> Chris Bellomy wrote: >> MoParMaN wrote, On 11/6/09 5:23 PM: >>> Chris Bellomy wrote: >>>> MoParMaN wrote, On 11/5/09 9:58 PM: >>>>> <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:3c9a85d2-6c3e-4da6-8970-7a8b01b6ef9a@d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >>>>> On Nov 5, 10:48 pm, "MoParMaN" >>>>> <scott.hendryx.clot...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>>> <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> Does the military fry, stick, hang, or shoot? >>>>>> They won't try it, the FBI will in Federal Court. He'll get what >>>>>> McVey got >>>>>> if convicted.
>>>>> Active duty on a military base with military victims? (Seriously, >>>>> why wouldn't the military try it?)
>>>>> They won't, I took a class on this in 1974, I can't exactly quote >>>>> you why, but he'll be tried in Federal Court. >>>> Because federal law supersedes military law in all cases, >>>> I believe.
>>>> cb
>>> It can, but since he's military after all, he'll be tried and hung >>> more than likely.
>> Federal law obviously permits that. See Timothy McVeigh.
>> cb
> As I remember, he was injected...I could be wrong though.
DanS. wrote: > MoParMaN, I've never been so impressed by your ability put all the > words together as I was on 11/6/2009 in saying: >> Chris Bellomy wrote: >>> MoParMaN wrote, On 11/6/09 5:23 PM: >>>> Chris Bellomy wrote: >>>>> MoParMaN wrote, On 11/5/09 9:58 PM: >>>>>> <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:3c9a85d2-6c3e-4da6-8970-7a8b01b6ef9a@d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >>>>>> On Nov 5, 10:48 pm, "MoParMaN" >>>>>> <scott.hendryx.clot...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>>>> <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> Does the military fry, stick, hang, or shoot? >>>>>>> They won't try it, the FBI will in Federal Court. He'll get what >>>>>>> McVey got >>>>>>> if convicted.
>>>>>> Active duty on a military base with military victims? >>>>>> (Seriously, why wouldn't the military try it?)
>>>>>> They won't, I took a class on this in 1974, I can't exactly quote >>>>>> you why, but he'll be tried in Federal Court. >>>>> Because federal law supersedes military law in all cases, >>>>> I believe.
>>>>> cb
>>>> It can, but since he's military after all, he'll be tried and hung >>>> more than likely.
>>> Federal law obviously permits that. See Timothy McVeigh.
>>> cb
>> As I remember, he was injected...I could be wrong though.
> I also believe he was no longer active duty.
No, he was tried in Federal Court, not the military.
> DanS. wrote: >> MoParMaN, I've never been so impressed by your ability put all the >> words together as I was on 11/6/2009 in saying: >>> Chris Bellomy wrote: >>>> MoParMaN wrote, On 11/6/09 5:23 PM: >>>>> Chris Bellomy wrote: >>>>>> MoParMaN wrote, On 11/5/09 9:58 PM: >>>>>>> <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:3c9a85d2-6c3e-4da6-8970-7a8b01b6ef9a@d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >>>>>>> On Nov 5, 10:48 pm, "MoParMaN" >>>>>>> <scott.hendryx.clot...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> Does the military fry, stick, hang, or shoot? >>>>>>>> They won't try it, the FBI will in Federal Court. He'll get what >>>>>>>> McVey got >>>>>>>> if convicted.
>>>>>>> Active duty on a military base with military victims? >>>>>>> (Seriously, why wouldn't the military try it?)
>>>>>>> They won't, I took a class on this in 1974, I can't exactly quote >>>>>>> you why, but he'll be tried in Federal Court. >>>>>> Because federal law supersedes military law in all cases, >>>>>> I believe.
>>>>>> cb
>>>>> It can, but since he's military after all, he'll be tried and hung >>>>> more than likely.
>>>> Federal law obviously permits that. See Timothy McVeigh.
>>>> cb
>>> As I remember, he was injected...I could be wrong though.
>> I also believe he was no longer active duty.
> No, he was tried in Federal Court, not the military.
Yeah, but wasn't he /out/ of the military when he did the act?
DanS. wrote: > MoParMaN, I've never been so impressed by your ability put all the > words together as I was on 11/6/2009 in saying: >> DanS. wrote: >>> MoParMaN, I've never been so impressed by your ability put all the >>> words together as I was on 11/6/2009 in saying: >>>> Chris Bellomy wrote: >>>>> MoParMaN wrote, On 11/6/09 5:23 PM: >>>>>> Chris Bellomy wrote: >>>>>>> MoParMaN wrote, On 11/5/09 9:58 PM: >>>>>>>> <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:3c9a85d2-6c3e-4da6-8970-7a8b01b6ef9a@d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >>>>>>>> On Nov 5, 10:48 pm, "MoParMaN" >>>>>>>> <scott.hendryx.clot...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> Does the military fry, stick, hang, or shoot? >>>>>>>>> They won't try it, the FBI will in Federal Court. He'll get >>>>>>>>> what McVey got >>>>>>>>> if convicted.
>>>>>>>> Active duty on a military base with military victims? >>>>>>>> (Seriously, why wouldn't the military try it?)
>>>>>>>> They won't, I took a class on this in 1974, I can't exactly >>>>>>>> quote you why, but he'll be tried in Federal Court. >>>>>>> Because federal law supersedes military law in all cases, >>>>>>> I believe.
>>>>>>> cb
>>>>>> It can, but since he's military after all, he'll be tried and >>>>>> hung more than likely.
>>>>> Federal law obviously permits that. See Timothy McVeigh.
>>>>> cb
>>>> As I remember, he was injected...I could be wrong though.
>>> I also believe he was no longer active duty.
>> No, he was tried in Federal Court, not the military.
> Yeah, but wasn't he /out/ of the military when he did the act?
Yes, what are you saying? I think your confused or you've confused me.
hey, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net>'s been through solid matter, for crying out loud. Who knows what's happened to his brain? Maybe it's scrambled his molecules...
>In article <a6v7f5plqe34pft42qrd46gccn014os...@4ax.com>, > Dennis J <drjud...@verizon.netSCRAPE.COM> wrote:
>> hey, "MoParMaN" <scott.hendryx.clot...@sbcglobal.net>'s been through >> solid matter, for crying out loud. Who knows what's happened to his >> brain? Maybe it's scrambled his molecules...
>> >> > Does the military fry, stick, hang, or shoot?
>> >> They won't try it, the FBI will in Federal Court. He'll get what McVey >> >> got >> >> if convicted.
>> > Active duty on a military base with military victims? (Seriously, >> >why wouldn't the military try it?)
>> >They won't, I took a class on this in 1974, I can't exactly quote you why, >> >but he'll be tried in Federal Court. If he is Courts Martial, I think >> >they still hang or shoot. Hugh prolly knows more about it than me.
>> cases in the UCMJ can be appealed up to and including the Supreme >> Court. From MY memories of the UCMJ, Federal courts are not tilted as >> heavily towards the Prosecution. If he goes with Military courts, I >> think he could be Hung or Shot.
>Hanged.
I'm sure a few people in Ft. Hood would enjoy building the gallows. --
"the Democrat and Republican parties are destroying our country right now, They're destroying our political process." -- Jesse Ventura
"Education is the progressive discovery of our own Ignorance" Will Durant
"One can't have a sense of perspective without a sense of Humor" -- Wayne Thiboux
"the Glass is not only half full, it has been delicious so far!!" -- ME
|
