> On Aug 20, 1:59 pm, estebanJ <sjar...@home.com> wrote:
> > On Aug 20, 12:14 pm, "J.C. \"Watts\" Enslin" <jens...@charter.net> > > wrote:
> > > On Aug 20, 12:08 pm, E .F. Hokie <efho...@nah.nope> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:01:14 -0700 (PDT), J.C. "Watts" Enslin wrote... > > > > > On Aug 20, 11:43 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Aug 20, 10:25 am, stephenj <s...@cox.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > thanks for nothing, NBC. Bolt breaks Michael Johnson's epochal record > > > > > > > from 1996.
> > > > > > > 1)Bolt 19.30 (world record)
> > > > > > > 2) Martina
> > > > > > > 3) Spearmon (USA)
> > > > > > WHY would you post this knowing a lot of people here won't have a > > > > > > chance to watch it until tonight?
> > > > > WHY would anyone be tooling around on the internet if they hoped to > > > > > not know the results until NBC aired it 12+ hours later?
> > > > Oh come on, Enslin. There is a huge difference between avoiding posts > > > > that might contain spoilers and some tool actually putting the spoiling > > > > information in the subject header.
> > > > The really bad thing with Jaros is that you just have to know that it > > > > wasn't something accidental.
> > > Jaros is under no obligation not to put information in a subject > > > header for the sake of someone who hides under a rock to not find out > > > results of Olympic competition that will be aired 12 hours later.
> > outstanding post.
> This is code for "I love sucking Enslin's cock."
Is there anyone reading this thread who actually *was* avoiding finding out the results so they could see them tonight?
On Aug 20, 9:52 am, Goro <evilnin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 20, 7:25 am, stephenj <s...@cox.com> wrote:
> > thanks for nothing, NBC. Bolt breaks Michael Johnson's epochal record > > from 1996.
> > 1)Bolt 19.30 (world record)
> > 2) Martina
> > 3) Spearmon (USA)
> I have to say, though, that i am a bit surprised. With the way he ran > the 100m, i thot he'd have run faster than what he did, esp. since > (reportedly) he ran all the way in this event.
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:14:02 -0700 (PDT), J.C. "Watts" Enslin wrote... > > > > WHY would anyone be tooling around on the internet if they hoped to > > > > not know the results until NBC aired it 12+ hours later?
> > > Oh come on, Enslin. There is a huge difference between avoiding posts > > > that might contain spoilers and some tool actually putting the spoiling > > > information in the subject header.
> > > The really bad thing with Jaros is that you just have to know that it > > > wasn't something accidental.
> > Jaros is under no obligation not to put information in a subject > > header for the sake of someone who hides under a rock to not find out > > results of Olympic competition that will be aired 12 hours later.
> I am SO not surprised to see you in the role of apologist for someone > showing no basic consideration for others. Not surprised at ALL.
On Aug 20, 12:57 pm, E .F. Hokie <efho...@nah.nope> wrote:
> 2. For all your false claims of trying to wind people up, you certainly > are easily wound-up, yourself... amusing, that.
This is an interruption of our flame programming to bring you all an interesting observation that Slick's stay in England is really starting to show now. That is a very English way of saying things, ending a sentence with, "...amusing, that." It's amazing how quickly we pick up speech mannerisms from new environments.
Okay, we now return you to our regularly scheduled flame programming.
Ralph Kennedy
"This is rsfc, not the Algonquin roundtable." -xyzzy, 2/16/07
> On Aug 20, 1:44 pm, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > On Aug 20, 1:59 pm, estebanJ <sjar...@home.com> wrote:
> > > On Aug 20, 12:14 pm, "J.C. \"Watts\" Enslin" <jens...@charter.net> > > > wrote:
> > > > On Aug 20, 12:08 pm, E .F. Hokie <efho...@nah.nope> wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:01:14 -0700 (PDT), J.C. "Watts" Enslin wrote... > > > > > > On Aug 20, 11:43 am, Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Aug 20, 10:25 am, stephenj <s...@cox.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > thanks for nothing, NBC. Bolt breaks Michael Johnson's epochal record > > > > > > > > from 1996.
> > > > > > > > 1)Bolt 19.30 (world record)
> > > > > > > > 2) Martina
> > > > > > > > 3) Spearmon (USA)
> > > > > > > WHY would you post this knowing a lot of people here won't have a > > > > > > > chance to watch it until tonight?
> > > > > > WHY would anyone be tooling around on the internet if they hoped to > > > > > > not know the results until NBC aired it 12+ hours later?
> > > > > Oh come on, Enslin. There is a huge difference between avoiding posts > > > > > that might contain spoilers and some tool actually putting the spoiling > > > > > information in the subject header.
> > > > > The really bad thing with Jaros is that you just have to know that it > > > > > wasn't something accidental.
> > > > Jaros is under no obligation not to put information in a subject > > > > header for the sake of someone who hides under a rock to not find out > > > > results of Olympic competition that will be aired 12 hours later.
> > > outstanding post.
> > This is code for "I love sucking Enslin's cock."
> Is there anyone reading this thread who actually *was* avoiding > finding out the results so they could see them tonight?
