-Bob Stoops is interested in Notre Dame.....This one I think is true...I could see Stoops leaving OU where he no longer has to put up with the Red River Showdown and it gets him a bit closer to home...plus he'll be on College Football's biggest stage.
-Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
-Kyle Shanahan could be the next head coach of Colorado....possible...but CU still has to buy out Teh Hawk and I'm not sure CU is willing to do that....I think if this does happen you will see immediate recruiting success, but is he as good of a coach as his old man?
On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit weaker this year.
On Nov 16, 11:36 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:
> On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
> Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit > weaker this year.
You're right...maybe he really is interested in Louisville? Can you imagine his offense in the Big East?
On Nov 16, 1:06 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Nov 16, 11:36 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:> On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one > > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
> > Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name > > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit > > weaker this year.
> You're right...maybe he really is interested in Louisville? Can you > imagine his offense in the Big East?
mike leach has never gotten his team to a bcs bowl. Never.
He's not a great candidate for jobs because he's not a great coach.
> On Nov 16, 1:06 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 16, 11:36 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:> On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one > > > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
> > > Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name > > > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit > > > weaker this year.
> > You're right...maybe he really is interested in Louisville? Can you > > imagine his offense in the Big East?
> mike leach has never gotten his team to a bcs bowl. Never.
> He's not a great candidate for jobs because he's not a great coach.
Ummm...so you're telling me that Louisville would have ZERO interest in Mike Leach?
> On Nov 16, 12:10 pm, mianderson <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 16, 1:06 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 16, 11:36 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:> On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one > > > > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
> > > > Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name > > > > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit > > > > weaker this year.
> > > You're right...maybe he really is interested in Louisville? Can you > > > imagine his offense in the Big East?
> > mike leach has never gotten his team to a bcs bowl. Never.
> > He's not a great candidate for jobs because he's not a great coach.
> Ummm...so you're telling me that Louisville would have ZERO interest > in Mike Leach?
depends on who the other available candidates were.....
Washington(while I admit is a much better job than louisville) gave leach and interview and passed.....
Leach is ok, but he's not one of the top 20 or so head guys in college football....
> On Nov 16, 1:20 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 16, 12:10 pm, mianderson <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 16, 1:06 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > On Nov 16, 11:36 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:> On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one > > > > > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
> > > > > Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name > > > > > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit > > > > > weaker this year.
> > > > You're right...maybe he really is interested in Louisville? Can you > > > > imagine his offense in the Big East?
> > > mike leach has never gotten his team to a bcs bowl. Never.
> > > He's not a great candidate for jobs because he's not a great coach.
> > Ummm...so you're telling me that Louisville would have ZERO interest > > in Mike Leach?
> depends on who the other available candidates were.....
> Washington(while I admit is a much better job than louisville) gave > leach and interview and passed.....
> Leach is ok, but he's not one of the top 20 or so head guys in college > football....
Yet Louisville would trade in Goob's left nut to have him as head coach.
On Nov 16, 12:36 pm, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:
> On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
> Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit > weaker this year.
Didn't he leave the Washington AD thinking he was completely insane and they'd never trust him with their program? That was the rumor I heard, that he is batshit crazy in person and it has cost him a couple chances to move up.
> -Bob Stoops is interested in Notre Dame.....This one I think is > true...I could see Stoops leaving OU where he no longer has to put up > with the Red River Showdown and it gets him a bit closer to > home...plus he'll be on College Football's biggest stage.
> -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
Is Gerald Myers still the AD at Tech? If so... then no. Leach wants out.
> On Nov 16, 12:36 pm, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:
> > On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one > > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
> > Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name > > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit > > weaker this year.
> Didn't he leave the Washington AD thinking he was completely insane > and they'd never trust him with their program? That was the rumor I > heard, that he is batshit crazy in person and it has cost him a couple > chances to move up.
I think his batshit crazy persona is part of his schtick.
<mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Nov 16, 1:20 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Nov 16, 12:10 pm, mianderson <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Nov 16, 1:06 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> > > On Nov 16, 11:36 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote: >> > > > On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > > > > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one >> > > > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
>> > > > Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name >> > > > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit >> > > > weaker this year.
>> > > You're right...maybe he really is interested in Louisville? Can you >> > > imagine his offense in the Big East?
>> > mike leach has never gotten his team to a bcs bowl. Never.
>> > He's not a great candidate for jobs because he's not a great coach.
>> Ummm...so you're telling me that Louisville would have ZERO interest >> in Mike Leach? >depends on who the other available candidates were.....
>Washington(while I admit is a much better job than louisville) gave >leach and interview and passed.....
>Leach is ok, but he's not one of the top 20 or so head guys in college >football....
I was unaware that Louisville was one of the top 20 or so *jobs* in College Football...
Who did I manage to slight here? -- "Balance the cost of the soul you lost With the dreams you lightly sold Are you under the power of gold?" Dan Fogelberg
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:26:15 -0800 (PST), mianderson
> <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Nov 16, 1:20 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Nov 16, 12:10 pm, mianderson <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Nov 16, 1:06 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > > On Nov 16, 11:36 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote: > >> > > > On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one > >> > > > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
> >> > > > Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name > >> > > > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit > >> > > > weaker this year.
> >> > > You're right...maybe he really is interested in Louisville? Can you > >> > > imagine his offense in the Big East?
> >> > mike leach has never gotten his team to a bcs bowl. Never.
> >> > He's not a great candidate for jobs because he's not a great coach.
> >> Ummm...so you're telling me that Louisville would have ZERO interest > >> in Mike Leach? > >depends on who the other available candidates were.....
> >Washington(while I admit is a much better job than louisville) gave > >leach and interview and passed.....
> >Leach is ok, but he's not one of the top 20 or so head guys in college > >football....
> I was unaware that Louisville was one of the top 20 or so *jobs* in > College Football...
It might be one of the top 20 available 'jobs at the end of the season......
> Who did I manage to slight here? > -- > "Balance the cost of the soul you lost > With the dreams you lightly sold > Are you under the power of gold?" > Dan Fogelberg- Hide quoted text -
<deemsb...@aol.com> wrote: >On Nov 18, 4:53 pm, "David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@mindspring.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:26:15 -0800 (PST), mianderson >> <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Nov 16, 1:20 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> On Nov 16, 12:10 pm, mianderson <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Nov 16, 1:06 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> > > On Nov 16, 11:36 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote: >> >> > > > On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one >> >> > > > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
>> >> > > > Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name >> >> > > > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit >> >> > > > weaker this year.
>> >> > > You're right...maybe he really is interested in Louisville? Can you >> >> > > imagine his offense in the Big East?
>> >> > mike leach has never gotten his team to a bcs bowl. Never.
>> >> > He's not a great candidate for jobs because he's not a great coach.
>> >> Ummm...so you're telling me that Louisville would have ZERO interest >> >> in Mike Leach? >> >depends on who the other available candidates were.....
>> >Washington(while I admit is a much better job than louisville) gave >> >leach and interview and passed.....
>> >Leach is ok, but he's not one of the top 20 or so head guys in college >> >football....
>> I was unaware that Louisville was one of the top 20 or so *jobs* in >> College Football...
> It might be one of the top 20 available 'jobs at the end of the >season......
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:05:19 -0800 (PST), "deemsb...@aol.com"
> <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote: > >On Nov 18, 4:53 pm, "David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@mindspring.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:26:15 -0800 (PST), mianderson > >> <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >On Nov 16, 1:20 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 16, 12:10 pm, mianderson <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > On Nov 16, 1:06 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> > > On Nov 16, 11:36 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote: > >> >> > > > On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > > > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one > >> >> > > > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
> >> >> > > > Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name > >> >> > > > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit > >> >> > > > weaker this year.
> >> >> > > You're right...maybe he really is interested in Louisville? Can you > >> >> > > imagine his offense in the Big East?
> >> >> > mike leach has never gotten his team to a bcs bowl. Never.
> >> >> > He's not a great candidate for jobs because he's not a great coach.
> >> >> Ummm...so you're telling me that Louisville would have ZERO interest > >> >> in Mike Leach? > >> >depends on who the other available candidates were.....
> >> >Washington(while I admit is a much better job than louisville) gave > >> >leach and interview and passed.....
> >> >Leach is ok, but he's not one of the top 20 or so head guys in college > >> >football....
> >> I was unaware that Louisville was one of the top 20 or so *jobs* in > >> College Football...
> > It might be one of the top 20 available 'jobs at the end of the > >season......
> Is it any better than Texas Tech?
It's just gotta be in the top 20 openings.....Louisville, Virginia, Notre Dame, Florida, Meatchicken, Stanford.......
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:26:15 -0800 (PST), mianderson
> <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Nov 16, 1:20 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Nov 16, 12:10 pm, mianderson <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Nov 16, 1:06 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > > On Nov 16, 11:36 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote: > >> > > > On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one > >> > > > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
> >> > > > Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name > >> > > > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit > >> > > > weaker this year.
> >> > > You're right...maybe he really is interested in Louisville? Can you > >> > > imagine his offense in the Big East?
> >> > mike leach has never gotten his team to a bcs bowl. Never.
> >> > He's not a great candidate for jobs because he's not a great coach.
> >> Ummm...so you're telling me that Louisville would have ZERO interest > >> in Mike Leach? > >depends on who the other available candidates were.....
> >Washington(while I admit is a much better job than louisville) gave > >leach and interview and passed.....
> >Leach is ok, but he's not one of the top 20 or so head guys in college > >football....
> I was unaware that Louisville was one of the top 20 or so *jobs* in > College Football...
> On Nov 18, 3:53 pm, "David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:26:15 -0800 (PST), mianderson
> > <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Nov 16, 1:20 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> On Nov 16, 12:10 pm, mianderson <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > On Nov 16, 1:06 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> > > On Nov 16, 11:36 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote: > > >> > > > On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one > > >> > > > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
> > >> > > > Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name > > >> > > > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit > > >> > > > weaker this year.
> > >> > > You're right...maybe he really is interested in Louisville? Can you > > >> > > imagine his offense in the Big East?
> > >> > mike leach has never gotten his team to a bcs bowl. Never.
> > >> > He's not a great candidate for jobs because he's not a great coach.
> > >> Ummm...so you're telling me that Louisville would have ZERO interest > > >> in Mike Leach? > > >depends on who the other available candidates were.....
> > >Washington(while I admit is a much better job than louisville) gave > > >leach and interview and passed.....
> > >Leach is ok, but he's not one of the top 20 or so head guys in college > > >football....
> > I was unaware that Louisville was one of the top 20 or so *jobs* in > > College Football...
You're an aTm fan, right? You can't possibly believe that aTm is a Top *20* job, can you? -- "Doctor, Doctor, help me please, I know you'll understand There's a time device inside of me, I'm a self-destructin' man." Raymond Douglas Davies
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:26:15 -0800 (PST), mianderson
> <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Nov 16, 1:20 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Nov 16, 12:10 pm, mianderson <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Nov 16, 1:06 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > > On Nov 16, 11:36 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote: > >> > > > On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one > >> > > > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
> >> > > > Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name > >> > > > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit > >> > > > weaker this year.
> >> > > You're right...maybe he really is interested in Louisville? Can you > >> > > imagine his offense in the Big East?
> >> > mike leach has never gotten his team to a bcs bowl. Never.
> >> > He's not a great candidate for jobs because he's not a great coach.
> >> Ummm...so you're telling me that Louisville would have ZERO interest > >> in Mike Leach? > >depends on who the other available candidates were.....
> >Washington(while I admit is a much better job than louisville) gave > >leach and interview and passed.....
> >Leach is ok, but he's not one of the top 20 or so head guys in college > >football....
> I was unaware that Louisville was one of the top 20 or so *jobs* in > College Football...
> What *are* the Top 20 Coaching Jobs in CF?
> Florida? > Virginia Tech? > Miami?
Big pause to come up with some upstart programs that might be as good as the above johnny come latelies.
<jens...@charter.net> wrote: >On Nov 18, 3:53 pm, "David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@mindspring.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:26:15 -0800 (PST), mianderson >> <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >On Nov 16, 1:20 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> On Nov 16, 12:10 pm, mianderson <mianderso...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Nov 16, 1:06 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> > > On Nov 16, 11:36 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote: >> >> > > > On Nov 16, 11:28 am, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> > > > > -Mike Leach is interested in Louisville....hmmm...I think this is one >> >> > > > > of those "better pay me more money if you want me to stay" deals.
>> >> > > > Didn't he sign an extension last year when some other school's name >> >> > > > came up? I would think that his negotiating position would be a bit >> >> > > > weaker this year.
>> >> > > You're right...maybe he really is interested in Louisville? Can you >> >> > > imagine his offense in the Big East?
>> >> > mike leach has never gotten his team to a bcs bowl. Never.
>> >> > He's not a great candidate for jobs because he's not a great coach.
>> >> Ummm...so you're telling me that Louisville would have ZERO interest >> >> in Mike Leach? >> >depends on who the other available candidates were.....
>> >Washington(while I admit is a much better job than louisville) gave >> >leach and interview and passed.....
>> >Leach is ok, but he's not one of the top 20 or so head guys in college >> >football....
>> I was unaware that Louisville was one of the top 20 or so *jobs* in >> College Football...
>> Michigan? >> Penn State? >Did you just put Michigan and Penn State behind Miami and Virginia >Tech???
>Seriously???
Meetchicken has fallen off the map.
Do YOU want to follow Joe Pa? This is also why Florida State isn't in the Top Televen either.
IN ANY CASE, I'm *asking*. Alright?
How do YOU rank the jobs? -- "I want to know what became of the changes We waited for love to bring. Were they only the fitful dreams Of some greater awakening?" Clyde J. Browne
|
