The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the mountain the ark came to rest on.
"Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
"the fountains of the deep opened up"
Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we see for evolution!
ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
> The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the > mountain the ark came to rest on.
> "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back > various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation > changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by > U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded > the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers > discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
> Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
> Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
> "the fountains of the deep opened up"
> Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we > see for evolution!
> ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. > Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
On Nov 7, 9:06 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
> The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the > mountain the ark came to rest on.
And still missing.
> "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back > various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation > changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by > U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded > the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers > discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
Misrepresentaion, noted.
> Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
> Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
Nothing.
> "the fountains of the deep opened up"
Not the same thing.
> Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we > see for evolution!
In your dreams, fool.
> ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. > Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
So far, that flood evidence is batting 0 for 0.
> -- > Who is the person behind that curtain?
> The Great and Powerful All Seeing I has spoken!
So, you lied when you said you were following the ways of Jesus? Where does Jesus say it's okay to be an arrogant prick?
> On Nov 7, 9:06 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
> > The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the > > mountain the ark came to rest on.
> > "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back > > various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation > > changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by > > U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded > > the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers > > discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
> > Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
> > Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
> > "the fountains of the deep opened up"
> > Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we > > see for evolution!
> > ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. > > Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
> > -- > > Who is the person behind that curtain?
> > The Great and Powerful All Seeing I has spoken!
*PRAVDA*!!!! Oh, you stupid schmuck! Next, you'll be citing the" Alien Meet's Obama after Lunch with Bat Boy" from the Weekly Worl News, or the Enquirer!
It just goes to show that you'd probably swallow a gob of someone else's snot if you thought it would support your world view.
> On Nov 7, 9:06 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
> > The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the > > mountain the ark came to rest on.
> > "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back > > various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation > > changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by > > U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded > > the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers > > discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
> > Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
> > Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
> > "the fountains of the deep opened up"
> > Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we > > see for evolution!
> > ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. > > Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
> > -- > > Who is the person behind that curtain?
> > The Great and Powerful All Seeing I has spoken!
"On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:06:16 -0800 (PST), in article <1dfc7659-4fe5-404d-bd2c-b9ae7b123...@l2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, All-seeing-I stated..."
>The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the >mountain the ark came to rest on.
>"Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back >various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation >changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by >U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded >the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers >discovered immense bodies of water below the earth=92s surface."
[...snip...]
By the wonders of Google, we can find the source for this:
UFODigest,"UFO and Paranormal News From Around the World", November 7, 2009, "Huge oceans underneath Earth's surfacecaused global flood in times of Noah, Translated by Guerman Grachev"
I didn't see a reference to the source that Grachev translated. From the name, I'd guess that it was a Russian source. Maybe one of those Russian tabloids?
-- ---Tom S. the failure to nail currant jelly to a wall is not due to the nail; it is due to the currant jelly. Theodore Roosevelt, Letter to William Thayer, 1915 July 2
On Nov 7, 7:06 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
> The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the > mountain the ark came to rest on.
> "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back > various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation > changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by > U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded > the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers > discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
> Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
> Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
> "the fountains of the deep opened up"
The actual science has been distorted and amplified through re-telling by superstitious people, who innocently but stupidly mix in what they already "know" from religion.
I'll guess that the factual underpinning of this story is that there does exist a 2006 paper Lawrence, J. F., and M. E. Wysession, Seismic evidence for subduction- transported water in the lower mantle, in Earth's Deep-Water Cycle, AGU Monograph, 251-261, 2006.
> Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we > see for evolution!
This is the really cool and sensational part -- not just a big discovery in geology, but a fantastic new principle of science. No longer do we need actual evidence. Instead, we can look at a scrap of evidence and *extrapolate* to what future evidence is *going to be*!
This will be really good news to researchers who, until now, spent countless tedious hours checking their results, accumulating more data when the statistics aren't quite strong enough to persuade the skeptical, and who, more often than not, are disappointed and have (until now) had to relinquish attractive theories because they just turn out to be wrong.
All-seeing-I wrote: > The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the > mountain the ark came to rest on.
> "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back > various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation > changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by > U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded > the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers > discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
> Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
> Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
> "the fountains of the deep opened up"
> Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we > see for evolution!
> ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. > Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
So that's your problem? You're looking for evidence to "prove" the Bible? Why is your faith so weak?
> On Nov 7, 9:17 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 9:06 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
> > > The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the > > > mountain the ark came to rest on.
> > > "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back > > > various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation > > > changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by > > > U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded > > > the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers > > > discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
> > > Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
> > > Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
> > > "the fountains of the deep opened up"
> > > Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we > > > see for evolution!
> > > ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. > > > Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
> > > -- > > > Who is the person behind that curtain?
> > > The Great and Powerful All Seeing I has spoken!
> *PRAVDA*!!!! Oh, you stupid schmuck! Next, you'll be citing the" > Alien Meet's Obama after Lunch with Bat Boy" from the Weekly Worl > News, or the Enquirer!
> It just goes to show that you'd probably swallow a gob of someone > else's snot if you thought it would support your world view.
> Provda! Sheeeeeeeeee!
An aside, I've noticed that in the post-Communism era, Pravda seems to have degenerated into a National-Enquirer wannabe (at least the online version). Is the print version just as loony?
> On Nov 7, 10:24 am, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > On Nov 7, 9:17 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 7, 9:06 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
> > > > The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the > > > > mountain the ark came to rest on.
> > > > "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back > > > > various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation > > > > changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by > > > > U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded > > > > the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers > > > > discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
> > > > Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
> > > > Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
> > > > "the fountains of the deep opened up"
> > > > Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we > > > > see for evolution!
> > > > ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. > > > > Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
> > > > -- > > > > Who is the person behind that curtain?
> > > > The Great and Powerful All Seeing I has spoken!
> > *PRAVDA*!!!! Oh, you stupid schmuck! Next, you'll be citing the" > > Alien Meet's Obama after Lunch with Bat Boy" from the Weekly Worl > > News, or the Enquirer!
> > It just goes to show that you'd probably swallow a gob of someone > > else's snot if you thought it would support your world view.
> > Provda! Sheeeeeeeeee!
> An aside, I've noticed that in the post-Communism era, Pravda seems to > have degenerated into a National-Enquirer wannabe (at least the online > version). Is the print version just as loony?
>On Nov 7, 9:06 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote: >> The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the >> mountain the ark came to rest on.
>> "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back >> various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation >> changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by >> U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded >> the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers >> discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
>> Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
>> Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
>> "the fountains of the deep opened up"
>> Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we >> see for evolution!
>> ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. >> Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
>> -- >> Who is the person behind that curtain?
>> The Great and Powerful All Seeing I has spoken!
<ap...@email.com> wrote: >On Nov 7, 9:06 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote: >> The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the >> mountain the ark came to rest on.
>> "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back >> various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation >> changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by >> U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded >> the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers >> discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
>> Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
>> Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
>> "the fountains of the deep opened up"
>> Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we >> see for evolution!
>> ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. >> Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
>> -- >> Who is the person behind that curtain?
>> The Great and Powerful All Seeing I has spoken!
All-seeing-I wrote: > The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the > mountain the ark came to rest on.
> "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back > various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation > changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by > U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded > the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers > discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
Where does this quote come from? It makes no sense.
All-seeing-I wrote: > On Nov 7, 9:06 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote: >> The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the >> mountain the ark came to rest on.
>> "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back >> various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation >> changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by >> U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded >> the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers >> discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
>> Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
>> Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
>> "the fountains of the deep opened up"
>> Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we >> see for evolution!
>> ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. >> Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
>> -- >> Who is the person behind that curtain?
>> The Great and Powerful All Seeing I has spoken!
On Nov 7, 10:06 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
> The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the > mountain the ark came to rest on.
> "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back > various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation > changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by > U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded > the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers > discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
ah. 'researchers'...wouldn't be creationists by any chance, would they?
> ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true.
well let's see...we already proved exodus isn't true...and you turned tail and ran when this was shown...
> Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
that would be true. if the ark story were true.
but it ain't. and as a number of us proved, the bible is not literally true
> -- > Who is the person behind that curtain?
> The Great and Powerful All Seeing I has spoken!
actually creationism has ALOT in common with the wizard of oz...
>"On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:06:16 -0800 (PST), in article ><1dfc7659-4fe5-404d-bd2c-b9ae7b123...@l2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, All-seeing-I >stated..."
>>The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the >>mountain the ark came to rest on.
>>"Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back >>various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation >>changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by >>U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded >>the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers >>discovered immense bodies of water below the earth=92s surface." >[...snip...]
>By the wonders of Google, we can find the source for this:
>UFODigest,"UFO and Paranormal News From Around the World", November 7, >2009, "Huge oceans underneath Earth's surfacecaused global flood in >times of Noah, Translated by Guerman Grachev"
>I didn't see a reference to the source that Grachev translated. From >the name, I'd guess that it was a Russian source. Maybe one of those >Russian tabloids?
> The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the > mountain the ark came to rest on.
> "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back > various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation > changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by > U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded > the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers > discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
> Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
> Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
> "the fountains of the deep opened up"
> Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we > see for evolution!
> ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. > Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
> -- > Who is the person behind that curtain?
> The Great and Powerful All Seeing I has spoken!
So, you are claiming that the internal volume of the planet contained enough water to cover the surface of the planet to a depth of more than a mile AND the removal of this water from the interior did not result in the collapse of the surface crust the aforementioned water drained back into the sub-surface domains from it came. Oh,and most of the people on the planet never noticed this as it happened.
You know, I used to suggest that your attendants adjust your meds. Now I don't because you can't medicate stupidity.
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:06:16 -0800 (PST), All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> enriched this group when s/he wrote:
>The evidence against Noah's flood is mounting.
Post corrected without charge.
Madman (aka Mudbrain) is on record as claiming:-
That 3.5% actually means 25%...
That the actor Paul Newman was a creationist...
That "Dr." Kent Hovind has made lots of *scientific* discoveries...
That wars have been fought because some scientific finding discredited some facet of some religion...
To have a "higher education" than most posters to this news group...
To understand how geologists determine the age of any given sample of rock...
That trilobites were Cambrian mammals... [that one still makes me laugh]
And that he has "created genes" and not evolved ape genes...
That linguists have traced all the world's languages to the Middle East region and back to around the same time as the bible claims Noah and his sons rebuilt mankind.
Claimed that talk.origin's moderator was a troll.
Claimed cigarettes do not cause cancer.
Now, I ask you, is this the sort of guy you would give an credence to? Certainly I don't.
Boikat wrote: > On Nov 7, 9:52 am, VoiceOfReason <papa_...@cybertown.com> wrote: >> On Nov 7, 10:24 am, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>> On Nov 7, 9:17 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
>>>> On Nov 7, 9:06 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
>>>>> The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high >>>>> as the mountain the ark came to rest on.
>>>>> "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to >>>>> back various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The >>>>> situation changed in February following reports on a sensational >>>>> discovery by U.S. researchers. According to their study, the >>>>> water which flooded the planet came out from the depths of Earth. >>>>> The researchers discovered immense bodies of water below the >>>>> earth’s surface."
>>>>> Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
>>>>> Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
>>>>> "the fountains of the deep opened up"
>>>>> Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood >>>>> as we see for evolution!
>>>>> ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is >>>>> true. Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
>>>>> -- >>>>> Who is the person behind that curtain?
>>>>> The Great and Powerful All Seeing I has spoken!
>>> *PRAVDA*!!!! Oh, you stupid schmuck! Next, you'll be citing the" >>> Alien Meet's Obama after Lunch with Bat Boy" from the Weekly Worl >>> News, or the Enquirer!
>>> It just goes to show that you'd probably swallow a gob of someone >>> else's snot if you thought it would support your world view.
>>> Provda! Sheeeeeeeeee!
>> An aside, I've noticed that in the post-Communism era, Pravda seems >> to have degenerated into a National-Enquirer wannabe (at least the >> online version). Is the print version just as loony?
> Yes.
> Boikat
Even in communist times, the saying was that "there is no Izvestia in Pravda, and no Pravda in Izvestia". (Pravda means truth; Izvestia means news.)
>On Nov 7, 10:24 am, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote: >> On Nov 7, 9:17 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
>> > On Nov 7, 9:06 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
>> > > The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the >> > > mountain the ark came to rest on.
>> > > "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back >> > > various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation >> > > changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by >> > > U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded >> > > the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers >> > > discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
>> > > Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
>> > > Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
>> > > "the fountains of the deep opened up"
>> > > Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we >> > > see for evolution!
>> > > ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. >> > > Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
>> > > -- >> > > Who is the person behind that curtain?
>> > > The Great and Powerful All Seeing I has spoken!
>> *PRAVDA*!!!! Oh, you stupid schmuck! Next, you'll be citing the" >> Alien Meet's Obama after Lunch with Bat Boy" from the Weekly Worl >> News, or the Enquirer!
>> It just goes to show that you'd probably swallow a gob of someone >> else's snot if you thought it would support your world view.
>> Provda! Sheeeeeeeeee!
>An aside, I've noticed that in the post-Communism era, Pravda seems to >have degenerated into a National-Enquirer wannabe (at least the online >version). Is the print version just as loony?
I'd question whether "degenerated" is the correct word. "There’s no news in Pravda and no truth in Izvestiya" wasn't hyperbole.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless
>All-seeing-I wrote: >> The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the >> mountain the ark came to rest on.
>> "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back >> various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation >> changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by >> U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded >> the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers >> discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
>> Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
>> Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
>> "the fountains of the deep opened up"
>> Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we >> see for evolution!
>> ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. >> Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
>So that's your problem? You're looking for evidence to "prove" the >Bible? Why is your faith so weak?
>On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:52:01 -0800 (PST), the following >appeared in talk.origins, posted by VoiceOfReason ><papa_...@cybertown.com>:
>>On Nov 7, 10:24 am, Boikat <boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote: >>> On Nov 7, 9:17 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
>>> > On Nov 7, 9:06 am, All-seeing-I <ap...@email.com> wrote:
>>> > > The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the >>> > > mountain the ark came to rest on.
>>> > > "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back >>> > > various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation >>> > > changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by >>> > > U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded >>> > > the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers >>> > > discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
>>> > > Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
>>> > > Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
>>> > > "the fountains of the deep opened up"
>>> > > Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood as we >>> > > see for evolution!
>>> > > ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is true. >>> > > Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
>>> > > -- >>> > > Who is the person behind that curtain?
>>> > > The Great and Powerful All Seeing I has spoken!
>>> *PRAVDA*!!!! Oh, you stupid schmuck! Next, you'll be citing the" >>> Alien Meet's Obama after Lunch with Bat Boy" from the Weekly Worl >>> News, or the Enquirer!
>>> It just goes to show that you'd probably swallow a gob of someone >>> else's snot if you thought it would support your world view.
>>> Provda! Sheeeeeeeeee!
>>An aside, I've noticed that in the post-Communism era, Pravda seems to >>have degenerated into a National-Enquirer wannabe (at least the online >>version). Is the print version just as loony?
>I'd question whether "degenerated" is the correct word. >"There’s no news in Pravda and no truth in Izvestiya" wasn't >hyperbole.
I'm sure their chess columns weren't half bad. The only area in which the Soviets really did excel.
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:06:16 -0800 (PST), All-seeing-I
<ap...@email.com> wrote: > The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting.
Why don't you share that evidence with the rest of the world? Why keep it secret?
-- http://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
<jharsh...@pacbell.net> wrote: > All-seeing-I wrote: > > The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high as the > > mountain the ark came to rest on.
> > "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to back > > various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The situation > > changed in February following reports on a sensational discovery by > > U.S. researchers. According to their study, the water which flooded > > the planet came out from the depths of Earth. The researchers > > discovered immense bodies of water below the earth’s surface."
> Where does this quote come from? It makes no sense.
A flying saucer magazine. No, really.
-- http://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
> Boikat wrote: >> On Nov 7, 9:52 am, VoiceOfReason<papa_...@cybertown.com> wrote: >>> On Nov 7, 10:24 am, Boikat<boi...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>> On Nov 7, 9:17 am, All-seeing-I<ap...@email.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Nov 7, 9:06 am, All-seeing-I<ap...@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The evidence for Noah's flood is mounting. It is almost as high >>>>>> as the mountain the ark came to rest on.
>>>>>> "Until recently there was not any solid scientific evidence to >>>>>> back various theories pertaining to the origins of the Flood. The >>>>>> situation changed in February following reports on a sensational >>>>>> discovery by U.S. researchers. According to their study, the >>>>>> water which flooded the planet came out from the depths of Earth. >>>>>> The researchers discovered immense bodies of water below the >>>>>> earth s surface."
>>>>>> Immence? Wowsa...wowsa.. wowsa.. as Ritchie Cunningham would say.
>>>>>> Heh. Wait a minuet. What did the bible mention about this?
>>>>>> "the fountains of the deep opened up"
>>>>>> Soon there will be as much circumstantial evidence for the flood >>>>>> as we see for evolution!
>>>>>> ooopsie... oh darn... if the flood happened then the bible is >>>>>> true. Which would mean some parts of evolution are false.
>>>>>> -- >>>>>> Who is the person behind that curtain?
>>>>>> The Great and Powerful All Seeing I has spoken!
>>>> *PRAVDA*!!!! Oh, you stupid schmuck! Next, you'll be citing the" >>>> Alien Meet's Obama after Lunch with Bat Boy" from the Weekly Worl >>>> News, or the Enquirer!
>>>> It just goes to show that you'd probably swallow a gob of someone >>>> else's snot if you thought it would support your world view.
>>>> Provda! Sheeeeeeeeee!
>>> An aside, I've noticed that in the post-Communism era, Pravda seems >>> to have degenerated into a National-Enquirer wannabe (at least the >>> online version). Is the print version just as loony?
>> Yes.
>> Boikat
> Even in communist times, the saying was that "there is no Izvestia in > Pravda, and no Pravda in Izvestia". (Pravda means truth; Izvestia means > news.)
Pravda.ru is apparently unaffiliated with the tabloid currently holding that name, which itself was only founded by former staff of the original Pravda.