Web Images News Orkut Groups Scholar Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 131 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
All-seeing-I  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 5:56 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 08:56:43 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 5:56 pm
Subject: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
Mon, 17 Jan 2005, 17:10:00 EDT
Edited by Debra Tone

ANNAPOLIS, MD /Send2Press Newswire/ -- Did ancient Greek artists
depict Kain (Cain) killing Abel on their most glorious temple, the
Parthenon? Yes, according to Robert Bowie Johnson, Jr., author of 'The
Parthenon Code: Mankind's History in Marble,' new from Solving Light
Books.

Johnson's book relates that the story of Kain killing Abel appeared on
four square sculpted panels in the center of the south side of the
Parthenon. While these were destroyed in the explosion of 1687,
accurate drawings of them from 1674 by French artist, Jacques Carrey,
survive. On the first panel, according to the book, Kain and Abel
talk. On the second, Kain argues with his own wife over a sacrifice.
On the third, Kain startles Abel in the field. On the fourth, Kain
kills Abel.

Kain was the eldest son of Adam and Eve; Seth, who replaced the
murdered Abel, was their youngest son. Genesis asserts that only
Noah's family of the line of Seth survived the Flood; all others who
practiced the anti-God way of Kain drowned. According to "The
Parthenon Code," the Greeks depicted their recollection of Noah's
Flood often on vases as Kentaurs (or Centaurs, half-men/half-horses
who represented the line of Seth), pounding a man named Kaineus into
the earth with rocks. Kaineus in Greek means "pertaining to Kain,"
thus Greek artists conveyed the historical message that all that
pertained to Kain had disappeared into the earth, matching the Genesis
account.

"The evidence shows that the Greeks knew exactly who Kain was. Their
entire religious system, what we erroneously call 'myth,' chronicles
the reestablishment of the way of Kain after the Flood," Mr. Johnson
said.

"The Greeks also knew exactly who Noah was: they called him Nereus,
the 'Wet One' often depicting his bottom half as a fish signifying
that he had come through the Flood. The Greeks built the Parthenon to
celebrate the triumph of the way of Kain over Noah and his God, and to
glorify Athena, a picture of the serpent-friendly Eve of Genesis," he
added.

Details/images: www.theparthenoncode.com

"The Parthenon Code" is already the best-selling book on the Parthenon
at amazon.com and bn.com. Barnes & Noble (Bookstores) has chosen the
book for special recognition during its small press celebration
throughout March.

NEWS SOURCE:  Solving Light Books
Send2Press® is the originating wire service for this story.
http://www.send2press.com/newswire/2005_01_0117-004.shtml

___________________________________________

OK Kooks. Worm your way outta this.

The Greeks have ZERO connection to religion or to the middle east.
Their stories (mythologies) are based on the actual stories that are
thousands of years old and clearly show that Adam and his genealogy
are well known. This included Noah's generations.

The ancients do not lie.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
RAM  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 6:06 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: RAM <ramather...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 09:06:16 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 6:06 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 10:56 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:

It is very silly.  Very imaginative but very silly nonetheless.  It
appeals to the religious fanatic who willing distorts anything to
confirm his religious biases.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Augray  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 6:32 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: Augray <aug...@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:32:34 -0500
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 6:32 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 08:56:43 -0800 (PST), All-seeing-I
<ap...@email.com> wrote in
<e9188bb6-b581-4320-a28e-9be228959...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> :

Then why don't you believe them?

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mike Dworetsky  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 6:35 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: "Mike Dworetsky" <platinum...@pants.btinternet.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:35:47 -0000
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 6:35 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah

This book seems to have slid into obscurity since 2005.

> ___________________________________________

> OK Kooks. Worm your way outta this.

> The Greeks have ZERO connection to religion or to the middle east.

That's totally false.  There were a lot of connections.  Which empire had
the Jews captive around the time of construction of the Parthenon?  Persia.
Which empire had one helluva lot of contact with the Hellenic world (lots of
wars, ever heard of the battle of Marathon, the battle of Salamis)?  Don't
you think they would have heard all these stories and incorporated them in
their myths, or that they had some parallel myths?  The Greeks also had a
story that sounded a lot like Abraham, Isaac and the ram.

[Marathon and Salamis were only a generation or two before the construction
of the Parthenon.]

All these early Middle Eastern religions, including the Greek, Israelite and
Canaanite ones had connections and some similarities.  Trade and contact in
the Eastern Mediterranean was extensive.

You need to pick up the book by Robert Graves, "The Greek Myths".

> Their stories (mythologies) are based on the actual stories that are
> thousands of years old and clearly show that Adam and his genealogy
> are well known. This included Noah's generations.

> The ancients do not lie.

Don't they?  How do you know, did they swear it on a stack of Bibles or
something?  Before it was written?

--
Mike Dworetsky

(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bob T.  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 6:45 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: "Bob T." <b...@synapse-cs.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 09:45:17 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 6:45 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 8:56 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:

> Mon, 17 Jan 2005, 17:10:00 EDT
> Edited by Debra Tone

<snip>
> ___________________________________________

> OK Kooks. Worm your way outta this.

> The Greeks have ZERO connection to religion

Huh?  The Greeks had religion.

> or to the middle east.

Except for trade, warfare, migration, etc.  In other words, the Greeks
were very close to the Middle East and they were in constant contact
with people who lived there.  Try looking at a map of the world
sometime, Adman - you might notice that Greece is very very close to
the Middle East.

> Their stories (mythologies) are based on the actual stories that are
> thousands of years old

Indeed, that is how we know as a historical fact that Hercules was the
son of Zeus, and that the sun is pulled across the sky by Apollo's
chariot every day.

> and clearly show that Adam and his genealogy are well known. This included Noah's generations.

This phrase "clearly show" - I do not think it means what you think it
means.  Or would mean, if it were correct grammer.

> The ancients do not lie.

Of course they did - but very few of them lied as much as you do.

- Bob T.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Reddfrogg  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 6:53 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 09:53:56 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 6:53 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 9:56 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:

> Mon, 17 Jan 2005, 17:10:00 EDT
> Edited by Debra Tone

> ANNAPOLIS, MD /Send2Press Newswire/ -- Did ancient Greek artists
> depict Kain (Cain) killing Abel on their most glorious temple, the
> Parthenon? Yes, according to Robert Bowie Johnson, Jr., author of 'The
> Parthenon Code: Mankind's History in Marble,' new from Solving Light
> Books.

snipping Woo-Woo press release.

> OK Kooks. Worm your way outta this.

Out of what?  The "interpretations" made by the author are rather
fanciful, and hardly credible.

> The Greeks have ZERO connection to religion or to the middle east.

Which should indicate that the claims made by the author of this work
are suspect.

> Their stories (mythologies) are based on the actual stories that are
> thousands of years old

No, like most mythologies, their stories are based on oral tradition,
which often contains bits of facts, bits of fancy, and stuff made up
from whole cloth.

> and clearly show that Adam and his genealogy
> are well known. This included Noah's generations.

Several of the assumptions the author makes are suspect, including the
claim that Centaurs were to represent Seth's linage, and that Noah is
depicted as a merman.   It's also interesting that according to you,
all of Kain's race were killed off by "The Flood" but the ancient
Greek's were supposedly trying to celebrate

"The Greeks built the Parthenon to
celebrate the triumph of the way of Kain over Noah and his God, and
to
glorify Athena, a picture of the serpent-friendly Eve of Genesis,"

If Kain and all his descendants were killed in the "Flood", how did
"the way of Kain" triumph over Noah?

> The ancients do not lie.

The ancients, like anyone else, liked a good story, and made up
stories to explain things they didn't understand.    There's no reason
to think that the stories in ancient Greece had anything to do with
the Noah story the Israelites borrowed from the Babylonians.    Even
if there is a link, it's more likely that the Greeks got it from the
Babylonians than they got it from the much lesser known Israelites..

DJT


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
All-seeing-I  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:08 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:08:36 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:08 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 11:53 am, Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net> wrote:

None of you have addressed the fact that this is independent evidence
for Adam and his genealogy.

Denial. It is not just a river in Egypt!!


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
chris thompson  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:09 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: chris thompson <chris.linthomp...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:09:08 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:09 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 11:56 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:

[...]

> The ancients do not lie.

That being the case, we can assume you also worship Zeus, Hera,
Apollo, Hephaestus, Aphrodite, Athena, Diana, Ares, and Hades? That
you believe in naiads, dryads, nereids, and muses?

Chris


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Free Lunch  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:14 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:14:26 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:14 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:08:36 -0800 (PST), All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com>
wrote in talk.origins:

There is no such independent evidence and you know that. Why did you lie
to us?


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bob T.  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:20 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: "Bob T." <b...@synapse-cs.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:20:41 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:20 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 10:08 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:

Yes, we have: we have pointed out that this is _not_ independent
evidence for Adam and his geneology at all.  In fact, one would have
to be quite stupid and naive to believe this is "evidence" at all.

> Denial. It is not just a river in Egypt!!

Did you know that the word "gullible" is not in the Bible?

- Bob T.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Reddfrogg  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:20 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:20:26 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:20 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 11:08 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:

As I pointed out above, the above is not "independent evidence" for
Adam, or any of his supposed family.   It was a fanciful
interpretation of some panels from the Parthenon.    The author was
clearly force fitting the "evidence" to fit his preconceived notion.

You also haven't answered my point above:  If all of Cain's
descendants were killed in "The Flood", why would the  the Greeks (who
supposedly come from Noah's descendants, not Cain's)  celebrating a
victory of Cain over Noah?    Why does the "Parthenon Code" include
Abel's wife, when no mention of such in made in the Bible?

The drawings of the missing panels from the Parthenon (convieniently
blown up, and not available to compare with the drawings), are most
likely relating a story entirely unrelated to Cain and Abel.

> Denial. It is not just a river in Egypt!!

Quite right, it's a major component of Creationism.    You deny the
obvious problems with the author's "interpretation" because you want
to believe in the "Flood".     The connection the author makes with
the Cain and Abel story, and the Noah's Ark story are strained at
best.

DJT


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Hatunen  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:28 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: Hatunen <hatu...@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:28:01 -0700
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:28 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 08:56:43 -0800 (PST), All-seeing-I

Wow. The Greeks had a myth about a brother killing his brother.
Did they use the actual names "kain" and "Abel"?

You know what, the Greeks also had a flood:

"In Greek mythology, Deucalion [...] was a son of Prometheus and
Pronoia. When the anger of Zeus was ignited against the hubris of
the Pelasgians, Zeus decided to put an end to the Bronze Age with
the Deluge. For Lycaon, the king of Arcadia had sacrificed a boy
to Zeus. Zeus was appalled to this cannibal offering and others
like that. So Zeus set upon loosing a deluge, where the rivers
would run in torrents and the sea encroach rapidly on the coastal
plain, engulf the foothills with spray, and wash everything
clean. Deucalion was then saved from this deluge, by the aid of
his father Prometheus, like his Biblical analogue Noah and the
Mesopotamian counterpart Utnapishtim by building an ark."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deucalion

So the flood is a Mesopotamian story that the Greeks might have
adopted. It shldn't be too hard to find an ark, since several
seem to have been built.

--
   ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatu...@cox.net) *************
   *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
   * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Hatunen  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:35 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: Hatunen <hatu...@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:35:28 -0700
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:35 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:08:36 -0800 (PST), All-seeing-I

No it isn't. But it is evidence of the intercourse between
various countries of the time. Most of these common myths are
simply adaptations of existing myths, most of which originated in
Mesopotamia.

--
   ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatu...@cox.net) *************
   *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
   * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ray Martinez  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:46 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: Ray Martinez <pyramid...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:46:07 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:46 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 9:06 am, RAM <ramather...@gmail.com> wrote:

Could we expect a Darwinist to say anything else?

Ray


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Reddfrogg  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:50 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: Reddfrogg <reddfr...@bresnan.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:50:47 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:50 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 11:46 am, Ray Martinez <pyramid...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Yes, Ray, one could expect a 'Darwinist' to say many things.   But the
statment he made is correct.   Do you dispute it?

DJT


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
VoiceOfReason  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 8:20 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: VoiceOfReason <papa_...@cybertown.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:20:11 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 8:20 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 11:56 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:

Damn, you'll believe anything, won't you?  :-D

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
VoiceOfReason  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 8:25 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: VoiceOfReason <papa_...@cybertown.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:25:32 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 8:25 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 12:35 pm, "Mike Dworetsky"

Just a survey of the number of religions prior to Christianity that
mentioned virgin birth is an eye opener.

<...>


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
All-Seeing-I  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 8:31 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: All-Seeing-I <allseei...@usa.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:31:57 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 8:31 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 12:09 pm, chris thompson <chris.linthomp...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Nov 7, 11:56 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:

> [...]

> > The ancients do not lie.

> That being the case, we can assume you also worship Zeus, Hera,
> Apollo, Hephaestus, Aphrodite, Athena, Diana, Ares, and Hades? That
> you believe in naiads, dryads, nereids, and muses?

> Chris

Only if i want to follow the way of "Kain"

For everything on Earth that God has done, Satan has made a
counterfit.

The Greek religion isthe counterfit story of Adam's family.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
All-Seeing-I  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 8:32 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: All-Seeing-I <allseei...@usa.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:32:37 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 8:32 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 1:20 pm, VoiceOfReason <papa_...@cybertown.com> wrote:

THAT would be you.

You believe evolution!


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
DJT  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 8:38 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: DJT <mousede...@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:38:41 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 8:38 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 12:31 pm, All-Seeing-I <allseei...@usa.com> wrote:

Cain had nothing to do with the Greek Gods.   How could he, as the
Greeks were supposedly descendants of Noah?

> For everything on Earth that God has done, Satan has made a
> counterfit.

Ie. Creationism.

> The Greek religion isthe counterfit story of Adam's family.

Or, you are badly mistaken about this, yet again.

DJT


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
DJT  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 8:40 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: DJT <mousede...@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:40:17 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 8:40 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Nov 7, 12:32 pm, All-Seeing-I <allseei...@usa.com> wrote:

Evolution is a well established scientific theory, that is massively
supported by the evidence.   Your quoted material above is the
ramblings of a religious nut.

Why is it wrong to accept science, but right to grasp at this thin
straw you've found?

DJT

- Hide quoted text -


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
heekster  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 9:36 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: heekster <heeks...@ifiwxtc.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:36:38 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 9:36 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:31:57 -0800 (PST), All-Seeing-I

Counterfeit, perhaps, illiterate one?

So to balance you out, somewhere, there is someone with courage, an
education, a strong sense of ethics, a healthy dose of common sense,
and a willingness to learn new things, and to question dogma.

And who does not tell lies.

>The Greek religion isthe counterfit story of Adam's family.

You failed to show this, in any way shape or form.

All you did was put forth an imbecilic unsubstantiated allegation,
which is unremarkably stupid, on its face.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ye Old One  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 9:45 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: Ye Old One <use...@mcsuk.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:45:10 GMT
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 9:45 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:08:36 -0800 (PST), All-seeing-I
<ap...@email.com> enriched this group when s/he wrote:

>None of you have addressed the fact that this is independent evidence
>for Adam and his genealogy.

Because it isn't anything of the sort.

--
Bob.

People may not always remember exactly what you said, but they will
always remember just how bright you made them feel.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
heekster  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 10:01 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: heekster <heeks...@ifiwxtc.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:01:32 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 10:01 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:08:36 -0800 (PST), All-seeing-I

It is all apocryphal.
There is no evidence
Only "interpretations".

Produce evidence, and it will be addressed.

You have yet to do so.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Free Lunch  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 10:32 pm
Newsgroups: talk.origins
From: Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:32:40 -0600
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 10:32 pm
Subject: Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:46:07 -0800 (PST), Ray Martinez
<pyramid...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.origins:

>On Nov 7, 9:06 am, RAM <ramather...@gmail.com> wrote:

...

>> It is very silly.  Very imaginative but very silly nonetheless.  It
>> appeals to the religious fanatic who willing distorts anything to
>> confirm his religious biases.- Hide quoted text -

>> - Show quoted text -

>Could we expect a Darwinist to say anything else?

Can we expect an immoral, lying fool like Ray to ever tell the truth?

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 25 of 131   Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google