Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Giving Away Ideas
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
ShellyS  
View profile  
 More options Nov 1 2009, 8:17 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.composition
From: ShellyS <shell...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Nov 1 2009 8:17 am
Subject: Re: Giving Away Ideas
On Oct 27, 7:55 am, netcat <net...@devnull.eridani.eol.ee> wrote:

> In article <4ae6d98c.4206...@news.btconnect.com>,
> s...@sofluc.co.uk.invalid says...

> > As a data point: the library where I live (one main library, and several
> > local branches) decided to shelve all the books together.

> All the libraries in Estonia have always done that, except children's
> libraries, possibly. And no tagging, either.

> rgds,
> netcat

There are a couple in the US that have experimented with non-library
shelving. They've done away with the Dewey Decimal System and are
using the shelving scheme used in bookstores. Patrons seem to like it
and more libraries are looking into it.

Our library system shelves fantasy with fiction and gives SF its own
section. Some branches have broken with that and moved fantasy in with
SF, which was what I did in my previous branch. Sure, it's labeling,
but it's more a convenience for readers than any real categorization
of the books, IMO, because I believe there's a crossover of genres,
and more blending and blurring than ever. But I never understood why
fantasy and SF were separated, which I first noticed close to 30 years
ago when I joined the library system.

Libraries are getting more creative/innovative in shelving. Strict
cataloging may become obsolete.

--Shelly


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google