Google Beta User wrote: > On Aug 20, 10:25 am, stephenj <s...@cox.com> wrote: >> thanks for nothing, NBC. Bolt breaks Michael Johnson's epochal record >> from 1996.
>> 1)Bolt 19.30 (world record)
>> 2) Martina
>> 3) Spearmon (USA)
> It wasn't on TV?
> How is it possible none of these tracks are on TV? That is rather > staggering.
NBC wants to "save" it for its prime-time coverage.
It's ridiculous.
-- Why the industrial revolution was delayed until around 1800 is the great and enduring puzzle of human history.
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:44:17 -0700 (PDT), Tonawanda Kardex wrote... > On Aug 20, 10:40 am, E .F. Hokie <efho...@nah.nope> wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:25:56 -0500, stephenj wrote... > > > thanks for nothing, NBC. Bolt breaks Michael Johnson's epochal record > > > from 1996.
> > What exactly is wrong with you, anyway? You put it in the subject > > header just to make sure that no one can avoid knowing about it?
> > ('course, I saw it live, but still... you do this all the time)
> Seriously.
Jaros reminds me of two literary characters: Harold Emery Lauder and Sidney Sawyer. Pretty much everyone is the turd in the punchbowl at times - even if by accident - but no one REVELS in it like Jaros.
Well, okay... Andersock, but I don't read his posts. :P
On Aug 20, 7:25 am, stephenj <s...@cox.com> wrote:
> thanks for nothing, NBC. Bolt breaks Michael Johnson's epochal record > from 1996.
> 1)Bolt 19.30 (world record)
> 2) Martina
> 3) Spearmon (USA)
I have to say, though, that i am a bit surprised. With the way he ran the 100m, i thot he'd have run faster than what he did, esp. since (reportedly) he ran all the way in this event.
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:01:14 -0700 (PDT), J.C. "Watts" Enslin wrote... > On Aug 20, 11:43 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Aug 20, 10:25 am, stephenj <s...@cox.com> wrote:
> > > thanks for nothing, NBC. Bolt breaks Michael Johnson's epochal record > > > from 1996.
> > > 1)Bolt 19.30 (world record)
> > > 2) Martina
> > > 3) Spearmon (USA)
> > WHY would you post this knowing a lot of people here won't have a > > chance to watch it until tonight?
> WHY would anyone be tooling around on the internet if they hoped to > not know the results until NBC aired it 12+ hours later?
Oh come on, Enslin. There is a huge difference between avoiding posts that might contain spoilers and some tool actually putting the spoiling information in the subject header.
The really bad thing with Jaros is that you just have to know that it wasn't something accidental.
