<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>rec.arts.sf.science Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science</link>
  <description>Real and speculative aspects of SF science.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>&#39;American&#39; John Cornyn&#39;s Letter on his Being Pro Rape - ZOMBIES DON&#39;T CARE: Is this America? A place where &#39;Men&#39; live? - FBI no evidence linking Laden to 911 - Bush and Cheney immediately closed 911 investigations</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/9bbf1a3c9bbc12be/e8a712909e30367e?show_docid=e8a712909e30367e</link>
  <description>
  The tyranny of censorship is what stops &lt;br&gt; our free words that speak for Justice &lt;br&gt; securing our dying freedoms. Send this &lt;br&gt; as your concern also why don&#39;t you &lt;br&gt; fight back to defend? &lt;br&gt; ArmyTimes &amp;quot;At least one in six service members is on some form of &lt;br&gt; psychiatric drug.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; Typical Nazi grunt behaviour. Why? There is
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/9bbf1a3c9bbc12be/e8a712909e30367e?show_docid=e8a712909e30367e</guid>
  <author>
  rpitpyouuertnrgutr...@hotmail.com
  (Bushite Nazi Grunts Deserve to Die)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:33:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Implications of the Langston Field...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/e2fe89ca6daf14db/81fb737fe8c10d0f?show_docid=81fb737fe8c10d0f</link>
  <description>
  The Navier-Stokes equations can be written explicitly in four lines, &lt;br&gt; or in vector notation in two lines, and solving these is definitely &lt;br&gt; NOT trivial.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/e2fe89ca6daf14db/81fb737fe8c10d0f?show_docid=81fb737fe8c10d0f</guid>
  <author>
  tkoe...@netcologne.de
  (Thomas Koenig)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:29:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Global warming...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/664482539a97605e/ef7122e6e63d084e?show_docid=ef7122e6e63d084e</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m not sure what you want us to help you with. It sounds like you &lt;br&gt; already have a setting by authorial fiat (&amp;quot;assume the sea rises 10 &lt;br&gt; meters over the next century&amp;quot;). And it sounds like you have a plot &lt;br&gt; that doesn&#39;t require too much detailed knowledge of said setting &lt;br&gt; (focusing on the human aspects of politics and romance, instead of the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/664482539a97605e/ef7122e6e63d084e?show_docid=ef7122e6e63d084e</guid>
  <author>
  valen...@gmail.com
  (Damien Valentine)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:17:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Perceptions of increments of time.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/7a1d83d3f7984a36/155877e4bd3e0189?show_docid=155877e4bd3e0189</link>
  <description>
  On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:13:41 -0700 (PDT), &amp;quot;n...@bid.nes&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; I don&#39;t need anything nearly so complex. &lt;br&gt; My Base8sz is different from the scenario which started this thread &lt;br&gt; (human with Base8 timekeeping). &lt;br&gt; For this, I&#39;m positing a race with a mental configuration different &lt;br&gt; from humans. They are poor at rote memorization but very good at
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/7a1d83d3f7984a36/155877e4bd3e0189?show_docid=155877e4bd3e0189</guid>
  <author>
  jym...@dialup4less.com
  (Jyme)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:37:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Fate of soda-lime glass</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/bc8e448fdd8c171c/b6b250855c72d4d6?show_docid=b6b250855c72d4d6</link>
  <description>
  On Mar 19, 10:06 am, Crown-Horned Snorkack &amp;lt;chornedsnork...@hush.ai&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; No it isn&#39;t, but it inspired the invention of iridescent glazes in the &lt;br&gt; art nouveau movement. &lt;br&gt; (I also have experience in digging up ancient iridescent glass, in my &lt;br&gt; case in Israel.) &lt;br&gt; There are quite a number of metals found in ancient glass, some added
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/bc8e448fdd8c171c/b6b250855c72d4d6?show_docid=b6b250855c72d4d6</guid>
  <author>
  carey...@gmail.com
  (careysub@gmail.com)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:57:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Nova and Saturn V...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/8a14a904653fd39f/f31117f9d6a35571?show_docid=f31117f9d6a35571</link>
  <description>
  In rec.arts.sf.science message &amp;lt;0e0b8121-0db4-4d9b-b0db-5357d c92e034@g26 &lt;br&gt; g2000yqn.googlegroups.com&amp;gt;, Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:06:56, Johnny1a &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;shermanl...@hotmail.com&amp;gt; posted: &lt;br&gt; Wikipedia knows about it : &amp;lt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova_(rocket&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;)&amp;gt;; &lt;br&gt; also &amp;lt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/nova.htm&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt;.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/8a14a904653fd39f/f31117f9d6a35571?show_docid=f31117f9d6a35571</guid>
  <author>
  reply1...@merlyn.demon.co.uk
  (Dr J R Stockton)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:19:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Perceptions of increments of time.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/7a1d83d3f7984a36/cb3c345d43f9e207?show_docid=cb3c345d43f9e207</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot;More than one possible logical structure&amp;quot; is a peculiar notion, since &lt;br&gt; either it&#39;s trivial (ie, you redfined the terms so that &amp;quot;octagon&amp;quot; has &lt;br&gt; six sides, or the geometric axioms are different, or some combination) &lt;br&gt; or the situation is self-contradictory (ie, not just contrary to common &lt;br&gt; expectations, but *self* contradictory). If it&#39;s just a vocabulary
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/7a1d83d3f7984a36/cb3c345d43f9e207?show_docid=cb3c345d43f9e207</guid>
  <author>
  thro...@sheol.org
  (Wayne Throop)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:06:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Perceptions of increments of time.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/7a1d83d3f7984a36/86d1a7a22517f094?show_docid=86d1a7a22517f094</link>
  <description>
  I agree, in conventional terms, but this is the Discworld we&#39;re &lt;br&gt; talking about. I vaguely recall (and my Google-Fu is weak today or I&#39;d &lt;br&gt; cite it) Pratchett including in a footnote an &amp;quot;explanation&amp;quot; involving &lt;br&gt; the way the Discverse was created and *signed*. &lt;br&gt; Sounds exactly like magic to me. ;&amp;gt;) &lt;br&gt; Mark L. Fergerson
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/7a1d83d3f7984a36/86d1a7a22517f094?show_docid=86d1a7a22517f094</guid>
  <author>
  alien8...@gmail.com
  (nuny@bid.nes)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:41:33 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Global warming...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/664482539a97605e/3ed69acc45559d58?show_docid=3ed69acc45559d58</link>
  <description>
  How might a futurist science-fiction writer handle global warming? &lt;br&gt; Let&#39;s imagine that the year is 2100 and the oceans have risen by 10 &lt;br&gt; meters. &lt;br&gt; In 2010 the models are weakly explaining the global warming; it is in &lt;br&gt; fact inexplicably warming up to fast. the arctic and antarctic are &lt;br&gt; melting and the rise in the ocean level are well under way. The models
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/664482539a97605e/3ed69acc45559d58?show_docid=3ed69acc45559d58</guid>
  <author>
  frecksem...@yahoo.com
  (Solidwind)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:12:48 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Fate of soda-lime glass</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/bc8e448fdd8c171c/2e92fdaf98740279?show_docid=2e92fdaf98740279</link>
  <description>
  In archaelogical time, bottles don&#39;t have contents. Plastic caps will &lt;br&gt; get brittle and fall apart, metal caps will oxidize and fall apart. &lt;br&gt; (Okay, somebody will now find an example of an Egyptian soda water &lt;br&gt; bottle which was discovered in drinkable condition and with the &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;5 obols for recycling&amp;quot; hieroglyphs still intact. But *in general*,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/bc8e448fdd8c171c/2e92fdaf98740279?show_docid=2e92fdaf98740279</guid>
  <author>
  erkyr...@eblong.com
  (Andrew Plotkin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:28:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Fate of soda-lime glass</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/bc8e448fdd8c171c/ededee4c5d862695?show_docid=ededee4c5d862695</link>
  <description>
  Which components of glass oxidize? Iron oxides? &lt;br&gt; Thus a bottle with aqueous contents would hydrate from inside, while &lt;br&gt; outer surface would stay intact - right?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/bc8e448fdd8c171c/ededee4c5d862695?show_docid=ededee4c5d862695</guid>
  <author>
  chornedsnork...@hush.ai
  (Crown-Horned Snorkack)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:06:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Fate of soda-lime glass</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/bc8e448fdd8c171c/cce269c417d267ae?show_docid=cce269c417d267ae</link>
  <description>
  Roman glass doesn&#39;t often (ever?) crystallize, but it does decompose in &lt;br&gt; moist environments. Modern glass is probably more stable chemically &lt;br&gt; since it has better quality control, although obviously long term &lt;br&gt; stability is not a criterion of bottle makers. &lt;br&gt; You might consider for comparison the Portland Vase, a 2000 year old
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/bc8e448fdd8c171c/cce269c417d267ae?show_docid=cce269c417d267ae</guid>
  <author>
  carey...@gmail.com
  (Carey)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:32:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Jettison the warp core!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/b757d16539b7cfbc/37f8e18e56b32916?show_docid=37f8e18e56b32916</link>
  <description>
  The series has had enough cases of ramming at impulse speeds &lt;br&gt; (portrayed as docking speeds), or controlled flight into terrain &lt;br&gt; landings, though.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/b757d16539b7cfbc/37f8e18e56b32916?show_docid=37f8e18e56b32916</guid>
  <author>
  go...@gossg.org
  (Greg Goss)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:32:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Jettison the warp core!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/b757d16539b7cfbc/8ace3e512b58ae7d?show_docid=8ace3e512b58ae7d</link>
  <description>
  (first my post trimmed) &lt;br&gt; Reusing that phrase was a really bad idea. I was thinking of collision &lt;br&gt; with some sort of rarified cloud that would present mostly a radiation &lt;br&gt; hazard, in which case the so-called crumple zone would be, hopefully, &lt;br&gt; absorbing the brunt of the radiation. I should have talked about the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/b757d16539b7cfbc/8ace3e512b58ae7d?show_docid=8ace3e512b58ae7d</guid>
  <author>
  andrew-mcdow...@o2.co.uk
  (mcdowella)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:14:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Nova and Saturn V...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/8a14a904653fd39f/f06ecc4ed6eab4bc?show_docid=f06ecc4ed6eab4bc</link>
  <description>
  Not that I have ever heard. &lt;br&gt; Von Braun in fact originally was a strong supporter of EOR, not direct &lt;br&gt; ascent, which meant smaller boosters in general. (He was a huge &lt;br&gt; proponent of on-orbit assembly.) &lt;br&gt; I suspect, like so much space &#39;history&#39; (especially the early years) &lt;br&gt; it&#39;s so much garbled urban myth. Many popular works have made a great
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.ng/group/rec.arts.sf.science/browse_thread/thread/8a14a904653fd39f/f06ecc4ed6eab4bc?show_docid=f06ecc4ed6eab4bc</guid>
  <author>
  fairwa...@gmail.com
  (Derek Lyons)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:46:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
