For those who saw the recent forum between McCain and Obama, it was clear McCain won hands down. Needless to say this shocked and angered Obama's handlers and fans. So Andrea Mitchell of NBC (No Barack Criticism) reported that McCain was so well prepared for the questions that it was rumored that he was listening in and heard Obama's answers to the questions. That was, of course, pure bull shit. The host of the forum was very angry about the phony charge and confirmed that McCain was in a motorcade and then in a private room with no audio or video feed when Obama was answering the questions. This shows three things very clearly. First, Obama is at his best when doing his rock star act on stage with a teleprompter in front of his legion of fainting, chanting fans. But he doesn't do nearly as well when he has to sit down and just answer questions off the cuff and without a script. Second, it confirms just how much the mainstream media like NBC, MSNBC, Chris Matthews and the New York Times are in the tank for Obama. Third, it shows what poor losers Obama and his handlers are and that there really is no bottom to how low moveon.org, media matters and George Soros will go to smear John McCain.
> For those who saw the recent forum between McCain and Obama, it was clear > McCain won hands down. Needless to say this shocked and angered Obama's > handlers and fans. So Andrea Mitchell of NBC (No Barack Criticism) > reported that McCain was so well prepared for the questions that it was > rumored that he was listening in and heard Obama's answers to the > questions. That was, of course, pure bull shit. The host of the forum > was very angry about the phony charge and confirmed that McCain was in a > motorcade and then in a private room with no audio or video feed when > Obama was answering the questions. This shows three things very clearly. > First, Obama is at his best when doing his rock star act on stage with a > teleprompter in front of his legion of fainting, chanting fans. But he > doesn't do nearly as well when he has to sit down and just answer > questions off the cuff and without a script. Second, it confirms just how > much the mainstream media like NBC, MSNBC, Chris Matthews and the New York > Times are in the tank for Obama. Third, it shows what poor losers Obama > and his handlers are and that there really is no bottom to how low > moveon.org, media matters and George Soros will go to smear John McCain.
This post earns Mike the Coward a Larry "Wide Stance" Craig mouse pad!!!
> For those who saw the recent forum between McCain and Obama, it was clear > McCain won hands down. Needless to say this shocked and angered Obama's > handlers and fans. So Andrea Mitchell of NBC (No Barack Criticism) reported > that McCain was so well prepared for the questions that it was rumored that > he was listening in and heard Obama's answers to the questions. That was, > of course, pure bull shit. The host of the forum was very angry about the > phony charge and confirmed that McCain was in a motorcade and then in a > private room with no audio or video feed when Obama was answering the > questions. This shows three things very clearly. First, Obama is at his > best when doing his rock star act on stage with a teleprompter in front of > his legion of fainting, chanting fans. But he doesn't do nearly as well > when he has to sit down and just answer questions off the cuff and without a > script. Second, it confirms just how much the mainstream media like NBC, > MSNBC, Chris Matthews and the New York Times are in the tank for Obama. > Third, it shows what poor losers Obama and his handlers are and that there > really is no bottom to how low moveon.org, media matters and George Soros > will go to smear John McCain.
> Irish Mike
But...he wasnt in the cone of silence. You said so youself. So why the angry rant?
> For those who saw the recent forum between McCain and Obama, it was clear > McCain won hands down. Needless to say this shocked and angered Obama's > handlers and fans. So Andrea Mitchell of NBC (No Barack Criticism) > reported > that McCain was so well prepared for the questions that it was rumored > that > he was listening in and heard Obama's answers to the questions. That was, > of course, pure bull shit. The host of the forum was very angry about the > phony charge and confirmed that McCain was in a motorcade and then in a > private room with no audio or video feed when Obama was answering the > questions. This shows three things very clearly. First, Obama is at his > best when doing his rock star act on stage with a teleprompter in front of > his legion of fainting, chanting fans. But he doesn't do nearly as well > when he has to sit down and just answer questions off the cuff and without > a > script. Second, it confirms just how much the mainstream media like NBC, > MSNBC, Chris Matthews and the New York Times are in the tank for Obama. > Third, it shows what poor losers Obama and his handlers are and that there > really is no bottom to how low moveon.org, media matters and George Soros > will go to smear John McCain.
> Irish Mike
But...he wasnt in the cone of silence. You said so youself. So why the angry rant?
It's not a rant. I merely pointed out the latest sleaze-ball smear tactic used by the Obama camp and the main stream media that are in the tank for him. BTW, latest poll of likely voters shows McCain ahead of Obama by 5 points. Maybe voters are finally figuring out that raising taxes to fund more welfare, give-away and entitlement programs, while blocking efforts to drill for American oil and surrendering in the war on terror aren't good things after all.
I believe I can change hope to change we can believe in to hope we can change.
> > For those who saw the recent forum between McCain and Obama, it was clear > > McCain won hands down. Needless to say this shocked and angered Obama's > > handlers and fans. So Andrea Mitchell of NBC (No Barack Criticism) > > reported > > that McCain was so well prepared for the questions that it was rumored > > that > > he was listening in and heard Obama's answers to the questions. That was, > > of course, pure bull shit. The host of the forum was very angry about the > > phony charge and confirmed that McCain was in a motorcade and then in a > > private room with no audio or video feed when Obama was answering the > > questions. This shows three things very clearly. First, Obama is at his > > best when doing his rock star act on stage with a teleprompter in front of > > his legion of fainting, chanting fans. But he doesn't do nearly as well > > when he has to sit down and just answer questions off the cuff and without > > a > > script. Second, it confirms just how much the mainstream media like NBC, > > MSNBC, Chris Matthews and the New York Times are in the tank for Obama. > > Third, it shows what poor losers Obama and his handlers are and that there > > really is no bottom to how low moveon.org, media matters and George Soros > > will go to smear John McCain.
> > Irish Mike
> But...he wasnt in the cone of silence. You said so youself. So why > the angry rant?
> It's not a rant. I merely pointed out the latest sleaze-ball smear tactic > used by the Obama camp and the main stream media that are in the tank for > him. BTW, latest poll of likely voters shows McCain ahead of Obama by 5 > points. Maybe voters are finally figuring out that raising taxes to fund > more welfare, give-away and entitlement programs, while blocking efforts to > drill for American oil and surrendering in the war on terror aren't good > things after all.
> I believe I can change hope to change we can believe in to hope we can > change.
> Irish Mike- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
Wait...so he wasnt in the cone of silence. You KNOW he wasnt in the cone of silence. But you're mad at Obama's campaign for pointing out that he violated the terms of the debate?
> > > For those who saw the recent forum between McCain and Obama, it was clear > > > McCain won hands down. Needless to say this shocked and angered Obama's > > > handlers and fans. So Andrea Mitchell of NBC (No Barack Criticism) > > > reported > > > that McCain was so well prepared for the questions that it was rumored > > > that > > > he was listening in and heard Obama's answers to the questions. That was, > > > of course, pure bull shit. The host of the forum was very angry about the > > > phony charge and confirmed that McCain was in a motorcade and then in a > > > private room with no audio or video feed when Obama was answering the > > > questions. This shows three things very clearly. First, Obama is at his > > > best when doing his rock star act on stage with a teleprompter in front of > > > his legion of fainting, chanting fans. But he doesn't do nearly as well > > > when he has to sit down and just answer questions off the cuff and without > > > a > > > script. Second, it confirms just how much the mainstream media like NBC, > > > MSNBC, Chris Matthews and the New York Times are in the tank for Obama. > > > Third, it shows what poor losers Obama and his handlers are and that there > > > really is no bottom to how low moveon.org, media matters and George Soros > > > will go to smear John McCain.
> > > Irish Mike
> > But...he wasnt in the cone of silence. You said so youself. So why > > the angry rant?
> > It's not a rant. I merely pointed out the latest sleaze-ball smear tactic > > used by the Obama camp and the main stream media that are in the tank for > > him. BTW, latest poll of likely voters shows McCain ahead of Obama by 5 > > points. Maybe voters are finally figuring out that raising taxes to fund > > more welfare, give-away and entitlement programs, while blocking efforts to > > drill for American oil and surrendering in the war on terror aren't good > > things after all.
> > I believe I can change hope to change we can believe in to hope we can > > change.
> > Irish Mike- Hide quoted text -
> > - Show quoted text -
> Wait...so he wasnt in the cone of silence. You KNOW he wasnt in the > cone of silence. But you're mad at Obama's campaign for pointing out > that he violated the terms of the debate?
Indeed. Apparently cheating is okay if you're a wrinkly old white dude.
Am I the only one wishing Mikey would experience the "cone of silence" in a much more personal sense?
____________________________________________________________________ * kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
>> > > For those who saw the recent forum between McCain and Obama, it was >> > > clear >> > > McCain won hands down. Needless to say this shocked and angered >> > > Obama's >> > > handlers and fans. So Andrea Mitchell of NBC (No Barack Criticism) >> > > reported >> > > that McCain was so well prepared for the questions that it was >> > > rumored >> > > that >> > > he was listening in and heard Obama's answers to the questions. That >> > > was, >> > > of course, pure bull shit. The host of the forum was very angry about >> > > the >> > > phony charge and confirmed that McCain was in a motorcade and then in >> > > a >> > > private room with no audio or video feed when Obama was answering the >> > > questions. This shows three things very clearly. First, Obama is at >> > > his >> > > best when doing his rock star act on stage with a teleprompter in >> > > front > of >> > > his legion of fainting, chanting fans. But he doesn't do nearly as >> > > well >> > > when he has to sit down and just answer questions off the cuff and > without >> > > a >> > > script. Second, it confirms just how much the mainstream media like >> > > NBC, >> > > MSNBC, Chris Matthews and the New York Times are in the tank for >> > > Obama. >> > > Third, it shows what poor losers Obama and his handlers are and that > there >> > > really is no bottom to how low moveon.org, media matters and George >> > > Soros >> > > will go to smear John McCain.
>> > > Irish Mike
>> > But...he wasnt in the cone of silence. You said so youself. So why >> > the angry rant?
>> > It's not a rant. I merely pointed out the latest sleaze-ball smear >> > tactic >> > used by the Obama camp and the main stream media that are in the tank >> > for >> > him. BTW, latest poll of likely voters shows McCain ahead of Obama by >> > 5 >> > points. Maybe voters are finally figuring out that raising taxes to >> > fund >> > more welfare, give-away and entitlement programs, while blocking >> > efforts to >> > drill for American oil and surrendering in the war on terror aren't >> > good >> > things after all.
>> > I believe I can change hope to change we can believe in to hope we can >> > change.
>> > Irish Mike- Hide quoted text -
>> > - Show quoted text -
>> Wait...so he wasnt in the cone of silence. You KNOW he wasnt in the >> cone of silence. But you're mad at Obama's campaign for pointing out >> that he violated the terms of the debate?
> Indeed. Apparently cheating is okay if you're a wrinkly old white dude.
> Am I the only one wishing Mikey would experience the "cone of silence" in > a much more personal sense?
Somebody is all excited that McCain was able to memorize a few lines and get past an Orange County Evangelical Inquisition. That and jumping up and down about Georgia gets him an August bump. Let's see the numbers in three weeks.
ChrisRobin, my dear, dear friend, there was this time, oh, 8/20/2008 11:53 AM, or thereabouts, when you let the following craziness loose on Usenet:
>>> - Show quoted text - >> Wait...so he wasnt in the cone of silence. You KNOW he wasnt in the >> cone of silence. But you're mad at Obama's campaign for pointing out >> that he violated the terms of the debate?
> Indeed. Apparently cheating is okay if you're a wrinkly old white dude.
> > Am I the only one wishing Mikey would experience the "cone of silence" in > > a much more personal sense?
> I'll trade you one Mikey for one orangie.
They are similar Susan. However, no one takes Orangie too seriously (imo). People actually *seem* to take Mike seriously. When he contradicts himself so many times, constantly posts old chain emails that are proven false time and time again, I'm just dumbfounded that people take him seriously about anything. Then, he posts poker advice (which is a mix of good and bad) and people seem to eat it up. How can he possibly adapt to changing table condidtions when he has shown a complete and utter inability to change his opinion when presented with evidence to the contrary?
