sci.math Google Group

Re: Laminar Flow @ Terminal Velocity: The Perfect Suspension for ??Magnetic Fibers

2010-03-10T04:10:54Z

You just don't know where.
Here, we'll try again:
If the goal is horizontal reflecting fibers on the ground all oriented
with respect to some angle with the earth's magnetic field, why would
anyone want the fibers to fall end on?
Bret Cahill

Re: Laminar Flow @ Terminal Velocity: The Perfect Suspension for ??Magnetic Fibers

2010-03-10T03:39:32Z

Been answered several times.
Your whole premise contradictory nonsense.

Re: Generalizing Carnot To Include Fuel Cells

2010-03-10T03:36:40Z

If you actually knew what the term "Carnot cycle" means, you would know
where it applies.

Re: Laminar Flow @ Terminal Velocity: The Perfect Suspension for ?Magnetic Fibers

2010-03-10T03:26:08Z

No answer?
Bret Cahill

Re: Generalizing Fuel Oxidizing Carnot To Include Fuel Cells

2010-03-10T03:18:26Z

Now generalize to include fuel cells.
Bret Cahill

Re: Generalizing Carnot To Include Fuel Cells

2010-03-10T03:17:10Z

You dodged the question.
Here, we'll try again:
Carnot applies to solar thermal, geo thermal and nuclear.
Does it apply to these?
Bret Cahill

Re: Translate math abstract to french

2010-03-10T03:04:35Z

On Mar 9, 11:37 pm, Frederick Williams <frederick.willia...@tesco.net >
wrote:
Yes, the paper titled "Filters on Posets and Generalizations", see
[link]

Re: Top 10 living mathematicians (or recently living)

2010-03-10T03:01:27Z

Indeed, this is imo the closest one to a Nobel in sciences.
Tonio

Re: JSH: Why fame is lame

2010-03-10T02:53:04Z

[...]
So, jealous colleagues turned Turing gay? Because he was too
appealing to women?
Those bastards!

Re: An Ultrafinite Set Theory

2010-03-10T02:42:25Z

[link]
See especially "On Feasible Numbers"
[link]
and the slides from a lecture where it is discussed
[link]

Re: The definition of Ordinals

2010-03-10T02:33:07Z

No. I think you read it wrong, I didn't say if every member of X is a
member of X, neither did I say that every member of a member of X is a
member of a member of X.
What I said was that every *member of a member* of X is a *member* of
X.
Zuhair

Re: The relationship between the Gaussian Curve and Pascal's Triangle Coefficients

2010-03-10T01:55:01Z

On Mar 10, 6:11 am, "2.7182818284590..." <tangent1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
They are very similar. You can think of the Gaussian as the limit as
the number of trials goes to infinity.

Re: Top 10 living mathematicians (or recently living)

2010-03-10T01:43:03Z

In article
<6335e418-1355-4c95-b8f3-3e6a1 9217...@k17g2000yqb.googlegrou ps.com>,
Don't you have to be a commuter to win that one?

Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!

2010-03-10T01:26:30Z

'Frictionless supersolid a step closer'
[link]
"Superfluidity and superconductivity cause particles to move without
friction. Koos Gubbels investigated under what conditions such
particles keep moving endlessly without losing energy, like a swimmer
who takes one mighty stroke and then keeps gliding forever along the

Re: JSH: Biggest mystery, pondering again hostility

2010-03-10T01:25:37Z

Like what?