On Nov 6, 11:30 am, unclejr <wats...@kenyon.edu> wrote:
> Which team is the team of the decade? A valid argument can be made > for Texas, Florida, LSU, and USC.
> -Junior
If a valid argument could be made for any of those four teams, then I would say that proves that there would be no THE team of the decade. Does there have to be one?
However, after Florida wins it all this year, they will, without a doubt, be called The Team of the Decade. Barf.
In case you haven't figured it out yet, the Florida Tebows are not going to lose any games this year. Barf again.
On Nov 6, 11:36 am, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote:
> unclejr wrote, On 11/6/09 11:30 AM:
> > Which team is the team of the decade? A valid argument can be made > > for Texas, Florida, LSU, and USC.
> There isn't one.
> Plus, I think there's approximately a zero percent chance of > that happening.
IDWTP. There is certainly a higher than zero percent chance of this happening. I think that Texas plays the Florida/Alabama winner in the MNCG. Assuming, of course, that Bammer gets by LSU this weekend.
On Nov 6, 11:49 am, i_like_sock...@mailandnews.com wrote:
> On Nov 6, 11:30 am, unclejr <wats...@kenyon.edu> wrote:
> > Which team is the team of the decade? A valid argument can be made > > for Texas, Florida, LSU, and USC.
> If a valid argument could be made for any of those four teams, then I > would say that proves that there would be no THE team of the decade. > Does there have to be one?
No. Parity among the elite football schools seemed to DOMINATE.
> However, after Florida wins it all this year, they will, without a > doubt, be called The Team of the Decade. Barf.
Yup.
> In case you haven't figured it out yet, the Florida Tebows are not > going to lose any games this year. Barf again.
i_like_sock...@mailandnews.com wrote: > On Nov 6, 11:30 am, unclejr <wats...@kenyon.edu> wrote: >> Which team is the team of the decade? A valid argument can be made >> for Texas, Florida, LSU, and USC.
>> -Junior
> If a valid argument could be made for any of those four teams, then I > would say that proves that there would be no THE team of the decade. > Does there have to be one?
> However, after Florida wins it all this year, they will, without a > doubt, be called The Team of the Decade. Barf.
Three BCS trophies does not a "Team of the Decade" make.
Although I think there would be a decent argument for the "Team of the Last Half Decade."
On Nov 6, 12:16 pm, "Frisbee®" <discgolf...@gEEmail.com> wrote:
> i_like_sock...@mailandnews.com wrote: > > On Nov 6, 11:30 am, unclejr <wats...@kenyon.edu> wrote: > >> Which team is the team of the decade? A valid argument can be made > >> for Texas, Florida, LSU, and USC.
> > If a valid argument could be made for any of those four teams, then I > > would say that proves that there would be no THE team of the decade. > > Does there have to be one?
> > However, after Florida wins it all this year, they will, without a > > doubt, be called The Team of the Decade. Barf.
> Three BCS trophies does not a "Team of the Decade" make.
> Although I think there would be a decent argument for the "Team of the Last Half Decade."
unclejr wrote: > On Nov 6, 12:16 pm, "Frisbee®" <discgolf...@gEEmail.com> wrote: >> i_like_sock...@mailandnews.com wrote: >>> On Nov 6, 11:30 am, unclejr <wats...@kenyon.edu> wrote: >>>> Which team is the team of the decade? A valid argument can be made >>>> for Texas, Florida, LSU, and USC.
>>> If a valid argument could be made for any of those four teams, then >>> I would say that proves that there would be no THE team of the >>> decade. Does there have to be one?
>>> However, after Florida wins it all this year, they will, without a >>> doubt, be called The Team of the Decade. Barf.
>> Three BCS trophies does not a "Team of the Decade" make.
>> Although I think there would be a decent argument for the "Team of >> the Last Half Decade."
> Anti-weauxf noted.
> -Junior
Dude... The Gators had the Zooker from 2002-2004. This would automatically disqualify ANY team from Team of the Decade.
> unclejr wrote: > > On Nov 6, 12:16 pm, "Frisbee®" <discgolf...@gEEmail.com> wrote: > >> i_like_sock...@mailandnews.com wrote: > >>> On Nov 6, 11:30 am, unclejr <wats...@kenyon.edu> wrote: > >>>> Which team is the team of the decade? A valid argument can be made > >>>> for Texas, Florida, LSU, and USC.
> >>> If a valid argument could be made for any of those four teams, then > >>> I would say that proves that there would be no THE team of the > >>> decade. Does there have to be one?
> >>> However, after Florida wins it all this year, they will, without a > >>> doubt, be called The Team of the Decade. Barf.
> >> Three BCS trophies does not a "Team of the Decade" make.
> >> Although I think there would be a decent argument for the "Team of > >> the Last Half Decade."
> > Anti-weauxf noted.
> Dude... The Gators had the Zooker from 2002-2004. This would automatically > disqualify ANY team from Team of the Decade.
> i_like_sock...@mailandnews.com wrote: > > On Nov 6, 11:30 am, unclejr <wats...@kenyon.edu> wrote: > >> Which team is the team of the decade? A valid argument can be made > >> for Texas, Florida, LSU, and USC.
> >> -Junior
> > If a valid argument could be made for any of those four teams, then I > > would say that proves that there would be no THE team of the decade. > > Does there have to be one?
> > However, after Florida wins it all this year, they will, without a > > doubt, be called The Team of the Decade. Barf.
> Three BCS trophies does not a "Team of the Decade" make.
> Although I think there would be a decent argument for the "Team of the Last Half Decade."
I said they will be *called* the team of the decade after they complete their undefeated season. They will be called that.
> > On Nov 6, 11:36 am, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: > >> unclejr wrote, On 11/6/09 11:30 AM:
> >>> Which team is the team of the decade? A valid argument can be made > >>> for Texas, Florida, LSU, and USC. > >> There isn't one.
> >> Plus, I think there's approximately a zero percent chance of > >> that happening.
> > IDWTP. There is certainly a higher than zero percent chance of this > > happening. I think that Texas plays the Florida/Alabama winner in the > > MNCG.
> That's why there's approximately a zero percent chance of > that happening.
> cb
That burnt orange makin' you see red? C'mon, dude. They've got a puncher's chance.
> On Nov 6, 3:12 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: >> unclejr wrote, On 11/6/09 11:59 AM:
>>> On Nov 6, 11:36 am, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: >>>> unclejr wrote, On 11/6/09 11:30 AM: >>>>> Which team is the team of the decade? A valid argument can be made >>>>> for Texas, Florida, LSU, and USC. >>>> There isn't one. >>>> Plus, I think there's approximately a zero percent chance of >>>> that happening. >>> IDWTP. There is certainly a higher than zero percent chance of this >>> happening. I think that Texas plays the Florida/Alabama winner in the >>> MNCG. >> That's why there's approximately a zero percent chance of >> that happening.
> That burnt orange makin' you see red? C'mon, dude. They've got a > puncher's chance.
It's not actually that hard to beat the bovines.
1. Double cover Jordan Shipley.
2. Hit McCoy hard and often, to the echo of the whistle as Mickey Andrews used to say. He's fairly easily rattled, and if his crutch Shipley isn't an option, he'll give you the ball.
3. Take care of the ball when McCoy gives it to you.
That's about it. Neither Bama nor Florida would have any trouble with this.
> > On Nov 6, 3:12 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: > >> unclejr wrote, On 11/6/09 11:59 AM:
> >>> On Nov 6, 11:36 am, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: > >>>> unclejr wrote, On 11/6/09 11:30 AM: > >>>>> Which team is the team of the decade? A valid argument can be made > >>>>> for Texas, Florida, LSU, and USC. > >>>> There isn't one. > >>>> Plus, I think there's approximately a zero percent chance of > >>>> that happening. > >>> IDWTP. There is certainly a higher than zero percent chance of this > >>> happening. I think that Texas plays the Florida/Alabama winner in the > >>> MNCG. > >> That's why there's approximately a zero percent chance of > >> that happening.
> > That burnt orange makin' you see red? C'mon, dude. They've got a > > puncher's chance.
> It's not actually that hard to beat the bovines.
> 1. Double cover Jordan Shipley.
> 2. Hit McCoy hard and often, to the echo of the whistle as > Mickey Andrews used to say. He's fairly easily rattled, and > if his crutch Shipley isn't an option, he'll give you the ball.
> 3. Take care of the ball when McCoy gives it to you.
> That's about it. Neither Bama nor Florida would have any > trouble with this.
> cb
They've been playing solid football lately. McCoy's pretty physical, and I haven't seen anyone shut down Shipley. Texas' D is very good. Whoever plays the Horns will have their hands full.
> On Nov 6, 7:36 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: >> shiite wrote, On 11/6/09 6:30 PM:
>>> On Nov 6, 3:12 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: >>>> unclejr wrote, On 11/6/09 11:59 AM: >>>>> On Nov 6, 11:36 am, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: >>>>>> unclejr wrote, On 11/6/09 11:30 AM: >>>>>>> Which team is the team of the decade? A valid argument can be made >>>>>>> for Texas, Florida, LSU, and USC. >>>>>> There isn't one. >>>>>> Plus, I think there's approximately a zero percent chance of >>>>>> that happening. >>>>> IDWTP. There is certainly a higher than zero percent chance of this >>>>> happening. I think that Texas plays the Florida/Alabama winner in the >>>>> MNCG. >>>> That's why there's approximately a zero percent chance of >>>> that happening. >>> That burnt orange makin' you see red? C'mon, dude. They've got a >>> puncher's chance. >> It's not actually that hard to beat the bovines.
>> 1. Double cover Jordan Shipley.
>> 2. Hit McCoy hard and often, to the echo of the whistle as >> Mickey Andrews used to say. He's fairly easily rattled, and >> if his crutch Shipley isn't an option, he'll give you the ball.
>> 3. Take care of the ball when McCoy gives it to you.
>> That's about it. Neither Bama nor Florida would have any >> trouble with this.
> > On Nov 6, 7:36 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: > >> shiite wrote, On 11/6/09 6:30 PM:
> >>> On Nov 6, 3:12 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: > >>>> unclejr wrote, On 11/6/09 11:59 AM: > >>>>> On Nov 6, 11:36 am, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: > >>>>>> unclejr wrote, On 11/6/09 11:30 AM: > >>>>>>> Which team is the team of the decade? A valid argument can be made > >>>>>>> for Texas, Florida, LSU, and USC. > >>>>>> There isn't one. > >>>>>> Plus, I think there's approximately a zero percent chance of > >>>>>> that happening. > >>>>> IDWTP. There is certainly a higher than zero percent chance of this > >>>>> happening. I think that Texas plays the Florida/Alabama winner in the > >>>>> MNCG. > >>>> That's why there's approximately a zero percent chance of > >>>> that happening. > >>> That burnt orange makin' you see red? C'mon, dude. They've got a > >>> puncher's chance. > >> It's not actually that hard to beat the bovines.
> >> 1. Double cover Jordan Shipley.
> >> 2. Hit McCoy hard and often, to the echo of the whistle as > >> Mickey Andrews used to say. He's fairly easily rattled, and > >> if his crutch Shipley isn't an option, he'll give you the ball.
> >> 3. Take care of the ball when McCoy gives it to you.
> >> That's about it. Neither Bama nor Florida would have any > >> trouble with this.
> On Nov 6, 7:57 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: >> shiite wrote, On 11/6/09 6:48 PM:
>>> On Nov 6, 7:36 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: >>>> shiite wrote, On 11/6/09 6:30 PM: >>>>> On Nov 6, 3:12 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: >>>>>> unclejr wrote, On 11/6/09 11:59 AM: >>>>>>> On Nov 6, 11:36 am, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote: >>>>>>>> unclejr wrote, On 11/6/09 11:30 AM: >>>>>>>>> Which team is the team of the decade? A valid argument can be made >>>>>>>>> for Texas, Florida, LSU, and USC. >>>>>>>> There isn't one. >>>>>>>> Plus, I think there's approximately a zero percent chance of >>>>>>>> that happening. >>>>>>> IDWTP. There is certainly a higher than zero percent chance of this >>>>>>> happening. I think that Texas plays the Florida/Alabama winner in the >>>>>>> MNCG. >>>>>> That's why there's approximately a zero percent chance of >>>>>> that happening. >>>>> That burnt orange makin' you see red? C'mon, dude. They've got a >>>>> puncher's chance. >>>> It's not actually that hard to beat the bovines. >>>> 1. Double cover Jordan Shipley. >>>> 2. Hit McCoy hard and often, to the echo of the whistle as >>>> Mickey Andrews used to say. He's fairly easily rattled, and >>>> if his crutch Shipley isn't an option, he'll give you the ball. >>>> 3. Take care of the ball when McCoy gives it to you. >>>> That's about it. Neither Bama nor Florida would have any >>>> trouble with this. >>> They've been playing solid football lately. >> Every good team has hot streaks.
On Nov 6, 7:04 pm, stephenJ <sjar...@pop.com> wrote:
> Bot for USC. 1 national title wouldn't cut it in that discussion.
You, sir, are a dumnass. The AP national championship is the only true one for 2003. The AP had the Trojans #1 before the stupid MNCG and they had them #1 afterward.
> surprisingly, bellomy is right. a texas win would make a 3-way tie > between UF, LSU, and UT.
unclejr wrote: > On Nov 6, 7:04 pm, stephenJ <sjar...@pop.com> wrote: >> Bot for USC. 1 national title wouldn't cut it in that discussion.
> You, sir, are a dumnass. The AP national championship is the only > true one for 2003. The AP had the Trojans #1 before the stupid MNCG > and they had them #1 afterward.
>> surprisingly, bellomy is right. a texas win would make a 3-way tie >> between UF, LSU, and UT.
> unclejr wrote: >> On Nov 6, 7:04 pm, stephenJ <sjar...@pop.com> wrote: >>> Bot for USC. 1 national title wouldn't cut it in that discussion.
>> You, sir, are a dumnass. The AP national championship is the only >> true one for 2003. The AP had the Trojans #1 before the stupid MNCG >> and they had them #1 afterward.
>>> surprisingly, bellomy is right. a texas win would make a 3-way tie >>> between UF, LSU, and UT.
Chris Bellomy wrote: > stephenJ wrote, On 11/7/09 12:13 AM: >> unclejr wrote: >>> On Nov 6, 7:04 pm, stephenJ <sjar...@pop.com> wrote: >>>> Bot for USC. 1 national title wouldn't cut it in that discussion.
>>> You, sir, are a dumnass. The AP national championship is the only >>> true one for 2003. The AP had the Trojans #1 before the stupid MNCG >>> and they had them #1 afterward.
>>>> surprisingly, bellomy is right. a texas win would make a 3-way tie >>>> between UF, LSU, and UT.
>> no, just 1 for USC. and there aren't any MNC's anymore. Just BCS titles.
> Just as mythical.
Well maybe to you, but not to the BCS member institutions.
-- I wanted to see the powerful, mystical Elvis that had crash-landed from a burning star onto American soil .. that's the Elvis that inspired us to all the possibilities of life. But that Elvis had left the building.
|
