|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: alt.atheism, alt.anarchism, alt.messianic, alt.talk.creationism, rec.arts.sf.written
From: Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:49:57 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 5:49 am
Subject: Re: Genesis 1 & 2: Is There A Contradiction?
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:16:27 -0800 (PST), Suzanne <leila...@hotmail.com>
wrote in alt.talk.creationism: >On Oct 30, 8:11 am, Ralph <mmman...@yahoo.com> wrote: Baptists are many differing, though related, denominations amd, as far >> Suzanne wrote: >> > On Oct 27, 12:38 pm, "Taemon" <Tae...@zonnet.nl> wrote: >> >> Suzanne wrote: >> >>> The fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was not an >> >>> allegorical tree. It was a real tree, just like all the >> >>> trees in the Garden of Eden were real >> >>> trees. God would not teach with a lie. >> >>> If he says it is a tree, then it is a tree. >> >>> Adam was also a real person because he is listed in the genealogies as >> >>> being a real person. >> >> You have to admit that this is rather funny. Or it would be, if I believed >> >> the poster to be serious. Cute! >> >> T. >> > I am completely serious. >> :-)))))). Surely you jest. What a fruitcake. Tell us more about this fruit.- Hide quoted text - >I'm not lured by fruitcake. I think it's the citron that I don't like that is in it. as I can tell, only the ones who got their start defending American slavery claim that the Bible is literally true. The fact remains that the Bible is riddled with errors, no matter what >Suzanne
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||