DanS. wrote:
> MoParMaN, I've never been so impressed by your ability put all the
> words together as I was on 11/6/2009 in saying:
>> Chris Bellomy wrote:
>>> MoParMaN wrote, On 11/6/09 5:23 PM:
>>>> Chris Bellomy wrote:
>>>>> MoParMaN wrote, On 11/5/09 9:58 PM:
>>>>>> <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:3c9a85d2-6c3e-4da6-8970-7a8b01b6ef9a@d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> On Nov 5, 10:48 pm, "MoParMaN"
>>>>>> <scott.hendryx.clot...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote in message

>>>>>>> news:52fcbc29-5981-41cc-8714-e45fe4dde93e@v36g2000yqv.googlegroups.com...

>>>>>>>> Does the military fry, stick, hang, or shoot?
>>>>>>> They won't try it, the FBI will in Federal Court. He'll get what
>>>>>>> McVey got
>>>>>>> if convicted.

>>>>>>   Active duty on a military base with military victims?
>>>>>> (Seriously, why wouldn't the military try it?)

>>>>>> They won't, I took a class on this in 1974, I can't exactly quote
>>>>>> you why, but he'll be tried in Federal Court.
>>>>> Because federal law supersedes military law in all cases,
>>>>> I believe.

>>>>> cb

>>>> It can, but since he's military after all, he'll be tried and hung
>>>> more than likely.

>>> Federal law obviously permits that. See Timothy McVeigh.

>>> cb

>> As I remember, he was injected...I could be wrong though.

> I also believe he was no longer active duty.