Dan Bretta wrote: > On Nov 3, 4:04 pm, Jaybyrd <jaybyrdb...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Nov 3, 4:59 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Nov 3, 3:44 pm, Anthony Summers <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> >>> wrote:> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:43:58 -0800 (PST), Jaybyrd wrote... >>>>> The problem with this theory is that long of a time of being a >>>>> real sock is pathological in itself. It would just get boring.
>>>> I can attest to that fact. For a while, I considered staying >>>> incognito long enough to actually attend a WVU game, link up with >>>> Schrumpf there, and then unsock when I posted the pictures. I >>>> decided in the end that it just wasn't worth the effort.
>>> That would have rooled. But obviously some don't mind staying >>> incognito forever -- ie Hoover and Snorky who I don't believe are >>> socks, but for whatever reason they've decided to stay anonymous >>> indefinitely...Hoover as far as I know is some dood living in >>> Virginia >>> whose initials are CB. Snorky I have no clue, but I think he lives >>> in >>> Florida and is David H. I've never had the inclination to put a sock >>> on.
>> David H is the ultimate sock. I received a christmas card from him >> one year.
> I've gotten a Christmas card and two postcards over a 2-3 year period > about 7 or 8 years ago. Analyzing the handwriting I'm perty sure that > there were at least two David H's.
> On Nov 3, 4:19 pm, "David V. Loewe, Jr" <davelo...@charter.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:14:36 -0800 (PST), Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> > > wrote:
> > >On Nov 3, 2:59 pm, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> On Nov 3, 2:56 pm, Eric Ramon <ramon.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > On Nov 3, 11:42 am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> > > On Nov 3, 2:39 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > 1) He'll be voting straight GOP within 2 years.
> > >> > > > 2) He'll be addicted to prescription meds within 5 years.
> > >> > > Maybe #2. I don't think he has enough sense for #1. > > >> > you can call it "sense". I call it "greed" or "me first".
> > >> Really? Strangely enough there is a pretty large population of people > > >> below middle class that vote Republican who financially would be far > > >> better off under Democratic plans. I think you confuse "freedom" for > > >> "me first".
> > >Democrats are totally against freedom from what I understand.
> > They are pretty consistently against economic freedom.
> I think we should just let the Wall Streeters continue to fuck over > the main streeters with their economic freedoms.
> Dan- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
You have Clinton, Dodd, Frank, et. al., to thank for that. They're the ones that put a litigational gun to the heads of bankers forcing them to make loans to idiots and professional flippers. All Republicans were doing was following the money.
> On Nov 3, 4:39 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 3, 4:19 pm, "David V. Loewe, Jr" <davelo...@charter.net> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:14:36 -0800 (PST), Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> > > > wrote:
> > > >On Nov 3, 2:59 pm, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >> On Nov 3, 2:56 pm, Eric Ramon <ramon.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > On Nov 3, 11:42 am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >> > > On Nov 3, 2:39 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > 1) He'll be voting straight GOP within 2 years.
> > > >> > > > 2) He'll be addicted to prescription meds within 5 years.
> > > >> > > Maybe #2. I don't think he has enough sense for #1. > > > >> > you can call it "sense". I call it "greed" or "me first".
> > > >> Really? Strangely enough there is a pretty large population of people > > > >> below middle class that vote Republican who financially would be far > > > >> better off under Democratic plans. I think you confuse "freedom" for > > > >> "me first".
> > > >Democrats are totally against freedom from what I understand.
> > > They are pretty consistently against economic freedom.
> > I think we should just let the Wall Streeters continue to fuck over > > the main streeters with their economic freedoms.
> > Dan- Hide quoted text -
> > - Show quoted text -
> You have Clinton, Dodd, Frank, et. al., to thank for that. They're > the ones that put a litigational gun to the heads of bankers forcing > them to make loans to idiots and professional flippers. All > Republicans were doing was using their newfound economic freedoms to fuck >over main streeters.
> On Nov 3, 2:56 pm, Eric Ramon <ramon.e...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 3, 11:42 am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 3, 2:39 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > 1) He'll be voting straight GOP within 2 years.
> > > > 2) He'll be addicted to prescription meds within 5 years.
> > > Maybe #2. I don't think he has enough sense for #1.
> > > Brent
> > you can call it "sense". I call it "greed" or "me first".
> Really? Strangely enough there is a pretty large population of people > below middle class that vote Republican who financially would be far > better off under Democratic plans. I think you confuse "freedom" for > "me first".
> Brent
They are called Christians. The Republicans are not dumn.
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:14:36 -0800 (PST), Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> > wrote:
> >On Nov 3, 2:59 pm, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Nov 3, 2:56 pm, Eric Ramon <ramon.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Nov 3, 11:42 am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > > On Nov 3, 2:39 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > > > 1) He'll be voting straight GOP within 2 years.
> >> > > > 2) He'll be addicted to prescription meds within 5 years.
> >> > > Maybe #2. I don't think he has enough sense for #1. > >> > you can call it "sense". I call it "greed" or "me first".
> >> Really? Strangely enough there is a pretty large population of people > >> below middle class that vote Republican who financially would be far > >> better off under Democratic plans. I think you confuse "freedom" for > >> "me first".
> >Democrats are totally against freedom from what I understand.
> They are pretty consistently against economic freedom.
Kind of like how the rule of law is against "baddest stick wielding mother fucker owns everything" freedom.
In article <4i0Im.4610$Yy6.1...@newsfe02.iad>, Ted Dawson
<nob...@home.anytime> wrote: > > 1) He'll be voting straight GOP within 2 years.
> > 2) He'll be addicted to prescription meds within 5 years.
> > Dan
> I have changed my mind about him; I don't believe he actually exists. I > believe he is really Hendryx or Rogers or Bellomy or some other regular who > has been playing with us.
> Nobody can be as stupid as he appears to be, and still walk upright. I just > don't believe it.
> On Nov 3, 2:56 pm, Eric Ramon <ramon.e...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 3, 11:42 am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 3, 2:39 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > 1) He'll be voting straight GOP within 2 years.
> > > > 2) He'll be addicted to prescription meds within 5 years.
> > > Maybe #2. I don't think he has enough sense for #1.
> > > Brent
> > you can call it "sense". I call it "greed" or "me first".
> Really? Strangely enough there is a pretty large population of people > below middle class that vote Republican who financially would be far > better off under Democratic plans. I think you confuse "freedom" for > "me first".
> On Nov 3, 4:19 pm, "David V. Loewe, Jr" <davelo...@charter.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:14:36 -0800 (PST), Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> > > wrote:
> > >On Nov 3, 2:59 pm, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> On Nov 3, 2:56 pm, Eric Ramon <ramon.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > On Nov 3, 11:42 am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> > > On Nov 3, 2:39 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > 1) He'll be voting straight GOP within 2 years.
> > >> > > > 2) He'll be addicted to prescription meds within 5 years.
> > >> > > Maybe #2. I don't think he has enough sense for #1. > > >> > you can call it "sense". I call it "greed" or "me first".
> > >> Really? Strangely enough there is a pretty large population of people > > >> below middle class that vote Republican who financially would be far > > >> better off under Democratic plans. I think you confuse "freedom" for > > >> "me first".
> > >Democrats are totally against freedom from what I understand.
> > They are pretty consistently against economic freedom.
> I think we should just let the Wall Streeters continue to fuck over > the main streeters with their economic freedoms.
I'm pretty sure we've got a Dem house, a Dem Senate and a Dem POTUS, and yet nothing has changed on wall street after a freakin year of the mess.
> On Nov 3, 4:39 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 3, 4:19 pm, "David V. Loewe, Jr" <davelo...@charter.net> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:14:36 -0800 (PST), Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> > > > wrote:
> > > >On Nov 3, 2:59 pm, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >> On Nov 3, 2:56 pm, Eric Ramon <ramon.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > On Nov 3, 11:42 am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >> > > On Nov 3, 2:39 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > 1) He'll be voting straight GOP within 2 years.
> > > >> > > > 2) He'll be addicted to prescription meds within 5 years.
> > > >> > > Maybe #2. I don't think he has enough sense for #1. > > > >> > you can call it "sense". I call it "greed" or "me first".
> > > >> Really? Strangely enough there is a pretty large population of people > > > >> below middle class that vote Republican who financially would be far > > > >> better off under Democratic plans. I think you confuse "freedom" for > > > >> "me first".
> > > >Democrats are totally against freedom from what I understand.
> > > They are pretty consistently against economic freedom.
> > I think we should just let the Wall Streeters continue to fuck over > > the main streeters with their economic freedoms.
> I'm pretty sure we've got a Dem house, a Dem Senate and a Dem POTUS, > and yet nothing has changed on wall street after a freakin year of the > mess.
Jim Brown wrote: > On Nov 3, 1:56 pm, Eric Ramon <ramon.e...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Nov 3, 11:42 am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Nov 3, 2:39 pm, Dan Bretta <nuda...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> 1) He'll be voting straight GOP within 2 years. >>>> 2) He'll be addicted to prescription meds within 5 years. >>> Maybe #2. I don't think he has enough sense for #1. >>> Brent >> you can call it "sense". I call it "greed" or "me first".
> Those greedy bastards, wanting to keep more of their own money and > such.
Too much of that "own money" was a result of cartel building, other forms of monopolization and pseudo-monopolization, widespread insider violations, and a million other dirty tricks - all while the feds looked the other way. You have to strike a balance - some amount of regulation *is* necessary.
I know that's anathema to many conservatives (not necessarily you), but it's demonstrably true.
In article <4i0Im.4610$Yy6.1...@newsfe02.iad>, "Ted Dawson" <nob...@home.anytime> wrote:
> > 1) He'll be voting straight GOP within 2 years.
> > 2) He'll be addicted to prescription meds within 5 years.
> > Dan
> I have changed my mind about him; I don't believe he actually exists. I > believe he is really Hendryx or Rogers or Bellomy or some other regular who > has been playing with us.
> Nobody can be as stupid as he appears to be, and still walk upright. I just > don't believe it.
You underestimate how much work it is to write the way mianderson writes. Try it.
Invent your own narcissistic puppet. That is very hard work.
|
