out outlandish and ultimately nonsensical scenarios about Iran (or
Venezuela) deploying the mythical 'oil weapon' and she, too, can
ignore the fundamentally global nature of hydrocarbon markets by
prattling about 'energy independence.'"

Stepping back, it's striking that McCain still, even now, can't answer
obvious questions about his own running mate. Caldwell's question was
direct, but hardly an unexpected curveball. Indeed, the obvious answer
for McCain is that Palin doesn't have a background in national
security, but neither do most governors who seek national office, but
he's confident in her judgment, her ability to learn quickly, etc.

But, no. Asked an obvious question, McCain offers a confused response
that doesn't make any sense.

Maybe the next time the Republican handlers prep Palin on how to
answer questions, McCain should sit in and take a few notes.

Video at <http://www.americablog.com/2008/09/mccain-finally-answers-
some-questions.html>


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jack  
View profile  
 More options Sep 11 2008, 8:18 pm
Newsgroups: alt.atheism, alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.usa.republican, misc.consumers
From: "Jack" <furgfurgf...@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:18:27 -0400
Local: Thurs, Sep 11 2008 8:18 pm
Subject: Re: McCain Still Struggling With The Basics
I really really don't care about this.

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
zzpat  
View profile  
 More options Sep 11 2008, 9:10 pm
Newsgroups: alt.atheism, alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.usa.republican, misc.consumers
From: zzpat <zzpatr...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:10:00 -0500
Subject: Re: McCain Still Struggling With The Basics

palin.bi...@yahoo.com wrote:
> http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/11/politics/animal/main4440080...

> McCain Still Struggling With The Basics
> Sep 11, 2008

> (Political Animal) MCCAIN STILL STRUGGLING WITH THE BASICS.... There's
> been ample discussion of late about Sarah Palin being sequestered,
> away from the media, because the McCain campaign isn't confident in
> her ability to answer questions about, well, much of anything. But
> what about McCain's ability to answer questions?

The GOP nominates idiots who can't answer even basic questions. Then
when the media attacks them for being idiots, they cry "liberal media."
Then the media backs down and the idiot is elected.

The failure of the media to call a pig, a pig resulted in the massive
accumulation of debt from tax cuts we could never afford.  Then the GOP
took us to war for no reason and the media spent years defending their
failures.

Even after the media dropped the ball and praised the complete idiocy of
  Bush and Reagan, the GOP whined about the liberal media.

In the end we need a media that knows only one thing...the truth...and
when the truth insults the GOP they need to be ignored.

--
Impeach Bush
http://zzpat.tripod.com/cvb/

Impeach Search Engine:
http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=012146513885108216046:rzesyut3kmm


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google