> DanS. wrote:
>> MoParMaN, I've never been so impressed by your ability put all the
>> words together as I was on 11/6/2009 in saying:
>>> Chris Bellomy wrote:
>>>> MoParMaN wrote, On 11/6/09 5:23 PM:
>>>>> Chris Bellomy wrote:
>>>>>> MoParMaN wrote, On 11/5/09 9:58 PM:
>>>>>>> <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:3c9a85d2-6c3e-4da6-8970-7a8b01b6ef9a@d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>> On Nov 5, 10:48 pm, "MoParMaN"
>>>>>>> <scott.hendryx.clot...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> <deemsb...@aol.com> wrote in message

>>>>>>>> news:52fcbc29-5981-41cc-8714-e45fe4dde93e@v36g2000yqv.googlegroups.com...

>>>>>>>>> Does the military fry, stick, hang, or shoot?
>>>>>>>> They won't try it, the FBI will in Federal Court. He'll get what
>>>>>>>> McVey got
>>>>>>>> if convicted.

>>>>>>>   Active duty on a military base with military victims?
>>>>>>> (Seriously, why wouldn't the military try it?)

>>>>>>> They won't, I took a class on this in 1974, I can't exactly quote
>>>>>>> you why, but he'll be tried in Federal Court.
>>>>>> Because federal law supersedes military law in all cases,
>>>>>> I believe.

>>>>>> cb

>>>>> It can, but since he's military after all, he'll be tried and hung
>>>>> more than likely.

>>>> Federal law obviously permits that. See Timothy McVeigh.

>>>> cb

>>> As I remember, he was injected...I could be wrong though.

>> I also believe he was no longer active duty.

> No, he was tried in Federal Court, not the military.