Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion I just don't get Lovecraft
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Michael Stemper  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6 2009, 6:34 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
From: mstem...@walkabout.empros.com (Michael Stemper)
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:34:51 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 6:34 pm
Subject: I just don't get Lovecraft
For a Halloween read, I pulled _The Lurker at the Threshold_ off the
shelves. Despite its being a relatively thin book, it took me a week
to get through it.

All kinds of things were hinted at or alluded to, throughout many
pages of diary excerpts, old newspaper clippings, conversations with
rustics, and so on. But, all that was ever described was "somebody
disappeared and his mangled body turned up months later." Since
these disappearances all happened a century or more before the main
narrative, they didn't really put a lot of terror into the story
for me.

Dewart goes into the tower that supposed to be left alone and removes
the stone that's not supposed to be moved. What happens? Nothing
much. His cousin, Baxter, comes to stay with him. What does Baxter
observe? Dewart's kind of bipolar.

Dewart pleads for help from some folks at Miskatonic U. They sit
around in their office talking, and the juior prof gets a reading
assignment.

<spoiler>

Finally, on the last two or three pages, Baxter gets killed, and
they kill the possessed Dewart and seal up the hole. They succeed
with relative ease.

Where's the suspense? Where's the terror? Did descriptions of frogs
croaking really do it in an earlier age?

I seem to recall liking "At the Mountains of Madness" in my
younger years, but now I hate to go back and reread it, for
fear that it was more of a "golden age" kind of enjoyment.

--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
The FAQ for rec.arts.sf.written is at:
http://www.geocities.com/evelynleeper/sf-written
Please read it before posting.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google