On Nov 7, 7:46 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 9:16 am, Alexander-The-Gr...@webtv.net (Alexander_
> The_Great) wrote: > > beat Florida, Texas or Bama if they were given a shot at the big game? > > Um.. no.
> I've never really thought it was likely and still don't. Which is > pretty well irrelevant to the discussion of who deserves to be in the > big game.
The "big game" is now determined by money and TV ratings -- not by on- field quality.
On Nov 7, 10:50 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 7:46 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 9:16 am, Alexander-The-Gr...@webtv.net (Alexander_
> > The_Great) wrote: > > > beat Florida, Texas or Bama if they were given a shot at the big game? > > > Um.. no.
> > I've never really thought it was likely and still don't. Which is > > pretty well irrelevant to the discussion of who deserves to be in the > > big game.
> The "big game" is now determined by money and TV ratings -- not by on- > field quality.
> On Nov 7, 10:50 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 7:46 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:
> > > On Nov 7, 9:16 am, Alexander-The-Gr...@webtv.net (Alexander_
> > > The_Great) wrote: > > > > beat Florida, Texas or Bama if they were given a shot at the big game? > > > > Um.. no.
> > > I've never really thought it was likely and still don't. Which is > > > pretty well irrelevant to the discussion of who deserves to be in the > > > big game.
> > The "big game" is now determined by money and TV ratings -- not by on- > > field quality.
> "now"?
We've discussed this before, that only a few BCS titles were legit, based on the selection process: 1999 FSU, 2002 tOSU, 2005 Texas.
See archives. I don't have time to re-explain it all.
> On Nov 7, 7:52 am, "deemsb...@aol.com" <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 10:50 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com> > > wrote:
> > > On Nov 7, 7:46 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:
> > > > On Nov 7, 9:16 am, Alexander-The-Gr...@webtv.net (Alexander_
> > > > The_Great) wrote: > > > > > beat Florida, Texas or Bama if they were given a shot at the big game? > > > > > Um.. no.
> > > > I've never really thought it was likely and still don't. Which is > > > > pretty well irrelevant to the discussion of who deserves to be in the > > > > big game.
> > > The "big game" is now determined by money and TV ratings -- not by on- > > > field quality.
> > "now"?
> We've discussed this before, that only a few BCS titles were legit, > based on the selection process: 1999 FSU, 2002 tOSU, 2005 Texas.
> See archives. I don't have time to re-explain it all.-
> On Nov 7, 11:02 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 7:52 am, "deemsb...@aol.com" <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 7, 10:50 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com> > > > wrote:
> > > > On Nov 7, 7:46 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:
> > > > > On Nov 7, 9:16 am, Alexander-The-Gr...@webtv.net (Alexander_
> > > > > The_Great) wrote: > > > > > > beat Florida, Texas or Bama if they were given a shot at the big game? > > > > > > Um.. no.
> > > > > I've never really thought it was likely and still don't. Which is > > > > > pretty well irrelevant to the discussion of who deserves to be in the > > > > > big game.
> > > > The "big game" is now determined by money and TV ratings -- not by on- > > > > field quality.
> > > "now"?
> > We've discussed this before, that only a few BCS titles were legit, > > based on the selection process: 1999 FSU, 2002 tOSU, 2005 Texas.
> > See archives. I don't have time to re-explain it all.-
> What I meant was it's always been that way.
Yea, the BCS really didn't change much at all -- it just codified the monetary advantage.
> On Nov 7, 10:08 am, "deemsb...@aol.com" <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 11:02 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com> > > wrote:
> > > On Nov 7, 7:52 am, "deemsb...@aol.com" <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > > On Nov 7, 10:50 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > On Nov 7, 7:46 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:
> > > > > > On Nov 7, 9:16 am, Alexander-The-Gr...@webtv.net (Alexander_
> > > > > > The_Great) wrote: > > > > > > > beat Florida, Texas or Bama if they were given a shot at the big game? > > > > > > > Um.. no.
> > > > > > I've never really thought it was likely and still don't. Which is > > > > > > pretty well irrelevant to the discussion of who deserves to be in the > > > > > > big game.
> > > > > The "big game" is now determined by money and TV ratings -- not by on- > > > > > field quality.
> > > > "now"?
> > > We've discussed this before, that only a few BCS titles were legit, > > > based on the selection process: 1999 FSU, 2002 tOSU, 2005 Texas.
> > > See archives. I don't have time to re-explain it all.-
> > What I meant was it's always been that way.
> Yea, the BCS really didn't change much at all -- it just codified the > monetary advantage.
> On Nov 7, 7:52 am, "deemsb...@aol.com" <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 10:50 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com> > > wrote:
> > > On Nov 7, 7:46 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:
> > > > On Nov 7, 9:16 am, Alexander-The-Gr...@webtv.net (Alexander_
> > > > The_Great) wrote: > > > > > beat Florida, Texas or Bama if they were given a shot at the big game? > > > > > Um.. no.
> > > > I've never really thought it was likely and still don't. Which is > > > > pretty well irrelevant to the discussion of who deserves to be in the > > > > big game.
> > > The "big game" is now determined by money and TV ratings -- not by on- > > > field quality.
> > "now"?
> We've discussed this before, that only a few BCS titles were legit, > based on the selection process: 1999 FSU, 2002 tOSU, 2005 Texas.
> See archives. I don't have time to re-explain it all.
<the_andrew_sm...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Nov 7, 11:02 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 7:52 am, "deemsb...@aol.com" <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 7, 10:50 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com> > > > wrote:
> > > > On Nov 7, 7:46 am, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:
> > > > > On Nov 7, 9:16 am, Alexander-The-Gr...@webtv.net (Alexander_
> > > > > The_Great) wrote: > > > > > > beat Florida, Texas or Bama if they were given a shot at the big game? > > > > > > Um.. no.
> > > > > I've never really thought it was likely and still don't. Which is > > > > > pretty well irrelevant to the discussion of who deserves to be in the > > > > > big game.
> > > > The "big game" is now determined by money and TV ratings -- not by on- > > > > field quality.
> > > "now"?
> > We've discussed this before, that only a few BCS titles were legit, > > based on the selection process: 1999 FSU, 2002 tOSU, 2005 Texas.
> > See archives. I don't have time to re-explain it all.
|
