Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion A serious threat to our national security
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Guy Macon  
View profile
 More options Aug 21 2008, 5:16 pm
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
From: Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:16:27 +0000
Local: Thurs, Aug 21 2008 5:16 pm
Subject: Re: A serious threat to our national security

AnimalMagic wrote:

>Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/> wrote:

>>James Arthur wrote:

>>>That's Bill Gate's major innovation--his solution to the
>>question "How can you make loads of money off a product
>>>that never breaks, and never wears out?"

>>>His answer is a combination of making sure the thing
>>>you buy is defective, and or deficient, or of making
>>>it obsolete, and parcelling out improvements (and
>>>even fixes) as slowly as possible.

>>>Hence changing Word and Excel's formats, changing the
>>>OS to break old applications, shipping bugs, security
>>>issues, etc.

>>>It just hit me yesterday--I've oft noted the harm he's
>>>done selling lousy software, but I just realized...he
>>>breaks our tools.  My superb DOS file compare, search
>>>routine, editor, directory utility, parallel port-
>>>operated interfaces, truly nifty ISA A/D board... broken.

>>>The advance of civilization has been one of building
>>>tool upon tool, hand tools ==> machines ==> machine
>>>tools ==> better machines ==> better tools.  Same for
>>>software.  And he breaks ours.

>>>Thanks Bill.

>>I was just reading that right before Russia invaded
>>Georgia, there was a cyberattack on Georgia's basic
>>network infrastructure launched from the Botnets that
>>Bill Gates created through the above policies.  I can
>>only conclude that Microsoft's ongoing refusal to make
>>a version of windows that cannot be remotely controlled
>>by criminals is now a serious threat to our national
>>security

>That's funny,

No it isn't. One researcher found that 80% of the traffic
on the Internet was botnets:
[ http://www.honeynet.org/papers/bots/ ].

Another estimates that around 25% of computers on the
net are infected and are part of botnets:
[ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6298641.stm ]

One botenet alone is sending 60 billion spam emails per day:
[ http://www.secureworks.com/research/threats/topbotnets/ ]

Not even slightly funny

>our entire network of thousands of PC
>across ten cities and spanning several companies, is
>all Windows, and we have secure networks.

Factual claims by anonymous Usenet posters are not
evidence. We have no way of evaluating the claim.
In particular, we j=have no assurance that you have
the ability to detect a botnet running on your network.
See _Botnets Don Invisibility Cloaks_ at
[ http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=113849 ].
One researcher estimates that virus/malware scanners only
detect about 75 percent of malware.
[ http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=122116&WT.svl=news1_1]

Certainly secure Windows networks do exist -- I have
one in my home lab.  It isn't hard to do, either; just
set up a hardware firewall (FreeSCO is good) a sowtware
firewall (Zone Alarm is good) and a malware scanner
(Kaspersky is good), keep up with the updates, and don't
download from untrusted sources, and Bob's your uncle.

The problem is that you have to take extra steps such as
descibed above to secure Windows.  When grandma buys a
new PC and runs it on a DSL line for a few years without
updating it, it becomes part of a botnet.  And there are
a *lot* of grandmas out there.

Also see:
http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/tips/ST06-001.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botnet  

>Just so you know, I use Linux as well.

That's interesting.  Not many Linux users have
"X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118" in their
headers.  Some do, though; Forte Agent runs under
WINE if you don't mind it crashing on close...

>You WinHater FuckTards really make me sick.

Why would you become so emotionally involved over
someone's OS preference?  

> So is Bill a businessman, or a thief?

You probably aren't aware that I am a libertarian.
A transaction where a willing buyer buys something
 -- even if that something is crap -- from a willing
seller can never be theft.

> Remember, your answer tells us a lot about your character.

No it doesn't.

--

  "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's
  game because they almost always turn out to be  -- or to be
  indistinguishable from -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds
  possessing infinite amounts of free time."
                             -Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
Guy Macon
<http://www.GuyMacon.com/>


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google